Paper · 2021

Biological Nitrogen in Increasing the Productivity of Beans (Grains)

Oleksandr Chynchyk; Svitlana Olifirovych; V. Оlifirovych; et al.

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The results of a field experiment to study the effect of seed treatment with the biological product Rhizoactive (сompany BioNorma, Ukraine) on the formation and functioning of the symbiotic apparatus of common bean (grain) plants are presented. The experiment examined six varieties of common beans (grain), included in the State Register of plant varieties suitable for distribution in Ukraine: Bukovynka, Halaktyka, Slaviia, Ros, Otrada, Nata. The influence of bacterial fertilizer based on nodule bacteria Rhizoactive on the indicators of symbiotic and grain productivity of these varieties of common beans was studied. It was found, that the maximum number and raw weight of active nodules in the studied varieties of common beans were formed in the flowering phase. A larger number of nodules, compared to the variety Bukovynka (control), was formed on the root system of bean varieties Ros, Otrada and Nata. The maximum raw weight of rhizobia in the plots without the use of Rhizoactive was formed by the common bean variety Otrada – 0.297 g/plant of active nodules. Inoculation of the seeds of the studied common bean varieties with Rhizoactive increased the raw weight of active nodules in the flowering phase by 0.016–0.042 g/plant. A larger mass of nodules, compared to the Bukovynka variety, was formed on the root system of Ros, Otrada and Nata beans. The maximum raw weight of rhizobia in areas without the use of Rhizoactive was formed by the variety of beans Otrada – 0.297 g/plant of active nodules. Inoculation of seeds of the studied varieties of beans with Rhizoactive increased the raw weight of active nodules in the flowering phase by 0.016–0.042 g/plant. The highest increase in grain yield from seed inoculation was obtained in 2018, which was more favorable in terms of moisture. Thus, the largest increase in grain yield from the use of Rhizoactive was provided by the varieties Halaktyka (0.14 t/ha or 5.7 %), Ros (0.15 t/ha or 5.5 %) and Otrada (0.22 t/ha or 7.7 %). On average, in 2018–2020, inoculation of bean seeds with Rhizoactive, depending on the variety, provided an increase in grain yield from 2.4 to 6.7 %. And the highest level of bean grain yield on average in 2018–2020 was provided by the varieties Otrada (2.60 t/ha), Nata (2.50 t/ha) and Ros (2.40 t/ha) for inoculation of seeds with Rhizoactive

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Active nodules reached their maximum number and raw weight at flowering.

Taxon
common beansPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
flowering phasee0
Outcome
maximum number and raw weight of active nodulese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum number and raw weight of active nodules in the studied varieties of common beans were formed in the flowering phase.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–770 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ros, Otrada and Nata had more nodules than Bukovynka.

Taxon
beane0
Material
Ros, Otrada and Natae0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
Bukovynkae0

Verbatim

e0

“A larger number of nodules, compared to the variety Bukovynka (control), was formed on the root system of bean varieties Ros, Otrada and Nata.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–913 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without Rhizoactive, Otrada had the maximum active nodule raw weight of 0.297 g/plant.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Material
Otradae0
Outcome
maximum raw weight of rhizobiae0
Value
0.297 g/plante0
Qualifier
without the use of Rhizoactivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum raw weight of rhizobia in the plots without the use of Rhizoactive was formed by the common bean variety Otrada – 0.297 g/plant of active nodules.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoactive inoculation increased active nodule raw weight by 0.016–0.042 g/plant at flowering.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Organ / stage
flowering phasee0
Treatment
Inoculation of the seeds of the studied common bean varieties with Rhizoactivee0
Outcome
raw weight of active nodulese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.016–0.042 g/plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of the seeds of the studied common bean varieties with Rhizoactive increased the raw weight of active nodules in the flowering phase by 0.016–0.042 g/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1241 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ros, Otrada and Nata had a larger nodule mass than Bukovynka.

Taxon
beanse0
Material
Ros, Otrada and Natae0
Outcome
mass of nodulese0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
Bukovynkae0

Verbatim

e0

“A larger mass of nodules, compared to the Bukovynka variety, was formed on the root system of Ros, Otrada and Nata beans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1363 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest yield increase from seed inoculation occurred in the wetter year 2018.

Taxon
beanst0
Outcome
increase in grain yielde0
Direction
highest increasee0
Setting
2018e0

Verbatim

e0

“The highest increase in grain yield from seed inoculation was obtained in 2018, which was more favorable in terms of moisture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1804 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoactive raised Halaktyka grain yield by 0.14 t/ha or 5.7 %.

Taxon
Beanst0
Material
Halaktykae0
Treatment
Rhizoactivee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.14 t/ha or 5.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, the largest increase in grain yield from the use of Rhizoactive was provided by the varieties Halaktyka (0.14 t/ha or 5.7 %), Ros (0.15 t/ha or 5.5 %) and Otrada (0.22 t/ha or 7.7 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoactive raised Ros grain yield by 0.15 t/ha or 5.5 %.

Taxon
Beanst0
Material
Rose0
Treatment
Rhizoactivee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.15 t/ha or 5.5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, the largest increase in grain yield from the use of Rhizoactive was provided by the varieties Halaktyka (0.14 t/ha or 5.7 %), Ros (0.15 t/ha or 5.5 %) and Otrada (0.22 t/ha or 7.7 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizoactive raised Otrada grain yield by 0.22 t/ha or 7.7 %.

Taxon
Beanst0
Material
Otradae0
Treatment
Rhizoactivee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.22 t/ha or 7.7 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, the largest increase in grain yield from the use of Rhizoactive was provided by the varieties Halaktyka (0.14 t/ha or 5.7 %), Ros (0.15 t/ha or 5.5 %) and Otrada (0.22 t/ha or 7.7 %).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1994 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across 2018–2020, Rhizoactive inoculation increased bean grain yield by 2.4 to 6.7 %, depending on variety.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
inoculation of bean seeds with Rhizoactivee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.4 to 6.7 %e0
Qualifier
depending on the varietye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“On average, in 2018–2020, inoculation of bean seeds with Rhizoactive, depending on the variety, provided an increase in grain yield from 2.4 to 6.7 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1995–2145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Otrada produced an average grain yield of 2.60 t/ha during 2018–2020.

Taxon
beant0
Material
Otradae0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Value
2.60 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Otrada (2.60 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2242–2260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“And the highest level of bean grain yield on average in 2018–2020 was provided by the varieties Otrada (2.60 t/ha), Nata (2.50 t/ha) and Ros (2.40 t/ha) for inoculation of seeds with Rhizoactive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Nata produced an average grain yield of 2.50 t/ha during 2018–2020.

Taxon
beant0
Material
Natae0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Value
2.50 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Nata (2.50 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2262–2278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“And the highest level of bean grain yield on average in 2018–2020 was provided by the varieties Otrada (2.60 t/ha), Nata (2.50 t/ha) and Ros (2.40 t/ha) for inoculation of seeds with Rhizoactive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated Ros produced an average grain yield of 2.40 t/ha during 2018–2020.

Taxon
beant0
Material
Rose0
Outcome
grain yielde1
Value
2.40 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Ros (2.40 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2283–2298 · show in text ↑
t0

“Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“And the highest level of bean grain yield on average in 2018–2020 was provided by the varieties Otrada (2.60 t/ha), Nata (2.50 t/ha) and Ros (2.40 t/ha) for inoculation of seeds with Rhizoactive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2146–2340 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.