Paper · 2017

Optimizing biological nitrogen fixation and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) in an acidic alfisol through rhizobium inoculation, liming and fertilization.

A.A. Yusuf; Muhammed Mustapha Ibrahim; Christogonus Daudu

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was designed to identify the major factors that influence biological Nitrogen fixation and yield of groundnut in a savanna Alfisol through rhizobium inoculation, liming and fertilizer application on an acidic soil to optimize productivity. Treatments used were two levels each of lime, phosphorus, potassium and micronutrients. These were zero (0) and the recommended rates. Phosphorus was applied at 54 kg P2O5/ha, K at 25 kg K2O/ha, micronutrients (Agrolyzer) at 2 g/L and lime at 250 kg/ha. Treatments were arranged in factorial combinations and laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The groundnut seeds were inoculated with rhizobial inoculant, NC 92. A non-nodulating genotype, ICGL 5 was included for estimation of biological nitrogen fixation. This study shows that acidity which is a constraint to groundnut production can be successfully managed through liming and fertilization. Liming resulted to higher groundnut yields. Rhizobium inoculation met the N requirement of groundnut. Also, positive N balance indicated improved soil quality and can be beneficial to non-fixing crops grown in rotation. Correlation showed that the nodule and root dry weights were positively related to shoot dry matter, biological nitrogen fixation and can influence the grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Acidity constraints on groundnut production could be managed by liming and fertilization.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
liming and fertilizatione0
Outcome
managed through liming and fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acidity which is a constraint to groundnut production can be successfully managed through liming and fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased groundnut yields.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Liminge0
Outcome
groundnut yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Liming resulted to higher groundnut yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation met the groundnut nitrogen requirement.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
N requirement of groundnute0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobium inoculation met the N requirement of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1041 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Positive nitrogen balance indicated improved soil quality.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
positive N balancee0
Qualifier
improved soil qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“positive N balance indicated improved soil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1099 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The positive nitrogen balance may benefit non-fixing rotation crops.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
beneficial to non-fixing crops grown in rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“positive N balance indicated improved soil quality and can be beneficial to non-fixing crops grown in rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1159 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule and root dry weights were positively related to shoot dry matter.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage
nodule and roote0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
positively relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the nodule and root dry weights were positively related to shoot dry matter, biological nitrogen fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1290 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule and root dry weights were positively related to biological nitrogen fixation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage
nodule and roote0
Outcome
biological nitrogen fixatione0
Direction
positively relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the nodule and root dry weights were positively related to shoot dry matter, biological nitrogen fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1290 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule and root dry weights may influence grain yield.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Organ / stage
nodule and roote0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the nodule and root dry weights were positively related to shoot dry matter, biological nitrogen fixation and can influence the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1324 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

lime · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 133 positive, 9 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.