Paper · 2021 · Plants

The Importance of Liming with an Appropriate Liming Material: Long-Term Experience with a Typic Palexerult

Miguel Ángel Olego; Miguel Javier Quiroga; Roberto López; et al.

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aluminium phytotoxicity is considered the main limiting factor for crop productivity in agricultural acid soils. Liming is a common practice used to improve acidic soil properties, but an appropriate liming material is essential for both agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability. A long-term field experiment with two liming amendments (dolomitic limestone and limestone) was developed during 10 years to determine the changes in soil acidity and assess the effects on crop (rye) yields. Although the adverse effects of the soil acidity conditions were alleviated with both amendments tested, dolomitic limestone was the most effective in the short- and long-term period. In terms of the saturation of exchange complex, dolomitic limestone had a better efficiency, likely based on its rate of dissolution. No significant changes in soil organic matter and exchangeable potassium levels between the treatments tested were found. Both liming materials significantly increased the rye total biomass, but interestingly, significant correlations were showed between tissue levels of magnesium and biomass production, but not between the latter and calcium. The increases in rye biomass production compared with control soils at the end of the research were the following: dolomitic limestone, 47%, and limestone, 32%. A link between an increase in magnesium bioavailability and biomass production was found, as well as between magnesium rye content and total, spike and stem biomass. Hence, it could conceivably be hypothesized that since magnesium is crucial for the transport of assimilates from source leaves to sink organs, alleviating its deficiency leads to avoiding the reducing growth rate of sink organs. Although further investigations are needed to gain a better understanding of liming on the biological, chemical and physical soil properties in the long term, our research provides support for the conceptual premise that an appropriate selection of liming material is crucial for the productivity of acid soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both liming amendments alleviated adverse soil acidity.

Treatment
two liming amendments (dolomitic limestone and limestone)e1
Outcome
adverse effects of the soil acidity conditionse0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the adverse effects of the soil acidity conditions were alleviated with both amendments tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“two liming amendments (dolomitic limestone and limestone)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–389 · show in text ↑
e2

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomitic limestone was most effective in the short and long term.

Treatment
dolomitic limestonee0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dolomitic limestone was the most effective in the short- and long-term period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–688 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomitic limestone had better efficiency for exchange-complex saturation.

Treatment
dolomitic limestonee0
Outcome
saturation of exchange complexe0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
likely based on its rate of dissolutione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In terms of the saturation of exchange complex, dolomitic limestone had a better efficiency, likely based on its rate of dissolution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter did not differ significantly between liming treatments.

Treatment
treatments testede0
Outcome
soil organic mattere0
Direction
No significant changese0
Comparator
between the treatments testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant changes in soil organic matter and exchangeable potassium levels between the treatments tested were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable potassium did not differ significantly between liming treatments.

Treatment
treatments testede0
Outcome
exchangeable potassium levelse0
Direction
No significant changese0
Comparator
between the treatments testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant changes in soil organic matter and exchangeable potassium levels between the treatments tested were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both liming materials significantly increased total rye biomass.

Treatment
Both liming materialse0
Outcome
rye total biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both liming materials significantly increased the rye total biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1013 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye tissue magnesium correlated significantly with biomass production.

Compound
magnesiume0
Outcome
biomass productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant correlations were showed between tissue levels of magnesium and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1128 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium tissue levels did not correlate significantly with biomass production.

Compound
calciume0
Outcome
biomass productione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not between the latter and calcium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1168 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant correlations were showed between tissue levels of magnesium and biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1128 · show in text ↑
e2

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dolomitic limestone increased rye biomass by 47% over control soil at the end of the study.

Treatment
dolomitic limestonee0
Outcome
rye biomass productione0
Direction
increasese0
Value
47%e0
Comparator
control soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in rye biomass production compared with control soils at the end of the research were the following: dolomitic limestone, 47%, and limestone, 32%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limestone increased rye biomass by 32% over control soil at the end of the study.

Treatment
limestonee0
Outcome
rye biomass productione0
Direction
increasese0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
control soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increases in rye biomass production compared with control soils at the end of the research were the following: dolomitic limestone, 47%, and limestone, 32%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1329 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater magnesium bioavailability was linked to biomass production.

Compound
magnesiume0
Outcome
biomass productione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A link between an increase in magnesium bioavailability and biomass production was found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1419 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye magnesium content was linked to total, spike and stem biomass.

Compound
magnesiume0
Outcome
total, spike and stem biomasse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between magnesium rye content and total, spike and stem biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1495 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors hypothesize that correcting magnesium deficiency prevents reduced sink-organ growth through assimilate transport.

Compound
magnesiume0
Outcome
reducing growth rate of sink organse0
Qualifier
transport of assimilates from source leaves to sink organse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it could conceivably be hypothesized that since magnesium is crucial for the transport of assimilates from source leaves to sink organs, alleviating its deficiency leads to avoiding the reducing growth rate of sink organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1725 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that selecting an appropriate liming material is crucial for productivity of acid soils.

Outcome
appropriate selection of liming materiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an appropriate selection of liming material is crucial for the productivity of acid soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2037 · show in text ↑
e1

“crop (rye) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–504 · show in text ↑

calcium oxide · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium oxide · quality: sugar starch · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · quality: sugar starch · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · yield · Secale cereale (rye)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.