Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

An Unexpected Regulatory Sequence from Rho-Related GTPase6 Confers Fiber-Specific Expression in Upland Cotton

Baoxia Li; Liuqin Zhang; Jing Xi; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton fibers, single seed trichomes derived from ovule epidermal cells, are the major source of global textile fibers. Fiber-specific promoters are desirable to study gene function and to modify fiber properties during fiber development. Here, we revealed that Rho-related GTPase6 (GhROP6) was expressed preferentially in developing fibers. A 1240 bp regulatory region of GhROP6, which contains a short upstream regulatory sequence, the first exon, and the partial first intron, was unexpectedly isolated and introduced into transgenic cotton for analyzing promoter activity. The promoter of GhROP6 (proChROP6) conferred a specific expression in ovule surface, but not in the other floral organs and vegetative tissues. Reverse transcription PCR analysis indicated that proGhROP6 directed full-length transcription of the fused ß-glucuronidase (GUS) gene. Further investigation of GUS staining showed that proChROP6 regulated gene expression in fibers and ovule epidermis from fiber initiation to cell elongation stages. The preferential activity was enriched in fiber cells after anthesis and reached to peak on flowering days. By comparison, proGhROP6 was a mild promoter with approximately one-twenty-fifth of the strength of the constitutive promoter CaMV35S. The promoter responded to high-dosage treatments of auxin, gibberellin and salicylic acid and slightly reduced GUS activity under the in vitro treatment. Collectively, our data suggest that the GhROP6 promoter has excellent activity in initiating fibers and has potential for bioengineering of cotton fibers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GhROP6 was preferentially expressed in developing fibers.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Organ / stage
developing fiberse0
Gene
GhROP6e0
Outcome
expressed preferentially in developing fiberse0

Verbatim

e0

“Rho-related GTPase6 (GhROP6) was expressed preferentially in developing fibers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–340 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The GhROP6 promoter drove specific expression on the ovule surface but not other floral or vegetative tissues.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Gene
GhROP6e0
Outcome
specific expression in ovule surface, but not in the other floral organs and vegetative tissuese0

Verbatim

e0

“The promoter of GhROP6 (proChROP6) conferred a specific expression in ovule surface, but not in the other floral organs and vegetative tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

proGhROP6 directed full-length GUS transcription.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Gene
proGhROP6e0
Outcome
full-length transcription of the fused ß-glucuronidase (GUS) genee0

Verbatim

e0

“proGhROP6 directed full-length transcription of the fused ß-glucuronidase (GUS) gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

proChROP6 regulated expression in fibers and ovule epidermis from initiation to elongation.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Gene
proChROP6e0
Outcome
gene expression in fibers and ovule epidermis from fiber initiation to cell elongation stagese0

Verbatim

e0

“proChROP6 regulated gene expression in fibers and ovule epidermis from fiber initiation to cell elongation stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Promoter activity in fiber cells peaked on flowering days.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Organ / stage
fiber cells after anthesise0
Outcome
preferential activitye0
Direction
reached to peake0

Verbatim

e0

“The preferential activity was enriched in fiber cells after anthesis and reached to peak on flowering days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

proGhROP6 strength was approximately one-twenty-fifth of CaMV35S.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Gene
proGhROP6e0
Outcome
strengthe0
Value
approximately one-twenty-fifthe0
Comparator
CaMV35Se0

Verbatim

e0

“proGhROP6 was a mild promoter with approximately one-twenty-fifth of the strength of the constitutive promoter CaMV35S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-dose auxin treatment slightly reduced promoter GUS activity in vitro.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
auxine0
Outcome
GUS activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The promoter responded to high-dosage treatments of auxin, gibberellin and salicylic acid and slightly reduced GUS activity under the in vitro treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-dose gibberellin treatment slightly reduced promoter GUS activity in vitro.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
gibberelline0
Outcome
GUS activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The promoter responded to high-dosage treatments of auxin, gibberellin and salicylic acid and slightly reduced GUS activity under the in vitro treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-dose salicylic acid treatment slightly reduced promoter GUS activity in vitro.

Taxon
Upland Cottont0
Treatment
salicylic acide0
Outcome
GUS activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
in vitroe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The promoter responded to high-dosage treatments of auxin, gibberellin and salicylic acid and slightly reduced GUS activity under the in vitro treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1418 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–109 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · molecular: expression · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

class · molecular: expression · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.