Paper · 2021 · Food Science and Technology

Effect of modified starch and gelatin by-product based edible coating on the postharvest quality and shelf life of guava fruits

Edinilda de Souza MOREIRA; Normane Mirele Chaves da SILVA; Milton Ricardo Silveira BRANDÃO; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
24
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To improve storability and to maintain the qualitative characteristics of guava fruit, by an intelligent and sustainable approach, a factorial experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications. The experimental treatments were guavas with an edible coating based on modified starch and a gelatin by-product (T1), supplemented with peppermint essential oil at three different concentrations (0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%) (T2, T3, and T4), and a control (TC) consisting of guava without coating. All treatments were stored until 15 days at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C), and characteristics were measured every 3 days. The results were analyzed by regression analysis and Tukey’s post hoc test, p ≤ 0.05). The application of a modified-starch based coating and gelatin by-product, with or without peppermint essential oil, was efficient at prolonging the shelf-life of fruit to 15 days after harvest and a little ripening related to the concentration of added peppermint oil. Considering the physicochemical aspects, the best treatment was T1 and considering the microbiological aspects, the best treatments were T3 and T4.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified starch and gelatin coating without peppermint oil prolonged guava shelf life to 15 days.

Treatment
modified-starch based coating and gelatin by-producte0
Outcome
shelf-life of fruite0
Direction
prolonginge0
Value
15 dayse0
Comparator
guava without coatinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of a modified-starch based coating and gelatin by-product, with or without peppermint essential oil, was efficient at prolonging the shelf-life of fruit to 15 days after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control (TC) consisting of guava without coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coating supplemented with peppermint essential oil prolonged guava shelf life to 15 days.

Treatment
modified-starch based coating and gelatin by-product, with or without peppermint essential oile0
Outcome
shelf-life of fruite0
Direction
prolonginge0
Value
15 dayse0
Comparator
guava without coatinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of a modified-starch based coating and gelatin by-product, with or without peppermint essential oil, was efficient at prolonging the shelf-life of fruit to 15 days after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–920 · show in text ↑
e1

“a control (TC) consisting of guava without coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–516 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava ripening varied with added peppermint oil concentration.

Treatment
peppermint oile0
Outcome
ripeninge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a little ripening related to the concentration of added peppermint oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 was the best guava treatment for physicochemical aspects.

Treatment
T1e0
Outcome
physicochemical aspectse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Considering the physicochemical aspects, the best treatment was T1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 was among the best guava treatments for microbiological aspects.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
microbiological aspectse0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“considering the microbiological aspects, the best treatments were T3 and T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–127 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 was among the best guava treatments for microbiological aspects.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
microbiological aspectse0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“considering the microbiological aspects, the best treatments were T3 and T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“guava fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–127 · show in text ↑

gelatin · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 42 positive, 4 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

botanical · quality: postharvest · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.