Paper · 2022 · Journal of Cotton Research

The efficacy of chemical topping in field-grown cotton is mediated by drip irrigation amount in irrigated agricultural area

Yu TIAN; Baopeng LIAO; Huanyong HAN; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Cotton production in China is challenged by high labor input including manual topping (MT). Recently, to replace MT in the Xinjiang cotton region of China, mepiquat chloride (MC) was applied once more than the traditional multiple-application; this was designated as chemical topping (CT), but it is unclear whether the amount of irrigation needs to be adjusted to accommodate CT. Results The main plots were assigned to three drip irrigation amounts [300 (I 1 ), 480 (I 2 ), and 660 (I 3 ) mm], and the subplots were assigned to the CT treatments [450 (MC 1 ), 750 (MC 2 ), and 1 050 (MC 3 ) mL·hm −2 25% MC] with MT as a control that was performed after early bloom. The optimum drip irrigation amount for CT was explored based on leaf photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, biomass accumulation, and yield. There were significant influences of drip irrigation, topping treatments and their interaction on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, gas exchange parameters and biomass accumulation characteristics as well as yield. The combination of I 2 and MC 2 (I 2 MC 2 ) performed best. Compared with I 2 MT, the net photosynthetic rate ( P n), stomatal conductance ( G s), transpiration rate ( T r), and photochemical quenching coefficient ( q P) of I 2 MC 2 significantly increased by 4.0%∼7.2%, 6.8%∼17.1%, 5.2%∼17.6%, and 4.8%∼9.6%, respectively, from the peak flowering to boll opening stages. Moreover, I 2 MC 2 showed fast reproductive organ biomass accumulation and the highest seed cotton yield; the latter was 6.6%∼12.8% higher than that of I 2 MT. Further analysis revealed that a 25% MC emulsion in water (MC EW ) application resulted in yield improvement by increasing P n, φPSII, and q P to promote biomass accumulation and transport to reproductive organs. Conclusion The results showed that the 480 mm drip irrigation combined with 750 mL·hm −2 MC increased the rate of dry matter accumulation in reproductive organs by increasing P n, φ PSII, and q P to improve photosynthetic performance, thus achieving higher yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation, topping, and their interaction significantly influenced fluorescence, gas exchange, biomass, and yield.

Treatment
drip irrigation, topping treatments and their interactione0
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, gas exchange parameters and biomass accumulation characteristics as well as yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant influences of drip irrigation, topping treatments and their interaction on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, gas exchange parameters and biomass accumulation characteristics as well as yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–1055 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 MC2 performed best.

Treatment
I 2 MC 2e0
Outcome
performed beste0
Direction
performed beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combination of I 2 and MC 2 (I 2 MC 2 ) performed best.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 MC2 increased net photosynthetic rate 4.0%–7.2% versus I2 MT.

Organ / stage
peak flowering to boll opening stagese0
Treatment
I 2 MC 2e0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.0%∼7.2%e0
Comparator
I 2 MTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I 2 MT, the net photosynthetic rate ( P n), stomatal conductance ( G s), transpiration rate ( T r), and photochemical quenching coefficient ( q P) of I 2 MC 2 significantly increased by 4.0%∼7.2%, 6.8%∼17.1%, 5.2%∼17.6%, and 4.8%∼9.6%, respectively, from the peak flowering to boll opening stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 MC2 increased stomatal conductance 6.8%–17.1% versus I2 MT.

Treatment
I 2 MC 2e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.8%∼17.1%e0
Comparator
I 2 MTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I 2 MT, the net photosynthetic rate ( P n), stomatal conductance ( G s), transpiration rate ( T r), and photochemical quenching coefficient ( q P) of I 2 MC 2 significantly increased by 4.0%∼7.2%, 6.8%∼17.1%, 5.2%∼17.6%, and 4.8%∼9.6%, respectively, from the peak flowering to boll opening stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 MC2 increased transpiration rate 5.2%–17.6% versus I2 MT.

Treatment
I 2 MC 2e0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.2%∼17.6%e0
Comparator
I 2 MTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I 2 MT, the net photosynthetic rate ( P n), stomatal conductance ( G s), transpiration rate ( T r), and photochemical quenching coefficient ( q P) of I 2 MC 2 significantly increased by 4.0%∼7.2%, 6.8%∼17.1%, 5.2%∼17.6%, and 4.8%∼9.6%, respectively, from the peak flowering to boll opening stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 MC2 increased photochemical quenching coefficient 4.8%–9.6% versus I2 MT.

Treatment
I 2 MC 2e0
Outcome
photochemical quenching coefficiente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.8%∼9.6%e0
Comparator
I 2 MTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with I 2 MT, the net photosynthetic rate ( P n), stomatal conductance ( G s), transpiration rate ( T r), and photochemical quenching coefficient ( q P) of I 2 MC 2 significantly increased by 4.0%∼7.2%, 6.8%∼17.1%, 5.2%∼17.6%, and 4.8%∼9.6%, respectively, from the peak flowering to boll opening stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 MC2 had rapid reproductive organ biomass accumulation.

Organ / stage
reproductive organe0
Treatment
I 2 MC 2e0
Outcome
reproductive organ biomass accumulatione0
Direction
faste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“I 2 MC 2 showed fast reproductive organ biomass accumulation and the highest seed cotton yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1532 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I2 MC2 gave the highest seed cotton yield, 6.6%–12.8% above I2 MT.

Treatment
I 2 MC 2e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.6%∼12.8%e0
Comparator
I 2 MTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“I 2 MC 2 showed fast reproductive organ biomass accumulation and the highest seed cotton yield; the latter was 6.6%∼12.8% higher than that of I 2 MT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MC EW was interpreted to improve yield by increasing photosynthetic measures and promoting biomass transport to reproductive organs.

Treatment
25% MC emulsion in water (MC EW ) applicatione0
Outcome
yield improvemente0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
increasing P n, φPSII, and q P to promote biomass accumulation and transport to reproductive organse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 25% MC emulsion in water (MC EW ) application resulted in yield improvement by increasing P n, φPSII, and q P to promote biomass accumulation and transport to reproductive organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1619–1800 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑

mepiquat chloride · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

chloride · physiology: gas exchange · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

mepiquat chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 59 positive, 11 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

chloride · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 67 positive, 11 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

mepiquat chloride · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

chloride · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.