Abstract
Field experiment was conducted in Giza, Egypt, during two growing seasons of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 on garlic crop, with the objective of investigating the effect of different irrigation levels (60, 80 and 100 % of water requirements and their combination with the foliar spraying applications of agrispon (with 0.5 and 1.0 ml/ liter) on growth and yield. The results indicated that increased irrigation level up to 100% led to increased vegetative characters of garlic and that the lowest growth and productivity was obtained by 60% irrigation level. When considering spray application of agrispon; with 1.0 ml/L increased growth and productivity followed by 0.5 ml/L; while control treatment gave the lowest productivity during the both seasons. Interaction effect between irrigation level and agrispon treatments indicated that 100% irrigation level combined with 1.0 ml/L spray application of agrispon gave the highest garlic productivity followed by 100% irrigation level combined with 0.5 ml/L spray application. The chemical analysis showed that the highest NPK was obtained by 100% irrigation level combined with 1.0 ml/L agrispon application during the both seasons. Regarding water footprint, the highest irrigation water footprint was obtained by 80% irrigation level followed by 60% irrigation level, while the lowest footprint was obtained by 100% irrigation level due to high garlic productivity under 100% irrigation level. The estimate water footprint for garlic was 525 m 3 /ton. The blue water footprint for garlic was 422 m 3 /ton about 80% form total water footprint, while gray water percentage about 20% with value of 103 m 3 /ton.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation level up to 100% increased vegetative characters of garlic.
- Taxon
- Garlic
Allium sativumt0 - Treatment
- irrigation level up to 100%e1
- Outcome
- vegetative characterse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- Giza, Egypte2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e1“The results indicated that increased irrigation level up to 100% led to increased vegetative characters of garlic and that the lowest growth and productivity was obtained by 60% irrigation level”
e2“Field experiment was conducted in Giza, Egypt, during two growing seasons of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 on garlic crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The 60% irrigation level gave the lowest garlic growth and productivity.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- 60% irrigation levele1
- Outcome
- growth and productivitye1
- Direction
- loweste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e1“The results indicated that increased irrigation level up to 100% led to increased vegetative characters of garlic and that the lowest growth and productivity was obtained by 60% irrigation level”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar spraying with 1.0 ml/L agrispon increased garlic growth and productivity.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- spray application of agrispone2
- Outcome
- growth and productivitye2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Qualifier
- 1.0 ml/Le2
- Comparator
- control treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e2“When considering spray application of agrispon; with 1.0 ml/L increased growth and productivity followed by 0.5 ml/L; while control treatment gave the lowest productivity during the both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
The control treatment without agrispon gave the lowest garlic productivity.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- spray application of agrispone2
- Outcome
- productivitye2
- Direction
- loweste2
- Comparator
- control treatmente2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e2“When considering spray application of agrispon; with 1.0 ml/L increased growth and productivity followed by 0.5 ml/L; while control treatment gave the lowest productivity during the both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
100% irrigation combined with 1.0 ml/L agrispon gave the highest NPK in garlic.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- 100% irrigation level combined with 1.0 ml/L agrispon applicatione3
- Outcome
- NPKe3
- Direction
- higheste3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e3“The chemical analysis showed that the highest NPK was obtained by 100% irrigation level combined with 1.0 ml/L agrispon application during the both seasons”
Claim · model-written summary
100% irrigation combined with 1.0 ml/L agrispon spray gave the highest garlic productivity.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- 100% irrigation level combined with 1.0 ml/L spray application of agrispone4
- Outcome
- garlic productivitye4
- Direction
- higheste4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e4“100% irrigation level combined with 1.0 ml/L spray application of agrispon gave the highest garlic productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
80% irrigation level gave the highest irrigation water footprint in garlic.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- 80% irrigation levele5
- Outcome
- irrigation water footprinte5
- Direction
- higheste5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e5“the highest irrigation water footprint was obtained by 80% irrigation level followed by 60% irrigation level”
Claim · model-written summary
100% irrigation level gave the lowest water footprint in garlic.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Treatment
- 100% irrigation levele6
- Outcome
- footprinte6
- Direction
- loweste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e6“the lowest footprint was obtained by 100% irrigation level due to high garlic productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
The estimated water footprint for garlic was 525 m 3 /ton.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Outcome
- water footprint for garlice7
- Value
- 525 m 3 /tone7
- Setting
- Giza, Egypte2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e7“The estimate water footprint for garlic was 525 m 3 /ton”
e2“Field experiment was conducted in Giza, Egypt, during two growing seasons of 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 on garlic crop”
Claim · model-written summary
The blue water footprint for garlic was 422 m 3 /ton, about 80% of the total water footprint.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Outcome
- blue water footprint for garlice1
- Value
- 422 m 3 /tone1
- Qualifier
- about 80% form total water footprinte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e1“The blue water footprint for garlic was 422 m 3 /ton about 80% form total water footprint”
Claim · model-written summary
The gray water footprint for garlic was 103 m 3 /ton, about 20% of the total water footprint.
- Taxon
- GarlicAllium sativumt0
- Outcome
- gray water percentagee1
- Value
- 103 m 3 /tone1
- Qualifier
- about 20%e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Water Footprint for Garlic”
e1“gray water percentage about 20% with value of 103 m 3 /ton”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · physiology: water · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →irrigation · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →application · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.