Paper · 2012 · Phyton

Physiological changes in transgenic cotton inoculated with Trichoderma spp.

Vargas-Bejarano E; V Méndez-Trujillo; JC Vázquez Angulo; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We performed the inoculation of transgenic cotton seedlings with Trichoderma sp. strain ICA 4 to evaluate its effects on the physiological development of seedlings. Inoculated seedlings of transgenic cotton had higher development than non-inoculated seedlings. The range of values for relative growth, doubling time, height and number of leaves (0.04 g/g d; 16.88 days; 17.16 cm and 4.2, respectively) were significantly higher that those observed in non-inoculated plants (0.03 g/g day; 24.38 days; 12.33 cm and 2.6, respectively). Regarding radical architecture, inoculated seedlings with Trichoderma strain ICA 4 showed a higher percentage of roots of 2nd (46%), 3rd (73%) and 4th (98%) order with respect to control plants. This indicates that inoculation of Trichoderma strain ICA 4 can promote better nutrient use. Future studies should be designed to evaluate the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of plant hormones that could be involved in root development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased relative growth to 0.04 g/g d versus 0.03 g/g day.

Taxon
transgenic cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
inoculation of transgenic cotton seedlings with Trichoderma sp. strain ICA 4e1
Interactor
Trichoderma sp. strain ICA 4Trichoderma sp.e1symbiont
Outcome
relative growthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.04 g/g de0
Qualifier
0.03 g/g daye0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma sp.
Trichoderma sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The range of values for relative growth, doubling time, height and number of leaves (0.04 g/g d; 16.88 days; 17.16 cm and 4.2, respectively) were significantly higher that those observed in non-inoculated plants (0.03 g/g day; 24.38 days; 12.33 cm and 2.6, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“We performed the inoculation of transgenic cotton seedlings with Trichoderma sp. strain ICA 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated seedlings had higher doubling time, 16.88 versus 24.38 days as listed.

Taxon
transgenic cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
doubling timee0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.88 dayse0
Qualifier
24.38 dayse0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The range of values for relative growth, doubling time, height and number of leaves (0.04 g/g d; 16.88 days; 17.16 cm and 4.2, respectively) were significantly higher that those observed in non-inoculated plants (0.03 g/g day; 24.38 days; 12.33 cm and 2.6, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased seedling height to 17.16 cm versus 12.33 cm.

Taxon
transgenic cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.16 cme0
Qualifier
12.33 cme0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The range of values for relative growth, doubling time, height and number of leaves (0.04 g/g d; 16.88 days; 17.16 cm and 4.2, respectively) were significantly higher that those observed in non-inoculated plants (0.03 g/g day; 24.38 days; 12.33 cm and 2.6, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased leaf number to 4.2 versus 2.6.

Taxon
transgenic cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.2e0
Qualifier
2.6e0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The range of values for relative growth, doubling time, height and number of leaves (0.04 g/g d; 16.88 days; 17.16 cm and 4.2, respectively) were significantly higher that those observed in non-inoculated plants (0.03 g/g day; 24.38 days; 12.33 cm and 2.6, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–531 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased second-order root percentage by 46%.

Taxon
transgenic cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
inoculated seedlings with Trichoderma strain ICA 4e0
Interactor
Trichoderma strain ICA 4e0symbiont
Outcome
roots of 2nde0
Direction
highere0
Value
46%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated seedlings with Trichoderma strain ICA 4 showed a higher percentage of roots of 2nd (46%), 3rd (73%) and 4th (98%) order with respect to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased third-order root percentage by 73%.

Taxon
transgenic cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
inoculated seedlings with Trichoderma strain ICA 4e0
Interactor
Trichoderma strain ICA 4e0symbiont
Outcome
roots of 2nd (46%), 3rde0
Direction
highere0
Value
73%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated seedlings with Trichoderma strain ICA 4 showed a higher percentage of roots of 2nd (46%), 3rd (73%) and 4th (98%) order with respect to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased fourth-order root percentage by 98%.

Taxon
transgenic cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
inoculated seedlings with Trichoderma strain ICA 4e0
Interactor
Trichoderma strain ICA 4e0symbiont
Outcome
4the0
Direction
highere0
Value
98%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated seedlings with Trichoderma strain ICA 4 showed a higher percentage of roots of 2nd (46%), 3rd (73%) and 4th (98%) order with respect to control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that inoculation can improve nutrient use.

Taxon
transgenic cottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
inoculation of Trichoderma strain ICA 4e0
Interactor
Trichoderma strain ICA 4e0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This indicates that inoculation of Trichoderma strain ICA 4 can promote better nutrient use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“transgenic cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–42 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

transgenic · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 61 positive, 12 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.