Paper · 2022 · Agrarian Bulletin of the

Application of the growth regulator “Edagum SM” on winter wheat crops in the Republic of North Ossetia – Alania

A. Tedeyeva; V. Tedeyeva

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract. The authors present the results of the use of a growth regulator on winter wheat crops in the conditions of the steppe zone of the Republic of North Ossetia – Alania. The purpose of the work is to study the influence of the growth regulator “Edagum SM” on the growth, development, productivity and quality of grain of promising winter wheat varieties, taking into account ecological and economic efficiency and improving on this basis the resource-saving technology of culture cultivation in the conditions of the steppe zone of the Russian Federation. The novelty lies in the fact that the features of the growth and development of promising winter wheat varieties have been studied depending on the doses of the growth regulator “Edagum SM” and their effect on the photosynthetic activity of plants has been shown. Optimal seeding rates of promising varieties have been established, ensuring high crop productivity and improving the quality indicators of the products obtained. The object of research were high-yielding varieties of winter wheat – Homer and Bagrat, selected by the P. P. Lukyanenko National Research Center. Methods. Records and observations were carried out according to generally accepted methods described in the educational and methodological manual for conducting research in agronomy. Results. As a result of the use of a growth regulator, for Homer and Bagrat varieties, the best option is “Edagum SM” (450 ml/ha), and the optimal seeding rate is 5 mln/ha (Gomer variety) and 4 mln/ha (Bagrat variety). The greatest increase in photosynthetic power was observed during the period of exit into the tube-earing. The net photosynthesis productivity of winter wheat increased from the tillering phase to the exit phase into the tube and the maximum indicators reached during earing-milk ripeness. The crop yield, depending on the dose of the growth regulator, increased by 0.13–0.22 t/ha (Homer variety, seeding rate 3 mln/ha). The grain nature index, depending on the studied variants, varied between 691–722 g/l (Homer variety) and 689–720 g/l (Bagrat variety). The protein content varied in the range of 10.1–13.2 % a. s. v., and gluten – 24–26 %. Profitability ranged from 22–47 %.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For the winter wheat varieties Homer and Bagrat the best option was the growth regulator Edagum SM at 450 ml/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Homer and Bagrat varietiese0
Treatment
Edagum SMe0
Outcome
best optione0
Value
450 ml/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“for Homer and Bagrat varieties, the best option is “Edagum SM” (450 ml/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1449 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal seeding rate for the Homer (Gomer) variety was 5 mln/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Gomer varietye0
Outcome
optimal seeding ratee0
Value
5 mln/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“the optimal seeding rate is 5 mln/ha (Gomer variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1507 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal seeding rate for the Bagrat variety was 4 mln/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Bagrat varietye0
Outcome
optimal seeding ratee1
Value
4 mln/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“4 mln/ha (Bagrat variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1537 · show in text ↑
e1

“the optimal seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1479 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest increase in photosynthetic power occurred during the period of exit into the tube-earing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
photosynthetic powere0
Direction
greatest increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The greatest increase in photosynthetic power was observed during the period of exit into the tube-earing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1644 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthesis productivity of winter wheat increased from tillering to exit into the tube and peaked during earing-milk ripeness.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
net photosynthesis productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net photosynthesis productivity of winter wheat increased from the tillering phase to the exit phase into the tube and the maximum indicators reached during earing-milk ripeness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop yield increased by 0.13–0.22 t/ha depending on the growth regulator dose (Homer, seeding rate 3 mln/ha).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Homer varietye0
Treatment
the dose of the growth regulatore0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.13–0.22 t/hae0
Qualifier
seeding rate 3 mln/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The crop yield, depending on the dose of the growth regulator, increased by 0.13–0.22 t/ha (Homer variety, seeding rate 3 mln/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1829–1958 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grain nature index of Homer varied between 691 and 722 g/l across variants.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Homer varietye0
Outcome
grain nature indexe0
Value
691–722 g/le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain nature index, depending on the studied variants, varied between 691–722 g/l (Homer variety) and 689–720 g/l (Bagrat variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2094 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The grain nature index of Bagrat varied between 689 and 720 g/l across variants.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Bagrat varietye0
Outcome
grain nature indexe0
Value
689–720 g/le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The grain nature index, depending on the studied variants, varied between 691–722 g/l (Homer variety) and 689–720 g/l (Bagrat variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2094 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein content varied between 10.1 and 13.2 % a. s. v.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
protein contente0
Value
10.1–13.2 % a. s. v.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The protein content varied in the range of 10.1–13.2 % a. s. v., and gluten – 24–26 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2096–2181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gluten content varied between 24 and 26 %.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
glutene0
Value
24–26 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“The protein content varied in the range of 10.1–13.2 % a. s. v., and gluten – 24–26 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2096–2181 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profitability ranged from 22 to 47 %.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Profitabilitye0
Value
22–47 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–63 · show in text ↑
e0

“Profitability ranged from 22–47 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2183–2216 · show in text ↑

class · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 100 positive, 17 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.