Paper · 1999 · Weed Technology

Evaluation of Several Herbicides for Burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus) Control in Corn (Zea mays)

David T. Messersmith; William S. Curran; Nathan L. Hartwig; et al.

11
claims
30
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A postemergence (POST) timing study was conducted on established populations of burcucumber ( Sicyos angulatus ) in corn ( Zea mays ), and a second study examined the residual activity of several herbicides for burcucumber control under greenhouse conditions. In the field study, flumiclorac, halosulfuron, primisulfuron, CGA 152005, and CGA 152005 + primisulfuron (45, 71, 40, 40, and 20 + 20 g ai/ha, respectively) were applied at two POST timings. CGA 152005, primisulfuron, and the combination provided greater than 85% control of burcucumber 14 wk after planting (WAP). Flumiclorac and halosulfuron provided 60% control or less by 8 WAP. Timing of the POST applications did not influence burcucumber control by 11 WAP with any herbicide. In the greenhouse, germinated burcucumber seeds were placed in soil treated with atrazine, chlorimuron, primisulfuron, or CGA 152005 at normal field use rates. All treatments provided similar residual control early; however by 4 wk after treatment (WAT), control from atrazine was less than 10% compared to 69% for chlorimuron and about 50% for primisulfuron and CGA 152005. This research suggests that CGA 152005 and primisulfuron can both be effective for managing burcucumber in corn, whereas flumiclorac and halosulfuron proved ineffective.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA 152005 controlled burcucumber by more than 85% at 14 WAP.

Treatment
CGA 152005e0
Interactor
burcucumbere0weed
Outcome
control of burcucumbere0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CGA 152005, primisulfuron, and the combination provided greater than 85% control of burcucumber 14 wk after planting (WAP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primisulfuron controlled burcucumber by more than 85% at 14 WAP.

Treatment
primisulfurone0
Interactor
burcucumbere0weed
Outcome
control of burcucumbere0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CGA 152005, primisulfuron, and the combination provided greater than 85% control of burcucumber 14 wk after planting (WAP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination controlled burcucumber by more than 85% at 14 WAP.

Treatment
CGA 152005 + primisulfurone1
Interactor
burcucumbere0weed
Outcome
control of burcucumbere0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CGA 152005, primisulfuron, and the combination provided greater than 85% control of burcucumber 14 wk after planting (WAP).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–574 · show in text ↑
e1

“CGA 152005 + primisulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumiclorac provided 60% or less control by 8 WAP.

Treatment
Flumiclorace0
Interactor
burcucumbert1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
lesse0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flumiclorac and halosulfuron provided 60% control or less by 8 WAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 37–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halosulfuron provided 60% or less control by 8 WAP.

Treatment
halosulfurone0
Interactor
burcucumbert1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
lesse0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flumiclorac and halosulfuron provided 60% control or less by 8 WAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 37–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POST timing did not influence control by 11 WAP.

Treatment
Timing of the POST applicationse0
Interactor
burcucumbere0weed
Outcome
burcucumber controle0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Timing of the POST applications did not influence burcucumber control by 11 WAP with any herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early residual control was similar across treatments.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Interactor
burcucumbert1weed
Outcome
residual controle0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments provided similar residual control early”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 37–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine residual control was below 10% by 4 WAT.

Treatment
atrazinee0
Interactor
burcucumbert1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
less thane0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
chlorimurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control from atrazine was less than 10% compared to 69% for chlorimuron and about 50% for primisulfuron and CGA 152005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 37–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorimuron residual control was 69% by 4 WAT.

Treatment
chlorimurone0
Interactor
burcucumbert1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
compared toe0
Value
69%e0
Comparator
atrazinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control from atrazine was less than 10% compared to 69% for chlorimuron and about 50% for primisulfuron and CGA 152005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 37–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primisulfuron residual control was about 50% by 4 WAT.

Treatment
primisulfurone0
Interactor
burcucumbert1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
compared toe0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
atrazinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control from atrazine was less than 10% compared to 69% for chlorimuron and about 50% for primisulfuron and CGA 152005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 37–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CGA 152005 residual control was about 50% by 4 WAT.

Treatment
CGA 152005e0
Interactor
burcucumbert1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
compared toe0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
atrazinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control from atrazine was less than 10% compared to 69% for chlorimuron and about 50% for primisulfuron and CGA 152005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–94 · show in text ↑
t1

“burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 37–67 · show in text ↑

Halosulfuron-methyl · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Primisulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

atrazine · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 69 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

herbicide · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

119 papers: 94 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

115 papers more in this group

See all 119 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.