Paper · 2021 · Egyptian Journal of Chemistry

Effect of nano, bio, chemical fertilization and leaves extract of moringa plant on flowering and chemical constituents of gladiolus plant

Atef Sarhan; Afaf Habib; Ali Fahmy; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pot experiments were carried out during two successive seasons of 2018/2019 and 2019/2020 at the experimental farm of Horticulture Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt to study the effect of different types of fertilizers, traditional NPK (t-NPK) at 2.0 g/pot, nano NPK (n-NPK) at 0.5 and 1.0 g/l, active dry yeast extract (ADYE) at 5.0 and 10.0 g/l, moringa leaves extract (MLE) at 5.0 and 10.0%, and some combinations (ADYE at 5.0 g/l + MLE at 5.0%, MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1.0 g/l and ADYE at 10.0 g/l + n-NPK at 1.0 g/l) as well as untreated plants (control) on flowering and some chemical constituents of Gladiolus grandiflorus cv. Rose Suprem. The results showed that MLE at 10% produced the highest values for number of florets/spike and spike stem length (cm) followed by MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l which gave the highest values in case of spike stem diameter (cm), flower diameter (cm), fresh and dry weights of cut spike (g). On the other hand, chemical constituents of chlorophyll a, b, carotenoids of fresh leaves (mg/g), N, P, K and total carbohydrates (%) were influenced by different fertilization treatments, the mastery in this concern was to application of MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l. It could be recommended that application of Gladiolus grandiflorus cv. Rose Suprem by MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l to get the best results regarding flowering and chemical constituents

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moringa leaf extract at 10% gave the highest number of florets per spike and the longest spike stem in gladiolus.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
MLE at 10%e0
Outcome
number of florets/spike and spike stem lengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“MLE at 10% produced the highest values for number of florets/spike and spike stem length (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moringa leaf extract at 10% plus nano NPK at 1 g/l gave the highest spike stem diameter and flower diameter in gladiolus.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/le0
Outcome
spike stem diameter (cm), flower diametere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l which gave the highest values in case of spike stem diameter (cm), flower diameter (cm), fresh and dry weights of cut spike (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moringa leaf extract at 10% plus nano NPK at 1 g/l gave the highest fresh and dry weights of cut spike in gladiolus.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/le0
Outcome
fresh and dry weights of cut spikee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l which gave the highest values in case of spike stem diameter (cm), flower diameter (cm), fresh and dry weights of cut spike (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization treatments influenced leaf chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids in gladiolus; the best was MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
different fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b, carotenoidse0
Qualifier
MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/le0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“chemical constituents of chlorophyll a, b, carotenoids of fresh leaves (mg/g), N, P, K and total carbohydrates (%) were influenced by different fertilization treatments, the mastery in this concern was to application of MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization treatments influenced leaf N, P and K in gladiolus; the best was MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
different fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
N, P, Ke0
Qualifier
MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/le0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“chemical constituents of chlorophyll a, b, carotenoids of fresh leaves (mg/g), N, P, K and total carbohydrates (%) were influenced by different fertilization treatments, the mastery in this concern was to application of MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization treatments influenced total carbohydrates in gladiolus; the best was MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
different fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
total carbohydratese0
Qualifier
MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/le0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“gladiolus plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“chemical constituents of chlorophyll a, b, carotenoids of fresh leaves (mg/g), N, P, K and total carbohydrates (%) were influenced by different fertilization treatments, the mastery in this concern was to application of MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1226 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend applying MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l to gladiolus cv. Rose Suprem for best flowering and chemical constituents.

Taxon
Gladiolus grandiflorusGladiolus grandifloruse0
Treatment
MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/le0
Outcome
best results regarding flowering and chemical constituentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus grandiflorus
Gladiolus grandiflorus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryYercaud-elango · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Gladiolus grandiflorus cv. Rose Suprem by MLE at 10% + n-NPK at 1 g/l to get the best results regarding flowering and chemical constituents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1411 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · GladiolusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · GladiolusResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · yield · GladiolusResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · GladiolusResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · GladiolusResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.