Paper · 1995 · Insect Science and Its Application

Efficacy of insecticidal applications based on calendar intervals and plant growth stages for control of insect pests on cowpea

Aliyageen M. Alghali

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Studies were carried out to compare the efficacy of insecticide schedules based on calendar intervals with those based on plant growth stages for the control of cowpea insect pests. Spray schedules based on calendar intervals and plant growth stage gave reasonable control of the pest complex and increased grain yields significantly. However, spray schedules based on plant growth stages alone were more efficient for two of the three cowpea varieties tested. This was attributed to differences in maturity periods which made spraying by regular calendar intervals slightly out of phase with attack by key insect pests. Thus, spray schedules based on plant growth stages are recommended for the control of insect pests of cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calendar-based insecticide schedules controlled the cowpea pest complex.

Treatment
Spray schedules based on calendar intervalse0
Interactor
pest complexe0pest
Outcome
control of the pest complexe0
Direction
controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray schedules based on calendar intervals and plant growth stage gave reasonable control of the pest complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“insect pests on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-stage insecticide schedules controlled the cowpea pest complex.

Treatment
plant growth stagee0
Interactor
pest complexe0pest
Outcome
control of the pest complexe0
Direction
controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray schedules based on calendar intervals and plant growth stage gave reasonable control of the pest complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–301 · show in text ↑
t0

“insect pests on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calendar-based schedules significantly increased cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
Spray schedules based on calendar intervalse0
Interactor
pest complexe0pest
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray schedules based on calendar intervals and plant growth stage gave reasonable control of the pest complex and increased grain yields significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–343 · show in text ↑
t0

“insect pests on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-stage schedules significantly increased cowpea grain yield.

Treatment
plant growth stagee0
Interactor
pest complexe0pest
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spray schedules based on calendar intervals and plant growth stage gave reasonable control of the pest complex and increased grain yields significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–343 · show in text ↑
t0

“insect pests on cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth-stage schedules were more efficient for two of three cowpea varieties tested.

Outcome
more efficiente0
Direction
more efficiente0
Value
two of the threee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spray schedules based on plant growth stages alone were more efficient for two of the three cowpea varieties tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–468 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend growth-stage spray schedules for cowpea insect pest control.

Interactor
insect pestse0pest
Outcome
spray schedules based on plant growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spray schedules based on plant growth stages are recommended for the control of insect pests of cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–738 · show in text ↑

application · control · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

stage · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 112 positive, 14 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.