Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Fruit Science

Mango Stem Response under Different Irrigation Regimes

Federico Hahn; Jesús Antonio García

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mexico has dominated the international mango trade having high yields and excellent fruit quality. The use of soil, plant and environmental sensors can monitor plant hydric status and optimize water application. Linear resistance dendrometers were developed and installed in a high-density 8-year old commercial mango orchard during two seasons; 10 in 2019 and 40 in 2020. Stem diameter fluctuations were acquired every 10 minutes to obtain maximum diameter (MXD), minimum diameter (MND), morning slope (MS) and afternoon slope (AS). Mango stem response during flowering, fruit-fall and fruit-growth was analyzed after applying daily irrigation (DI) or reduced deficit irrigation (RDI). Yield was similar for both treatments, but water use efficiency was higher with deficit irrigation. A new variable known as negative integral (NI) was obtained from the dendrometer signature after adding all the values between 8:00 and 18:00. NI provided a stem shrinkage magnitude, peaks attributed to transpiration and slopes showing flow transport to and from the trunk. NI presented a high correlation of 0.85 against T7 during the flowering stage for RDI-1. If NI crossed zero, a severe stress was present; a high AS present in the evening, indicates nutrient solution provided to fruits. Fruit yield depends on panicle number and fruit-drop during the first production stages, being RDI-1 more efficient in retaining fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was similar under daily and reduced deficit irrigation.

Treatment
reduced deficit irrigation (RDI)e1
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
daily irrigation (DI)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was similar for both treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–724 · show in text ↑
e1

“daily irrigation (DI) or reduced deficit irrigation (RDI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was higher under deficit irrigation.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
daily irrigation (DI)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency was higher with deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“daily irrigation (DI) or reduced deficit irrigation (RDI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The NI variable captured stem shrinkage, transpiration peaks, and transport slopes.

Outcome
stem shrinkage magnitude, peaks attributed to transpiration and slopes showing flow transporte0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NI provided a stem shrinkage magnitude, peaks attributed to transpiration and slopes showing flow transport to and from the trunk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NI correlated 0.85 with T7 at flowering under RDI-1.

Organ / stage
flowering stagee0
Treatment
RDI-1e0
Outcome
correlatione0
Value
0.85e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NI presented a high correlation of 0.85 against T7 during the flowering stage for RDI-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NI crossing zero indicated severe stress.

Outcome
severe stresse0
Qualifier
NI crossed zeroe0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If NI crossed zero, a severe stress was present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high evening AS indicated nutrient solution delivery to fruit.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Outcome
nutrient solution provided to fruitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a high AS present in the evening, indicates nutrient solution provided to fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit yield depended on panicle number and early fruit drop.

Organ / stage
paniclee0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Qualifier
fruit-drop during the first production stagese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield depends on panicle number and fruit-drop during the first production stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI-1 retained fruits more efficiently.

Treatment
RDI-1e0
Outcome
retaining fruitse0
Direction
more efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RDI-1 more efficient in retaining fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 32 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Irrigation tripled mango fruit retention versus no irrigation.

    A New Approach for Analyzing and Interpreting Data on Fruit Drop in Mango · 2014 · compared with non-irrigated control

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Two irrigations produced the most panicles per plant, 137.33.

    Effect Of Irrigation On Harvesting Time And Yield In Mango (Mangifera indica L.) · 2013 · compared with irrigation was given at 15th of each month starting from October and continued up to March

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.