Paper · 2013 · Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science

METHANE EMISSION FROM DIRECT SEEDED RICE UNDER THE INFLUENCES OF RICE STRAW AND NITRIFICATION INHIBITOR

A. Wihardjaka; S. Djalal Tandjung; B. Hendro Sunarminto; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Incorporation of rice straw into soil is a common practice to improve soil productivity and increase inorganic fertilizer availability. However, this practice could contribute to methane (CH4) emission; one of the greenhouse gases that causes global warming. Nitrification inhibitors such as neem cake and carbofuran may reduce methane emission following application of rice straw. The study aimed to evaluate the application of rice straw and nitrification inhibitor to methane emission in rainfed lowland rice system. A factorial randomized block design was used with three replications. The first factor was rice straw incorporation (5 t ha-1 fresh straw, 5 t ha-1 composted straw), and the second factor was nitrification inhibitor application (20 kg ha-1 neem cake, 20 kg ha-1 carbofuran). The experiment was conducted at rainfed lowland in Pati, Central Java, during 2009/2010 wet season. Ciherang variety was planted as direct seeded rice with spacing of 20 cm x 20 cm in each plot of 4 m x 5 m. The rice straw was treated together with soil tillage, whereas nitrification inhibitor was applied together with urea application. Parameters observed were methane flux, plant height, plant biomass, grain yield, organic C content, and bacterial population in soil. The methane flux and soil organic C were measured at 25, 45, 60, 75, and 95 days after emergence. The results showed that composted rice straw incorporation significantly emitted methane lower (73.2 ± 6.6 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1) compared to the fresh rice straw (93.5 ± 4.0 CH4 ha-1 season-1). Application of nitrification inhibitors neem cake and carbofuran reduced methane emission as much as 20.7 and 15.4 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1, respectively. Under direct seeded rice system, methane flux level correlated with plant biomass as shown by linear regression of Y = 0.0015 X + 0.0575 (R2 = 0.2305, n = 27). This means that higher plant biomass produced more methane flux. The study indicates that application of nitrification inhibitors such as neem cake is prospective in decreasing methane emission from direct seeded rice cropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Composted rice straw emitted significantly less methane than fresh straw: 73.2 ± 6.6 versus 93.5 ± 4.0 per season.

Treatment
composted rice straw incorporatione0
Outcome
methanee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
73.2 ± 6.6 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1e0
Qualifier
93.5 ± 4.0 CH4 ha-1 season-1e0
Comparator
fresh rice strawe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“DIRECT SEEDED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“composted rice straw incorporation significantly emitted methane lower (73.2 ± 6.6 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1) compared to the fresh rice straw (93.5 ± 4.0 CH4 ha-1 season-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake reduced methane emission by 20.7 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1.

Treatment
neem cakee0
Outcome
methane emissione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“DIRECT SEEDED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of nitrification inhibitors neem cake and carbofuran reduced methane emission as much as 20.7 and 15.4 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran reduced methane emission by 15.4 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1.

Treatment
carbofurane0
Outcome
methane emissione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15.4 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“DIRECT SEEDED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of nitrification inhibitors neem cake and carbofuran reduced methane emission as much as 20.7 and 15.4 kg CH4 ha-1 season-1, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1710 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methane flux increased with rice plant biomass under direct seeding.

Organ / stage
plant biomasse0
Outcome
methane fluxe0
Direction
moree0
Value
R2 = 0.2305e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“DIRECT SEEDED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“methane flux level correlated with plant biomass as shown by linear regression of Y = 0.0015 X + 0.0575 (R2 = 0.2305, n = 27). This means that higher plant biomass produced more methane flux.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1935 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors regard neem cake as promising for decreasing methane from direct-seeded rice.

Outcome
decreasing methane emission from direct seeded rice croppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“DIRECT SEEDED RICE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of nitrification inhibitors such as neem cake is prospective in decreasing methane emission from direct seeded rice cropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2097 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

organic · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 22 positive, 3 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 199 positive, 20 negative or no effect

198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

botanical · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.