Paper · 1972 · 損害保険研究

富士川丸事件(神戸地方裁判所の昭和47年2月23日の判決)の判決理由は不当である--船舶保険普通約款第4条第1号の解釈

照三 葛城

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Inefficient water management in rice paddy is responsible for a large quantity of water and nutrient loss, which causes tremendous economic and environmental costs. Yet, quantified data on the water and nutrient losses are limited. A study was conducted during 2018-2019 with an Aman (wet)-Boro (dry)-Aman (wet) rice rotation to evaluate the effect of water management on water and nutrient losses through different pathways. The treatments in 2018 Aman season were: (i) rainfed, (ii) I6D (irrigation after six days of ponded water disappearance), and (iii) I3D. In 2019, the Boro season had (i) I6D and (ii) I3D, and the Aman season had (i) rainfed, (ii) I9D, and (iii) I1D treatments. The water input and output from the studied lysimeters were measured daily, and samples from the leachates, ponded water, and topsoil were routinely analyzed for nutrient content. In both Aman seasons, the rainfed cultivation had lower percolation losses (38-44 % of total input) than other treatments (45-70 %). Evapotranspiration in the Boro season (5.4-5.9 mm/day) was higher than that in the Aman seasons (4.2-4.6 mm/day) because of the drier Boro season. Ammonium (NH4⁺-N) leached at 0.6-6.7 mg/L and nitrate (NO3⁻-N) 0.6-5.6 mg/L in these rice seasons. Phosphorus concentration ranged 0.04-0.37 mg/L in the leachates and 0.04-0.51 mg/L in the ponded water. The rainfed and I9D exerted higher nutrient leaching concentration in some events and less so for the I6D treatment than the I3D and I1D, possibly because of the better nitrification and preferential flow paths induced by the prolonged drying processes. However, the rainfed, I9D, and I6D had less leaching load than the I3D and I1D because the latter had larger percolation volume. For example, the I6D treatment in the Boro season reduced the N leaching load by 44 % and P load by 39 % compared with the I3D, and the I9D in 2019 Aman season had 42 and 13 % less N and P leaching load, respectively, than the I1D treatment. The findings will contribute to the effort of developing a sustainable and climate-resilient rice production system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed Aman rice had lower percolation losses than irrigated treatments in both seasons.

Treatment
rainfed cultivatione0
Outcome
percolation lossese0
Direction
lowere0
Value
38-44 % of total inpute0
Qualifier
45-70 %e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both Aman seasons, the rainfed cultivation had lower percolation losses (38-44 % of total input) than other treatments (45-70 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boro rice evapotranspiration was higher than Aman rice evapotranspiration.

Outcome
Evapotranspiratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.4-5.9 mm/daye0
Qualifier
4.2-4.6 mm/daye0
Comparator
Aman seasonse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evapotranspiration in the Boro season (5.4-5.9 mm/day) was higher than that in the Aman seasons (4.2-4.6 mm/day) because of the drier Boro season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium leached at 0.6-6.7 mg/L across the rice seasons.

Outcome
Ammonium (NH4⁺-N) leachede0
Value
0.6-6.7 mg/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium (NH4⁺-N) leached at 0.6-6.7 mg/L and nitrate (NO3⁻-N) 0.6-5.6 mg/L in these rice seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate leached at 0.6-5.6 mg/L across the rice seasons.

Outcome
nitrate (NO3⁻-N)e0
Value
0.6-5.6 mg/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium (NH4⁺-N) leached at 0.6-6.7 mg/L and nitrate (NO3⁻-N) 0.6-5.6 mg/L in these rice seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus concentration ranged from 0.04 to 0.37 mg/L in rice leachates.

Outcome
Phosphorus concentratione0
Value
0.04-0.37 mg/Le0
Qualifier
leachatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus concentration ranged 0.04-0.37 mg/L in the leachates and 0.04-0.51 mg/L in the ponded water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus concentration ranged from 0.04 to 0.51 mg/L in rice ponded water.

Outcome
Phosphorus concentratione0
Value
0.04-0.51 mg/Le0
Qualifier
ponded watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus concentration ranged 0.04-0.37 mg/L in the leachates and 0.04-0.51 mg/L in the ponded water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1349 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed and I9D rice treatments had higher nutrient leaching concentration in some events than I3D and I1D.

Treatment
rainfed and I9De0
Outcome
nutrient leaching concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in some eventse0
Comparator
I3D and I1De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rainfed and I9D exerted higher nutrient leaching concentration in some events and less so for the I6D treatment than the I3D and I1D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1486 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I6D rice treatment had lower nutrient leaching concentration than I3D and I1D in some events.

Treatment
I6D treatmente0
Outcome
nutrient leaching concentratione0
Direction
lesse0
Qualifier
in some eventse0
Comparator
I3D and I1De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rainfed and I9D exerted higher nutrient leaching concentration in some events and less so for the I6D treatment than the I3D and I1D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1350–1486 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed, I9D and I6D rice treatments had less leaching load than I3D and I1D.

Treatment
rainfed, I9D, and I6De0
Outcome
leaching loade0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
I3D and I1De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rainfed, I9D, and I6D had less leaching load than the I3D and I1D because the latter had larger percolation volume.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I3D and I1D rice treatments had larger percolation volume than rainfed, I9D and I6D.

Treatment
I3D and I1De0
Outcome
percolation volumee0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
rainfed, I9D, and I6De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rainfed, I9D, and I6D had less leaching load than the I3D and I1D because the latter had larger percolation volume.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1732 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I6D reduced Boro rice nitrogen leaching load by 44 % versus I3D.

Treatment
I6D treatmente0
Outcome
N leaching loade0
Direction
reducede0
Value
44 %e0
Qualifier
Boro seasone0
Comparator
I3De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I6D treatment in the Boro season reduced the N leaching load by 44 % and P load by 39 % compared with the I3D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1859 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I6D reduced Boro rice phosphorus leaching load by 39 % versus I3D.

Treatment
I6D treatmente0
Outcome
P loade0
Direction
reducede0
Value
39 %e0
Qualifier
Boro seasone0
Comparator
I3De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I6D treatment in the Boro season reduced the N leaching load by 44 % and P load by 39 % compared with the I3D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1859 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I9D had 42 % less nitrogen leaching load than I1D in the 2019 Aman rice season.

Treatment
I9De0
Outcome
N leaching loade2
Direction
lesse0
Value
42e0
Qualifier
2019 Aman seasone0
Comparator
I1D treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I9D in 2019 Aman season had 42 and 13 % less N and P leaching load, respectively, than the I1D treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–1974 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑
e2

“N leaching load”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

I9D had 13 % less phosphorus leaching load than I1D in the 2019 Aman rice season.

Treatment
I9De0
Outcome
P leaching loade0
Direction
lesse0
Value
13 %e0
Qualifier
2019 Aman seasone0
Comparator
I1D treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I9D in 2019 Aman season had 42 and 13 % less N and P leaching load, respectively, than the I1D treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–1974 · show in text ↑
e1

“these rice seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1244 · show in text ↑

rainfall · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

rainfall · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.