Paper · 2003 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Damage Potential of Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Early Growth Stages of Small-Grains and Canola Under Subarctic Conditions

Sultan H. Begna; Dennis J. Fielding

14
claims
18
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We characterized the type and extent of grasshopper injury to above- and below-ground plant parts for four crops [barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), oats (Avena sativa L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and canola (Brassica campestris L.)] commonly grown, or with potential to grow, in central Alaska. Cages were placed on 48 pots containing plants in second to third leaf stages and stocked with 0, 2, 4, and 6 first-instar Melanoplus sanguinipes F. pot−1. Plants were harvested 22 d after planting. Stem growth of barley and oats was not affected except at the highest grasshopper treatment. In canola, stem biomass was reduced at the medium and high grasshopper treatments, when most of the leaves had been consumed. The highest grasshopper treatment reduced leaf area in barley and oats by ≈55%, and caused a significant reduction in dry weight of leaves, stems, and roots (41–72%). Wheat and canola plants were smaller than barley and oats across all treatments and, at the highest grasshopper density, above-ground portions of wheat and canola were completely destroyed. Length and surface area of roots of barley and oats were reduced by 20–28% again at the highest grasshopper density, whereas the reduction for wheat and canola ranged from 50 to 90%. There was little or no difference among all grasshopper densities for C-N ratio in leaf and stem tissues of all crops. The results suggest that wheat and canola are more susceptible than barley and oats and that densities ≥2 pot−1 (≈≥50 m−2) of even very small grasshoppers could cause significant damage in small-grain and oilseed crop production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley stem growth was affected only at highest grasshopper density.

Treatment
highest grasshopper treatmente0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
Stem growthe0
Direction
not affected excepte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem growth of barley and oats was not affected except at the highest grasshopper treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat stem growth was affected only at highest grasshopper density.

Treatment
highest grasshopper treatmente0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
Stem growthe0
Direction
not affected excepte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Stem growth of barley and oats was not affected except at the highest grasshopper treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium and high grasshopper treatments reduced canola stem biomass.

Treatment
medium and high grasshopper treatmentse0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
stem biomasse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In canola, stem biomass was reduced at the medium and high grasshopper treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grasshopper density reduced barley leaf area by approximately 55%.

Treatment
highest grasshopper treatmente0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
≈55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grasshopper treatment reduced leaf area in barley and oats by ≈55%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grasshopper density reduced oat leaf area by approximately 55%.

Treatment
highest grasshopper treatmente0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
≈55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grasshopper treatment reduced leaf area in barley and oats by ≈55%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–792 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grasshopper density reduced barley leaf, stem, and root dry weight by 41–72%.

Interactor
GrasshoppersAcridomorphat0pest
Outcome
dry weight of leaves, stems, and rootse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
41–72%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“caused a significant reduction in dry weight of leaves, stems, and roots (41–72%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Early Growth Stages of Small-Grains and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grasshopper density reduced oat leaf, stem, and root dry weight by 41–72%.

Interactor
GrasshoppersAcridomorphat0pest
Outcome
dry weight of leaves, stems, and rootse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
41–72%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“caused a significant reduction in dry weight of leaves, stems, and roots (41–72%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Early Growth Stages of Small-Grains and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At highest density, grasshoppers destroyed above-ground wheat plants.

Treatment
highest grasshopper densitye0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
above-ground portionse0
Direction
completely destroyede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the highest grasshopper density, above-ground portions of wheat and canola were completely destroyed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At highest density, grasshoppers destroyed above-ground canola plants.

Treatment
highest grasshopper densitye0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
above-ground portionse0
Direction
completely destroyede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the highest grasshopper density, above-ground portions of wheat and canola were completely destroyed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grasshopper density reduced barley root length and surface area by 20–28%.

Treatment
highest grasshopper densitye0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
Length and surface area of rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20–28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Length and surface area of roots of barley and oats were reduced by 20–28% again at the highest grasshopper density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grasshopper density reduced oat root length and surface area by 20–28%.

Treatment
highest grasshopper densitye0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
Length and surface area of rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20–28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Length and surface area of roots of barley and oats were reduced by 20–28% again at the highest grasshopper density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grasshopper density reduced wheat root length and surface area by 50–90%.

Interactor
GrasshoppersAcridomorphat0pest
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50 to 90%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction for wheat and canola ranged from 50 to 90%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Early Growth Stages of Small-Grains and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highest grasshopper density reduced canola root length and surface area by 50–90%.

Interactor
GrasshoppersAcridomorphat0pest
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50 to 90%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction for wheat and canola ranged from 50 to 90%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) on Early Growth Stages of Small-Grains and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and stem C-N ratios differed little or not at all across grasshopper densities.

Taxon
all cropse0
Treatment
all grasshopper densitiese0
Interactor
grasshoppere0pest
Outcome
C-N ratio in leaf and stem tissuese0
Direction
little or no differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was little or no difference among all grasshopper densities for C-N ratio in leaf and stem tissues of all crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1372 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.