Paper · 2022 · Plants

Photoperiod Affects Node Appearance Rate and Flowering in Early Maturing Soybean

Nathaniel W. W. Ort; Malcolm J. Morrison; Elroy R. Cober; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

(L.) Merr.) with long days increasing the time to flowering. Early flowering cultivars have been developed from breeding programs for environments with long photoperiods; however, this effect is challenging to isolate in field experiments because of other environmental influences. Our experiment examined the effect of photoperiod on the node appearance rate and time to flower for 13 early maturing soybean cultivars ranging in maturity group (MG) between 000.9 and 1.3. Growth chambers were programmed to 14, 15, 16, and 17 h photoperiods and temperature was kept at 25 °C. The date of emergence and main stem node appearance were recorded until flowering. The node appearance rate was slowest for the first node and increased thereafter. All cultivars required more time to flowering in the longer photoperiod treatments and the later rated MG had the greatest sensitivity to photoperiod. A delay in time to flower from a longer photoperiod can delay maturity and expose the crop to fall frost that can reduce seed yield and quality. Understanding and documentation of soybean photoperiod sensitivity will help plant breeders develop suitable cultivars for environments with long photoperiods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In early maturing soybean the node appearance rate was slowest for the first node and increased thereafter.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
node appearance ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The node appearance rate was slowest for the first node and increased thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Early Maturing Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All soybean cultivars required more time to flowering in the longer photoperiod treatments.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
longer photoperiod treatmentse0
Outcome
time to floweringe0
Direction
more timee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All cultivars required more time to flowering in the longer photoperiod treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Early Maturing Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The later rated maturity-group cultivars had the greatest sensitivity to photoperiod.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
later rated MGe0
Outcome
sensitivity to photoperiode0
Direction
greateste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the later rated MG had the greatest sensitivity to photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Early Maturing Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–80 · show in text ↑

light · phenology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 11 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.