Paper · 2021 · Symbiosis

From isolation to application: a case study of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of the Arabian Peninsula

Mohamed N. Al-Yahya’ei; Janusz Błaszkowski; Hamood Al-Hashmi; et al.

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
11
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract The vegetation in the Arabian Peninsula experiences drought, heat, soil salinity, and low fertility, mainly due to low phosphorus (P) availability. The beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is a key factor supporting plant growth under such environmental conditions. Therefore, AMF strains isolated from these soils might be useful as biotechnological tools for agriculture and revegetation practices in the region. Here we present a pioneering program to isolate, identify, and apply AMF isolated from rhizosphere soils of agricultural and natural habitats, namely date palm plantations and five native desert plants, respectively in the Southern Arabian Peninsula. We established taxonomically unique AMF species as single-spore cultures as part of an expanding collection of AMF strains adapted to arid ecosystems. Preliminary experiments were conducted to evaluate the abilities of these AMF strains to promote seedling growth of a main crop Phoenix dactylifera L. and a common plant Prosopis cineraria L. (Druce) in the Arabian Peninsula. The results showed that inoculation with certain AMF species enhanced the growth of both plants, highlighting the potential of these fungi as part of sustainable land use practices in this region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxonomically unique AMF species were established as single-spore cultures.

Outcome
single-spore culturese0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“We established taxonomically unique AMF species as single-spore cultures as part of an expanding collection of AMF strains adapted to arid ecosystems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with certain AMF species enhanced Phoenix dactylifera seedling growth.

Taxon
Phoenix dactylifera L.Phoenix dactyliferae0
Treatment
inoculation with certain AMF speciese1
Interactor
AMF speciese1symbiont
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedling growth of a main crop Phoenix dactylifera L. and a common plant Prosopis cineraria L. (Druce)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with certain AMF species enhanced the growth of both plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with certain AMF species enhanced Prosopis cineraria seedling growth.

Taxon
Prosopis cineraria L. (Druce)Prosopis cinerariae0
Treatment
inoculation with certain AMF speciese1
Interactor
AMF speciese1symbiont
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prosopis cineraria
Prosopis cineraria · TaxonLRBurdak · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedling growth of a main crop Phoenix dactylifera L. and a common plant Prosopis cineraria L. (Druce)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1075 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation with certain AMF species enhanced the growth of both plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1197 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Prosopis cinerariaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

inoculation · growth · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.