Paper · 2003 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Overwintering of Heliothis virescens (F.) and Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Cotton Fields of Northeast Mississippi

John C. Schneider

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Following the 1995–2001 crop seasons, population densities of pupae of tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (F.), and corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), overwintering in cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS, were estimated by digging a total of 43,542 m-row. Densities of pupae varied greatly among years with the highest densities occurring in years with low rainfall in the late summer and early fall. The sex ratio of pupae was variable and significantly male-biased in some years. The total area-wide, tobacco budworm population emerging from all overwintering sites was estimated from catches in pheromone traps whose absolute efficiency is known. After the introduction of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt)-transgenic cotton in 1996 but before a several-fold increase in use of herbicide resistant (HR)-transgenic cotton cultivars in 2001, local cotton fields accounted for <2% of the total overwintered tobacco budworm population. In the pretransgenic cotton production era, it is estimated cotton fields typically accounted for <10% of the overwintered tobacco budworm population. Driving surveys of the tillage status of cotton fields and pheromone trapping to determine the timing of adult emergence in the spring indicate that—until the 2000 crop season—postseason tillage destroyed most tobacco budworm and corn earworm pupae overwintering in cotton fields. Adoption of HR-transgenic cultivars has quintupled cotton field area planted no-till, but the contribution of cotton fields to overwintered tobacco budworm populations has remained low. Preemptive tillage of cotton fields to kill overwintering tobacco budworm pupae would not appreciably suppress in-season population densities of this pest. However, the absence of such tillage might increase the rate at which the tobacco budworm develops resistance to insecticides and counteradaptation to antibiotic host plant resistance traits including the Bt-transgenic trait.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pupal densities were highest in years with low rainfall in the late summer and early fall.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Interactor
Heliothis virescensHeliothis virescense1pest
Second interactor
Helicoverpa zeaHelicoverpa zeae1pest
Outcome
Densities of pupaee2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
years with low rainfall in the late summer and early falle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heliothis virescens
Heliothis virescens · Interactorxpda · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · Second interactorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e1

“population densities of pupae of tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (F.), and corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), overwintering in cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 47–197 · show in text ↑
e2

“Densities of pupae varied greatly among years with the highest densities occurring in years with low rainfall in the late summer and early fall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sex ratio of overwintering pupae was variable and significantly male-biased in some years.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Outcome
sex ratio of pupaee3
Qualifier
significantly male-biased in some yearse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e3

“The sex ratio of pupae was variable and significantly male-biased in some years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–519 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local cotton fields accounted for <2% of the total overwintered tobacco budworm population after Bt-transgenic cotton was introduced.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Interactor
tobacco budworme4pest
Outcome
total overwintered tobacco budworm populatione4
Value
<2%e4
Qualifier
After the introduction of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt)-transgenic cotton in 1996e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e4

“local cotton fields accounted for <2% of the total overwintered tobacco budworm population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–975 · show in text ↑
e5

“After the introduction of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt)-transgenic cotton in 1996”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the pretransgenic era cotton fields typically accounted for <10% of the overwintered tobacco budworm population.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Interactor
tobacco budworme6pest
Outcome
overwintered tobacco budworm populatione6
Value
<10%e6
Qualifier
pretransgenic cotton production erae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e6

“In the pretransgenic cotton production era, it is estimated cotton fields typically accounted for <10% of the overwintered tobacco budworm population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postseason tillage destroyed most tobacco budworm and corn earworm pupae overwintering in cotton fields until the 2000 crop season.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
postseason tillagee7
Interactor
tobacco budworme7pest
Second interactor
corn earwormHelicoverpa zeae7pest
Outcome
pupae overwintering in cotton fieldse7
Direction
destroyed moste7
Qualifier
until the 2000 crop seasone7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · Second interactorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e7

“until the 2000 crop season—postseason tillage destroyed most tobacco budworm and corn earworm pupae overwintering in cotton fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adoption of HR-transgenic cultivars quintupled the cotton field area planted no-till.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
HR-transgenic cultivarse1
Outcome
cotton field area planted no-tille1
Direction
quintuplede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adoption of HR-transgenic cultivars has quintupled cotton field area planted no-till”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1409–1493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The contribution of cotton fields to overwintered tobacco budworm populations has remained low.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Interactor
tobacco budworme1pest
Outcome
contribution of cotton fields to overwintered tobacco budworm populationse1
Direction
remained lowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e1

“the contribution of cotton fields to overwintered tobacco budworm populations has remained low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Preemptive tillage would not appreciably suppress in-season tobacco budworm population densities.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
Preemptive tillage of cotton fieldse1
Interactor
tobacco budworme1pest
Outcome
in-season population densitiese1
Direction
would not appreciably suppresse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e1

“Preemptive tillage of cotton fields to kill overwintering tobacco budworm pupae would not appreciably suppress in-season population densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1595–1736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effecthypothesisoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Absence of tillage might increase the rate at which tobacco budworm develops insecticide resistance.

Taxon
Gossypium hirsutum L.Gossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
absence of such tillagee1
Outcome
rate at which the tobacco budworm develops resistance to insecticidese1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton fields, Gossypium hirsutum L., in Monroe County, MS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–242 · show in text ↑
e1

“the absence of such tillage might increase the rate at which the tobacco budworm develops resistance to insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1876 · show in text ↑

tillage · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.