Paper · 2021 · The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

IDENTIFICATION OF NOVELROOT-KNOT NEMATODE (MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA) RESISTANT TOMATO GENOTYPES

A.H. El-Sappah; M.M. Islam; S.A. Rather; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
19
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Root-knot nematode is one of the most serious causes of biotic stress that negatively affect tomato production in China. The robust methodology to overcome this problem is growing resistant cultivars. This study's core purpose is to identify new root-knot nematode (RKN) resistant tomato genotypes out of all 13 available under controlled environmental conditions. After nematode inoculation; morphological, biochemical, and molecular analysis were performed. We observed obvious phenotypic changes in plant height, root length, and root dry weight among all13 genotypes. In comparison with control, nematode infection caused significant halt in plant height in all susceptible genotypes. Three genotypes M3, M7, and M11 were recorded with the lowest values of root gall index and reproduction index. These three genotypes displayed the significantly highest level of resistance compounds; total phenol, ortho-dihydroxy phenol, IAA oxidase, chlorogenic acid, and ascorbic acid contents as compared to the susceptible M82 genotype. Following six molecular markers Mint-1, C&B, TG180, REX-1, JB-1, and Mi23were employed to amplify Mi-genes. Only Mint-1marker successfully amplified a 622bp fragment in M3, M7, and M11genotypes. These findings proved that M3, M7, and M11 harbour root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi 1.1. So, we recommend only M3, M7, and M11 genotypes of tomato for future cultivation to avoid losses caused by RKN infection. Keywords: Biochemical assay, Meloidogyne incognita, Mi-resistance genes, Molecular marker, Solanum lycopersicum.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 13 tomato genotypes differed in plant height, root length and root dry weight.

Material
genotypese0
Outcome
plant height, root length, and root dry weighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“obvious phenotypic changes in plant height, root length, and root dry weight among all13 genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematode infection significantly halted height in susceptible tomato genotypes.

Material
susceptible genotypese0
Treatment
nematode infectione0
Interactor
nematodeNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
halte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematode infection caused significant halt in plant height in all susceptible genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M3, M7 and M11 had the lowest root gall index.

Material
M3, M7, and M11e0
Outcome
root gall indexe0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three genotypes M3, M7, and M11 were recorded with the lowest values of root gall index and reproduction index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M3, M7 and M11 had the lowest nematode reproduction index.

Material
M3, M7, and M11e0
Outcome
reproduction indexe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three genotypes M3, M7, and M11 were recorded with the lowest values of root gall index and reproduction index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M3, M7 and M11 had higher total phenol, ortho-dihydroxy phenol and IAA oxidase than M82.

Outcome
total phenol, ortho-dihydroxy phenol, IAA oxidasee0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
susceptible M82 genotypee0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These three genotypes displayed the significantly highest level of resistance compounds; total phenol, ortho-dihydroxy phenol, IAA oxidase, chlorogenic acid, and ascorbic acid contents as compared to the susceptible M82 genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M3, M7 and M11 had higher chlorogenic and ascorbic acid contents than M82.

Outcome
chlorogenic acid, and ascorbic acid contentse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
susceptible M82 genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These three genotypes displayed the significantly highest level of resistance compounds; total phenol, ortho-dihydroxy phenol, IAA oxidase, chlorogenic acid, and ascorbic acid contents as compared to the susceptible M82 genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mint-1 amplified a 622bp fragment in M3, M7 and M11.

Material
M3, M7, and M11genotypese0
Gene
Mint-1markere0
Outcome
amplified a 622bp fragmente0
Value
622bpe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only Mint-1marker successfully amplified a 622bp fragment in M3, M7, and M11genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M3, M7 and M11 were inferred to harbour Mi 1.1.

Material
M3, M7, and M11e0
Gene
Mi 1.1e0
Outcome
harbour root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi 1.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M3, M7, and M11 harbour root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi 1.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO GENOTYPES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend M3, M7 and M11 for cultivation to avoid nematode losses.

Material
M3, M7, and M11e0
Outcome
M3, M7, and M11 genotypes of tomato for future cultivatione0
Qualifier
to avoid losses caused by RKN infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we recommend only M3, M7, and M11 genotypes of tomato for future cultivation to avoid losses caused by RKN infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1440 · show in text ↑

infection · Nematoda · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.