Paper · 2004 · Agronomy Journal

Residual Effects of Manure and Compost Applications on Corn Production and Soil Properties

Bahman Eghball; Daniel Ginting; John E. Gilley

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
131
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Residual effects of manure or compost application on crop production and soil properties can last for several years. This study was conducted to evaluate residual effects of annual or biennial applications of N- and P-based composted and noncomposted beef cattle (Bos taurus) feedlot manure, chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties. Manure and compost were applied from 1992 to 1995, and the residual effects were determined from 1997 to 1999. Residual effects of N- and P-based manure and compost applications on corn grain yield and N uptake lasted for at least one growing season while the effects on soil properties were longer lasting. Soil P can contribute to crop P uptake for >4 yr after N-based manure or compost application had ceased. The residual effects of manure and compost applications significantly increased soil electrical conductivity and pH levels and plant-available P and NO3–N concentrations. Four years after the last application, P leaching to a soil depth of 45 to 60 cm was observed with N-based manure or compost application. No residual effects of manure and compost applications on soil NH4–N were observed. Averaged across years, soil total C concentrations or quantities were not different among the treatments, indicating that total C was not a sensitive indicator. Residual effects of N- or P-based manure or compost application increased crop production for one year and influenced soil properties for several years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual effects of N- and P-based manure and compost applications on corn grain yield and N uptake lasted at least one growing season.

Treatment
N- and P-based manure and compost applicationse2
Outcome
corn grain yield and N uptakee2
Direction
lastede2
Qualifier
for at least one growing seasone2
Comparator
no-treatment checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“Residual effects of N- and P-based manure and compost applications on corn grain yield and N uptake lasted for at least one growing season while the effects on soil properties were longer lasting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual effects of N- and P-based manure and compost applications on soil properties were longer lasting than the effects on yield.

Treatment
N- and P-based manure and compost applicationse2
Outcome
soil propertiese2
Direction
longer lastinge2
Comparator
no-treatment checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“Residual effects of N- and P-based manure and compost applications on corn grain yield and N uptake lasted for at least one growing season while the effects on soil properties were longer lasting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–696 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P contributed to crop P uptake for more than 4 years after N-based manure or compost application ended.

Treatment
N-based manure or compost applicatione2
Outcome
crop P uptakee2
Direction
contributee2
Qualifier
>4 yre2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“Soil P can contribute to crop P uptake for >4 yr after N-based manure or compost application had ceased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure and compost applications significantly increased soil electrical conductivity and pH levels.

Treatment
manure and compost applicationse2
Outcome
soil electrical conductivity and pH levelse2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Comparator
no-treatment checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“The residual effects of manure and compost applications significantly increased soil electrical conductivity and pH levels and plant-available P and NO3–N concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–972 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure and compost applications significantly increased plant-available P and NO3–N concentrations in soil.

Treatment
manure and compost applicationse2
Outcome
plant-available P and NO3–N concentrationse2
Direction
significantly increasede2
Comparator
no-treatment checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“The residual effects of manure and compost applications significantly increased soil electrical conductivity and pH levels and plant-available P and NO3–N concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–972 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four years after the last application, P leaching to 45 to 60 cm depth was observed with N-based manure or compost application.

Treatment
N-based manure or compost applicatione2
Outcome
P leachinge2
Qualifier
to a soil depth of 45 to 60 cme2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four years after the last application, P leaching to a soil depth of 45 to 60 cm was observed with N-based manure or compost application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure and compost applications had no residual effect on soil NH4–N.

Treatment
manure and compost applicationse2
Outcome
soil NH4–Ne2
Direction
No residual effectse2
Comparator
no-treatment checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“No residual effects of manure and compost applications on soil NH4–N were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1194 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil total C concentrations or quantities did not differ among the treatments.

Outcome
soil total C concentrations or quantitiese2
Direction
not differente2
Comparator
among the treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across years, soil total C concentrations or quantities were not different among the treatments, indicating that total C was not a sensitive indicator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1355 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Total C was not a sensitive indicator of the treatment effects on soil.

Outcome
total Ce2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e2

“Averaged across years, soil total C concentrations or quantities were not different among the treatments, indicating that total C was not a sensitive indicator”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual effects of N- or P-based manure or compost application increased crop production for one year.

Treatment
N- or P-based manure or compost applicatione3
Outcome
crop productione3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
for one yeare3
Comparator
no-treatment checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“chemical fertilizer, and no-treatment check on corn (Zea mays L.) production and soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–388 · show in text ↑
e3

“Residual effects of N- or P-based manure or compost application increased crop production for one year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1459 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.