Paper · 1970 · Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries archive of scientific and research publications (Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries)

Effect of defoliation on grade of cotton lint.

I. F. Swann; K. G. Trudgian

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of defoliation, and to some extent desiccation, on the lint quality of cotton was investigated in 4 trials in 1962-4. The 2 defoliants DEF (72% w/v S.S.S-tributyl phosphorotrithioate) and Folex (71.2% w/v.S.S.S-ttibutylphosphorotrithioite) were compared with the desiccant diquat. In all cases DEF and Folex caused loss of leaf in its green state and little desiccated leaf was present at harvest; diquat produced complete desiccation within 5 days. Little improvement in quality resulted from defoliation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation resulted in little improvement in cotton lint quality.

Treatment
defoliatione4
Outcome
improvement in qualitye4
Direction
Little improvemente4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of defoliation, and to some extent desiccation, on the lint quality of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e4

“Little improvement in quality resulted from defoliation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DEF and Folex caused loss of leaf in the green state and little desiccated leaf at harvest, compared with diquat.

Treatment
DEF and Folexe2
Outcome
loss of leaf in its green statee2
Comparator
diquate1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of defoliation, and to some extent desiccation, on the lint quality of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“were compared with the desiccant diquat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–290 · show in text ↑
e2

“In all cases DEF and Folex caused loss of leaf in its green state and little desiccated leaf was present at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diquat produced complete desiccation within 5 days.

Treatment
diquate3
Outcome
complete desiccatione3
Value
within 5 dayse3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of defoliation, and to some extent desiccation, on the lint quality of cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–88 · show in text ↑
e3

“diquat produced complete desiccation within 5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–459 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: general · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.