Abstract

Nitrogen fertilizer and planting density are key factors affecting rice yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency. There is still a need to optimize nitrogen fertilizer and planting density management for high yield. We studied the effects of different quantities of nitrogen application (N0 0 kg ha−1, N1 120 kg ha−1, N2 180 kg ha−1) and planting density (low-density: 18.8 hills m−2; high-density: 37.5 hills m−2) on rice yield, photosynthetic characteristics, antioxidant system, and nitrogen use efficiency. ANOVA results indicated that most tested traits were affected by environment, planting density, N application, and their interactions. Comparing the results of low-density planting, high-density planting increased the panicle number by 21.12% but decreased the grain number per panicle and yield by 3.97% and 22.48%, respectively. Similarly, the superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities and PFPn (partial factor productivity of nitrogen) decreased by 8.20%, 6.99%, 16.41%, 14.28%, and 5.73%, respectively, while HIn (N harvest index) increased by 1.32%. Compared to no N application, N application treatments increased the panicle number, grain number per panicle, and yield by 9.92%, 17.64%, and 37.83% in the N1 treatment; and increased by 17.15%, 29.09%, and 128.94% in the N2 treatment, respectively. N application significantly increased net photosynthetic rates and enzyme activities of antioxidant antioxidases. Compared with N1, N2 decreased REn (apparent recovery efficiency of N), AEn (agronomic N use efficiency), and PFPn by 8.98%, 11.80%, and 25.14%, respectively, while, compared with N0, N1 increased HIn by 8.50%. It was observed that nitrogen fertilizer and planting density had an interaction effect on the net photosynthetic rate, antioxidant enzyme activities, and PFPn and HIn. Given a comprehensive consideration, it is best to apply nitrogen at a rate of 120 kg ha−1 at the planting density of 37.5 hills m−2 for high grain yield and high N use efficiency in our experimental site.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested rice traits were affected by environment, density, nitrogen and their interactions.

Outcome
most tested traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most tested traits were affected by environment, planting density, N application, and their interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting increased panicle number by 21.12%.

Treatment
high-density plantinge0
Outcome
panicle numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.12%e0
Comparator
Different Fertilizer N Inputs and Planting Densityt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high-density planting increased the panicle number by 21.12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Different Fertilizer N Inputs and Planting Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting decreased grain number per panicle by 3.97%.

Treatment
high-density plantinge0
Outcome
grain number per paniclee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high-density planting increased the panicle number by 21.12% but decreased the grain number per panicle and yield by 3.97% and 22.48%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting decreased yield by 22.48%.

Treatment
high-density plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
22.48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high-density planting increased the panicle number by 21.12% but decreased the grain number per panicle and yield by 3.97% and 22.48%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting decreased SOD activity by 8.20%.

Treatment
planting densityt0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities and PFPn (partial factor productivity of nitrogen) decreased by 8.20%, 6.99%, 16.41%, 14.28%, and 5.73%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Different Fertilizer N Inputs and Planting Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting decreased CAT activity by 6.99%.

Treatment
planting densityt0
Outcome
catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
6.99%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities and PFPn (partial factor productivity of nitrogen) decreased by 8.20%, 6.99%, 16.41%, 14.28%, and 5.73%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Different Fertilizer N Inputs and Planting Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting decreased POD activity by 16.41%.

Treatment
planting densityt0
Outcome
peroxidase (POD)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.41%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities and PFPn (partial factor productivity of nitrogen) decreased by 8.20%, 6.99%, 16.41%, 14.28%, and 5.73%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Different Fertilizer N Inputs and Planting Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting decreased APX activity by 14.28%.

Treatment
planting densityt0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activitiese0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
14.28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activities and PFPn (partial factor productivity of nitrogen) decreased by 8.20%, 6.99%, 16.41%, 14.28%, and 5.73%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Different Fertilizer N Inputs and Planting Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting decreased PFPn by 5.73%.

Treatment
planting densityt0
Outcome
PFPn (partial factor productivity of nitrogen)e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PFPn (partial factor productivity of nitrogen) decreased by 8.20%, 6.99%, 16.41%, 14.28%, and 5.73%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Different Fertilizer N Inputs and Planting Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-density planting increased HIn by 1.32%.

Treatment
planting densityt0
Outcome
HIn (N harvest index)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HIn (N harvest index) increased by 1.32%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice under Different Fertilizer N Inputs and Planting Density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1 increased panicle number by 9.92% versus no nitrogen.

Treatment
N1 treatmente0
Outcome
panicle numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.92%e0
Comparator
no N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to no N application, N application treatments increased the panicle number, grain number per panicle, and yield by 9.92%, 17.64%, and 37.83% in the N1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1 increased grain number per panicle by 17.64%.

Treatment
N1 treatmente0
Outcome
grain number per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.64%e0
Comparator
no N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to no N application, N application treatments increased the panicle number, grain number per panicle, and yield by 9.92%, 17.64%, and 37.83% in the N1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1 increased yield by 37.83%.

Treatment
N1 treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.83%e0
Comparator
no N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to no N application, N application treatments increased the panicle number, grain number per panicle, and yield by 9.92%, 17.64%, and 37.83% in the N1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 increased panicle number by 17.15%.

Treatment
N2 treatmente0
Outcome
Grain Yieldt0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased by 17.15%, 29.09%, and 128.94% in the N2 treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grain Yield, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Antioxidant Enzymes of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 increased grain number per panicle by 29.09%.

Treatment
N2 treatmente0
Outcome
grain number per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.09%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application treatments increased the panicle number, grain number per panicle, and yield by 9.92%, 17.64%, and 37.83% in the N1 treatment; and increased by 17.15%, 29.09%, and 128.94% in the N2 treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 increased yield by 128.94%.

Treatment
N2 treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
128.94%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application treatments increased the panicle number, grain number per panicle, and yield by 9.92%, 17.64%, and 37.83% in the N1 treatment; and increased by 17.15%, 29.09%, and 128.94% in the N2 treatment, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N application significantly increased net photosynthetic rates and antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rates and enzyme activities of antioxidant antioxidasese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N application significantly increased net photosynthetic rates and enzyme activities of antioxidant antioxidases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2 lowered REn, AEn and PFPn relative to N1 by 8.98%, 11.80% and 25.14%, respectively.

Treatment
N2e0
Outcome
REn (apparent recovery efficiency of N), AEn (agronomic N use efficiency), and PFPne0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.98%, 11.80%, and 25.14%e0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with N1, N2 decreased REn (apparent recovery efficiency of N), AEn (agronomic N use efficiency), and PFPn by 8.98%, 11.80%, and 25.14%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1494–1651 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N1 increased HIn by 8.50% relative to N0.

Treatment
N1e0
Outcome
HIne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.50%e0
Comparator
N0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with N0, N1 increased HIn by 8.50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 120 kg ha−1 nitrogen at 37.5 hills m−2 for high yield and nitrogen-use efficiency.

Outcome
apply nitrogen at a rate of 120 kg ha−1 at the planting density of 37.5 hills m−2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is best to apply nitrogen at a rate of 120 kg ha−1 at the planting density of 37.5 hills m−2 for high grain yield and high N use efficiency in our experimental site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1911–2078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–68 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · soil: biology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

density · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.