Abstract
The present study was conducted in the Experimental Farm, El-Khattara region, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt during 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 seasons. The study aimed to investigate the effect of nitrogen fertilizer levels (50, 75, 100 and 125 kg N/fad.) and biofertilization treatments (control, cerialine, potassiomag as well as cerialine + potassiomag) on yield and its attributes as well as juice quality of sugar beet under drip irrigation in sandy soils. Nitrogen fertilizer level had significant effect on all traits in the two seasons and their combined analysis. Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad., caused significant increase in root dimensions (length and diameter), fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant, Na%, K%, sugar loss in molasses percentage (SLM%) and root yield/fad. Top and recoverable sugar yields were responded only to 100 kg N/fad. The highest averages of sugar%, purity% and extractable sugar % were produced from using low nitrogen levels (either 50 or 75 kg N/fad.). Biofertilization treatments had significant effect on root length, fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant, Na%, K% as well as top and root yields/fad. However, root diameter, sucrose%, alpha amino N%, purity%, SLM% and alkaline coefficient (AC) did not significantly influenced by applying biofertilizers. The highest recoverable sugar yield/fad., could be obtained by using either cerialine alone or in combination with potassiomag. The interaction between studied factors revealed significant effect on fresh root weight/ plant, sucrose%, Na% and extractable sugar%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen from 50 to 125 kg N/fad. significantly increased root length and diameter.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEET
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- root dimensions (length and diameter)e0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 50e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad., caused significant increase in root dimensions (length and diameter)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen from 50 to 125 kg N/fad. significantly increased fresh top weight per plant.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- fresh top weight/plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 50e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad., caused significant increase in root dimensions (length and diameter), fresh top weight/plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen from 50 to 125 kg N/fad. significantly increased fresh root weight per plant.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- fresh root weight/plante0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 50e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad., caused significant increase in root dimensions (length and diameter), fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen from 50 to 125 kg N/fad. significantly increased root sodium and potassium percentages.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- Na%, K%e0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 50e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad., caused significant increase in root dimensions (length and diameter), fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant, Na%, K%”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen from 50 to 125 kg N/fad. significantly increased sugar loss in molasses percentage.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- sugar loss in molasses percentage (SLM%)e0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 50e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad., caused significant increase in root dimensions (length and diameter), fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant, Na%, K%, sugar loss in molasses percentage (SLM%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen from 50 to 125 kg N/fad. significantly increased root yield per faddan.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- root yield/fad.e0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- 50e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Increasing N fertilizer levels from 50 to 125 kg N/fad., caused significant increase in root dimensions (length and diameter), fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant, Na%, K%, sugar loss in molasses percentage (SLM%) and root yield/fad.”
Claim · model-written summary
Top and recoverable sugar yields responded only up to 100 kg N/fad.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 100 kg N/fad.e0
- Outcome
- Top and recoverable sugar yieldse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Top and recoverable sugar yields were responded only to 100 kg N/fad.”
Claim · model-written summary
Low nitrogen levels of 50 or 75 kg N/fad. produced the highest sugar percentage.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- low nitrogen levels (either 50 or 75 kg N/fad.)e0
- Outcome
- sugar%e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“The highest averages of sugar%, purity% and extractable sugar % were produced from using low nitrogen levels (either 50 or 75 kg N/fad.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Low nitrogen levels of 50 or 75 kg N/fad. produced the highest purity percentage.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- low nitrogen levels (either 50 or 75 kg N/fad.)e0
- Outcome
- purity%e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“The highest averages of sugar%, purity% and extractable sugar % were produced from using low nitrogen levels (either 50 or 75 kg N/fad.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Low nitrogen levels of 50 or 75 kg N/fad. produced the highest extractable sugar percentage.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- low nitrogen levels (either 50 or 75 kg N/fad.)e0
- Outcome
- extractable sugar %e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“The highest averages of sugar%, purity% and extractable sugar % were produced from using low nitrogen levels (either 50 or 75 kg N/fad.).”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization significantly affected root length and fresh top and root weights.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Biofertilization treatmentse0
- Outcome
- root length, fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plante0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Biofertilization treatments had significant effect on root length, fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization significantly affected sodium and potassium percentages.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Biofertilization treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Na%, K%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Biofertilization treatments had significant effect on root length, fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant, Na%, K%”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilization significantly affected top and root yields.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Biofertilization treatmentse0
- Outcome
- top and root yields/fad.e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“Biofertilization treatments had significant effect on root length, fresh top weight/plant, fresh root weight/plant, Na%, K% as well as top and root yields/fad.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers did not significantly affect root diameter, sucrose percentage or alpha amino nitrogen percentage.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- applying biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- root diameter, sucrose%, alpha amino N%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“root diameter, sucrose%, alpha amino N%, purity%, SLM% and alkaline coefficient (AC) did not significantly influenced by applying biofertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers did not significantly affect purity, sugar loss in molasses or alkaline coefficient.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- applying biofertilizerse0
- Outcome
- purity%, SLM% and alkaline coefficient (AC)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“root diameter, sucrose%, alpha amino N%, purity%, SLM% and alkaline coefficient (AC) did not significantly influenced by applying biofertilizers”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerialine alone produced a highest recoverable sugar yield per faddan.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- cerialine alonee0
- Outcome
- recoverable sugar yield/fad.e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“The highest recoverable sugar yield/fad., could be obtained by using either cerialine alone or in combination with potassiomag.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cerialine combined with potassiomag produced a highest recoverable sugar yield per faddan.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- cerialine alone or in combination with potassiomage0
- Outcome
- recoverable sugar yield/fad.e0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“The highest recoverable sugar yield/fad., could be obtained by using either cerialine alone or in combination with potassiomag.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen and biofertilization interacted significantly for fresh root weight per plant and sucrose percentage.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- interaction between studied factorse0
- Outcome
- fresh root weight/ plant, sucrose%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“The interaction between studied factors revealed significant effect on fresh root weight/ plant, sucrose%”
Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen and biofertilization interacted significantly for sodium and extractable sugar percentages.
- Taxon
- SUGAR BEETBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- interaction between studied factorse0
- Outcome
- Na% and extractable sugar%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“SUGAR BEET”
e0“The interaction between studied factors revealed significant effect on fresh root weight/ plant, sucrose%, Na% and extractable sugar%.”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
64 papers more in this group
See all 68 papers →nitrogen · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
104 papers more in this group
See all 108 papers →fertilization · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →nitrogen · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
157 papers more in this group
See all 161 papers →fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
263 papers more in this group
See all 267 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.