Paper · 2005 · PubMed

Allelopathic effects of weeds extracts against seed germination of some plants.

Izzet Kadioglu; Yusuf Yanar; Unal Asav

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
63
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigated the allelopathic effects of various weeds extracts on seed germination of 11 crop species. Most of the weed extracts tested had inhibitory effects on seed germination of common bean, tomato, pepper, squash, onion, barley, wheat, and corn at different application rates as compared with the 10% acetone control. Chickpea seed germination was inhibited by extracts of Solanum nigrum L., Chenopodium album L., and Matricaria chamomilla L. (10%, 20% and 22.5%, respectively) at the end of 21 day incubation period. However, Glycyrrhiza glabra L., Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., and Reseda lutea L. extracts stimulated chickpea seed germination at the rates of 95%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, compared to control. It was concluded that some of the weed extracts tested in this study could be used as inhibitor while others could be used as stimulator for the crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most tested weed extracts inhibited germination of eight named crops relative to acetone control.

Taxon
common bean, tomato, pepper, squash, onion, barley, wheat, and corne0
Treatment
weed extractse0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Comparator
10% acetone controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the weed extracts tested had inhibitory effects on seed germination of common bean, tomato, pepper, squash, onion, barley, wheat, and corn at different application rates as compared with the 10% acetone control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solanum nigrum extract inhibited chickpea germination by 10%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
extracts of Solanum nigrum L.e0
Interactor
Solanum nigrum L.Solanum nigrume0weed
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum nigrum
Solanum nigrum · InteractorHladac · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea seed germination was inhibited by extracts of Solanum nigrum L., Chenopodium album L., and Matricaria chamomilla L. (10%, 20% and 22.5%, respectively) at the end of 21 day incubation period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chenopodium album extract inhibited chickpea germination by 20%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Chenopodium album L.e0
Interactor
Chenopodium album L.Chenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea seed germination was inhibited by extracts of Solanum nigrum L., Chenopodium album L., and Matricaria chamomilla L. (10%, 20% and 22.5%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matricaria chamomilla extract inhibited chickpea germination by 22.5%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Matricaria chamomilla L.e0
Interactor
Matricaria chamomilla L.Matricaria chamomillae0weed
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
22.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Matricaria chamomilla
Matricaria chamomilla · InteractorRob Hille · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chickpea seed germination was inhibited by extracts of Solanum nigrum L., Chenopodium album L., and Matricaria chamomilla L. (10%, 20% and 22.5%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glycyrrhiza glabra extract stimulated chickpea germination at 95% relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Glycyrrhiza glabra L.e0
Interactor
Glycyrrhiza glabra L.Glycyrrhiza glabrae0weed
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
95%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glycyrrhiza glabra
Glycyrrhiza glabra · InteractorPharaoh han · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glycyrrhiza glabra L., Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., and Reseda lutea L. extracts stimulated chickpea seed germination at the rates of 95%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum halepense extract stimulated chickpea germination at 94% relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.e0
Interactor
Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.Sorghum halepensee0weed
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
94%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum halepense
Sorghum halepense · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glycyrrhiza glabra L., Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., and Reseda lutea L. extracts stimulated chickpea seed germination at the rates of 95%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–731 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reseda lutea extract stimulated chickpea germination at 93% relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Reseda lutea L. extractse0
Interactor
Reseda lutea L.Reseda luteae0weed
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
93%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Reseda lutea
Reseda lutea · InteractorTeunSpaans at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glycyrrhiza glabra L., Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., and Reseda lutea L. extracts stimulated chickpea seed germination at the rates of 95%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–731 · show in text ↑

Chenopodium album · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 44 positive, 28 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.