Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Potassium application timing to improve corn K-fertilizer use in the oat-corn sequence: a tracer study for high yielding corn

Bruno Cocco Lago; José Laércio Favarin; Rodrigo Estevam Munhoz de Almeida; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Corn performance is often unchanged by modifying the potassium fertilizer application timing, especially when soil K is not a limiting factor. Consequently, there is no literature reporting K timing on K-fertilizer contribution (or use) in high-yielding corn fields. We evaluated corn performance and K-fertilizer use based on timings of K-fertilizer application in the oat-corn sequence at subtropical environment with highly weathered soils. Additionally, we propose a timing strategy to ensure high corn use of fertilizer. The crop sequence study was conducted in two field experiments to investigate corn performance with respect to K-leaf, K uptake, and yield. Additionally, we evaluated K-fertilizer use by rubidium as potassium derived from fertilizer and potassium use efficiency. Application timings were two before and three during corn growth and development. Timings did not change corn performance even for late K application, and this was attributed mainly to soil K sufficiency levels. Corn K-fertilizer use, on the other hand, was different and higher for timings before (versus during) corn growth and development. Importantly, timing of K application ∼22 days before corn sowing improved corn K-fertilizer use approximately 2-fold versus the two late timings. Timings in oat or during corn sowing were identical for corn K-fertilizer use. We link our rainfall data with literature K-fertilizer movement (positional aspect), and the corn ability to acquire it. Application of K at 3-weeks before corn sowing constituted the optimal timing for fertilizer supply. This finding will assist farmers in large-scale areas to manage K-fertilizer application to promote higher efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing did not change corn performance.

Treatment
Timingse0
Outcome
corn performancee0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timings did not change corn performance even for late K application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–938 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potassium application timing to improve corn K-fertilizer use in the oat-corn sequence: a tracer study for high yielding corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn fertilizer potassium use was higher for applications before growth than during growth.

Treatment
timings beforee0
Outcome
Corn K-fertilizer usee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
duringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn K-fertilizer use, on the other hand, was different and higher for timings before (versus during) corn growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying potassium about 22 days before sowing approximately doubled corn fertilizer use versus late timings.

Treatment
K application ∼22 days before corn sowinge0
Outcome
corn K-fertilizer usee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
approximately 2-folde0
Comparator
the two late timingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“timing of K application ∼22 days before corn sowing improved corn K-fertilizer use approximately 2-fold versus the two late timings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat timing and corn sowing timing had identical corn fertilizer potassium use.

Treatment
Timings in oate0
Outcome
corn K-fertilizer usee0
Direction
identicale0
Comparator
during corn sowinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timings in oat or during corn sowing were identical for corn K-fertilizer use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1355 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identified three weeks before sowing as optimal potassium supply timing.

Treatment
Application of K at 3-weeks before corn sowinge0
Outcome
optimal timing for fertilizer supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of K at 3-weeks before corn sowing constituted the optimal timing for fertilizer supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1577 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

potassium · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.