Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Microbiology

The Microbial Metagenome of Eluates Obtained From the Surface of Broccoli Heads Subjected to Different Light Treatments

Shixian Zeng; Jingchun Cui; Jinliang Xiong; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Foodborne illnesses present a major threat to public health and are frequently attributed to foodborne pathogens present on fresh produce. Some opportunistic pathogens of broccoli are also responsible for causing head rot. Three different light treatments, UV-C, red LED (50 μml/m 2 /s), and UV-C + LED were used to treat broccoli prior to or during storage. Following the light treatments, microorganisms present in eluates obtained from the surface of broccoli heads were characterized using a metagenomic approach. Metagenomic DNA libraries were subjected to high-throughput sequencing on an Illumina Hiseq platform. Results indicated that the combined treatment of LED red light and UV-C provided the best sensory preservation of broccoli, followed by LED red light and then UV-C. The bacterial communities in the eluates obtained from the surface of broccoli heads in all three light treatments were primarily represented at the phylum level by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes , while fungal communities were primarily represented by Ascomycota and Basidiomycota . Further analysis indicated that the all three light treatments reduced the presence of foodborne pathogens and bacterial taxa responsible for broccoli spoilage. While UV-C had a significant inhibitory effect on Botrytis cinerea , the light treatments increased the relative abundance of Pseudomonas fluorescens . Results indicate that a metagenomic approach can be used to detect pathogenic bacteria and fungi on fresh vegetables and assess the impact of management practices, such as light treatments, designed to maintain postharvest quality, on the composition of the microbiome present on the surface of harvested produce.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined LED red light and UV-C best preserved broccoli sensory quality.

Treatment
LED red light and UV-Ce0
Outcome
sensory preservatione0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
LED red light and then UV-Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined treatment of LED red light and UV-C provided the best sensory preservation of broccoli, followed by LED red light and then UV-C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria and Firmicutes predominated among surface bacterial communities under all light treatments.

Interactor
ProteobacteriaPseudomonadotae0other
Second interactor
FirmicutesBacillotae0other
Outcome
bacterial communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bacterial communities in the eluates obtained from the surface of broccoli heads in all three light treatments were primarily represented at the phylum level by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascomycota and Basidiomycota predominated among surface fungal communities under all light treatments.

Interactor
AscomycotaAscomycotae0other
Second interactor
BasidiomycotaBasidiomycotae0other
Outcome
fungal communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungal communities were primarily represented by Ascomycota and Basidiomycota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1065 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three light treatments reduced foodborne pathogens on broccoli.

Treatment
all three light treatmentse0
Outcome
presence of foodborne pathogense0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all three light treatments reduced the presence of foodborne pathogens and bacterial taxa responsible for broccoli spoilage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three light treatments reduced broccoli spoilage bacteria.

Treatment
all three light treatmentse0
Outcome
bacterial taxa responsible for broccoli spoilagee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all three light treatments reduced the presence of foodborne pathogens and bacterial taxa responsible for broccoli spoilage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C significantly inhibited Botrytis cinerea.

Treatment
UV-Ce0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
Botrytis cinereae0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-C had a significant inhibitory effect on Botrytis cinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1295 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light treatments increased relative abundance of Pseudomonas fluorescens.

Treatment
light treatmentse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0other
Outcome
relative abundance of Pseudomonas fluorescense0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“light treatments increased the relative abundance of Pseudomonas fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1302–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metagenomics could detect pathogenic microbes and assess postharvest light-treatment effects on vegetable surface microbiomes.

Outcome
detect pathogenic bacteria and fungie0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a metagenomic approach can be used to detect pathogenic bacteria and fungi on fresh vegetables and assess the impact of management practices, such as light treatments, designed to maintain postharvest quality, on the composition of the microbiome present on the surface of harvested produce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broccoli Heads”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–79 · show in text ↑

light · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

uv · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

light · organism · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.