Paper · 2022 · Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental

Saline water irrigation strategies and potassium fertilization on physiology and fruit production of yellow passion fruit

Geovani S. de Lima; Francisco W. A. Pinheiro; Hans R. Gheyi; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of saline water irrigation management strategies and potassium doses on the concentration of photosynthetic pigments, gas exchange, and fruit production of ‘BRS GA1’ yellow passion fruit. The experiment was carried out under field conditions using a randomized block design, with treatments based on a 6 × 2 factorial scheme, related to six management strategies for irrigation with saline water (irrigation with low-salinity water throughout the crop cycle-WS; irrigation with high-salinity water in the vegetative stage-VE; flowering stage-FL; fruiting stage-FR; and successively in vegetative/flowering stages-VE/FL and vegetative/fruiting stages-VE/FR) and two doses of potassium (60 and 100% of the recommendation), with four replicates. The dose of 100% recommendation corresponded to 345 g of K2O plant-1 year-1. High electrical conductivity irrigation water (4.0 dS m-1) was used in different phenological stages according to treatment, alternating with water of low electrical conductivity (1.3 dS m-1). The synthesis of chlorophyll a and b, stomatal conductance, instantaneous carboxylation efficiency and water use efficiency of ‘BRS GA1’ yellow passion fruit were reduced under irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1 in all strategies adopted. Fertilization with 60% of the K recommendation promoted greater number of fruits and yellow passion fruit yield. Irrigation with 4.0 dS m-1 water in the vegetative/flowering and flowering stages reduced the yield of yellow passion fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation at 4.0 dS m-1 reduced chlorophyll a and b synthesis across all strategies.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Material
‘BRS GA1’e0
Treatment
irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1e0
Outcome
synthesis of chlorophyll a and be0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in all strategies adoptede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The synthesis of chlorophyll a and b, stomatal conductance, instantaneous carboxylation efficiency and water use efficiency of ‘BRS GA1’ yellow passion fruit were reduced under irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1 in all strategies adopted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation at 4.0 dS m-1 reduced stomatal conductance across all strategies.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Material
‘BRS GA1’e0
Treatment
irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in all strategies adoptede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The synthesis of chlorophyll a and b, stomatal conductance, instantaneous carboxylation efficiency and water use efficiency of ‘BRS GA1’ yellow passion fruit were reduced under irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1 in all strategies adopted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation at 4.0 dS m-1 reduced instantaneous carboxylation efficiency across all strategies.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Material
‘BRS GA1’e0
Treatment
irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1e0
Outcome
instantaneous carboxylation efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in all strategies adoptede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The synthesis of chlorophyll a and b, stomatal conductance, instantaneous carboxylation efficiency and water use efficiency of ‘BRS GA1’ yellow passion fruit were reduced under irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1 in all strategies adopted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation at 4.0 dS m-1 reduced water use efficiency across all strategies.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Material
‘BRS GA1’e0
Treatment
irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1e0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in all strategies adoptede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The synthesis of chlorophyll a and b, stomatal conductance, instantaneous carboxylation efficiency and water use efficiency of ‘BRS GA1’ yellow passion fruit were reduced under irrigation with water of 4.0 dS m-1 in all strategies adopted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 60% of recommended potassium increased fruit number.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
60% of the K recommendatione0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with 60% of the K recommendation promoted greater number of fruits and yellow passion fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 60% of recommended potassium increased passion fruit yield.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
60% of the K recommendatione0
Outcome
yellow passion fruit yielde0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization with 60% of the K recommendation promoted greater number of fruits and yellow passion fruit yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High salinity irrigation in vegetative and flowering stages reduced passion fruit yield.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Treatment
Irrigation with 4.0 dS m-1 water in the vegetative/floweringe0
Outcome
yield of yellow passion fruite0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with 4.0 dS m-1 water in the vegetative/flowering and flowering stages reduced the yield of yellow passion fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High salinity irrigation in the flowering stage reduced passion fruit yield.

Taxon
yellow passion fruite0
Organ / stage
flowering stagese0
Treatment
Irrigation with 4.0 dS m-1 watere0
Outcome
yield of yellow passion fruite0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation with 4.0 dS m-1 water in the vegetative/flowering and flowering stages reduced the yield of yellow passion fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1555 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Passiflora edulis (passion fruit)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.