Paper · 2006 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

EFFECT OF NITROGEN SOURCES AND THEIR MIXTURES ON YELD, SOME CHARACTERS AND IWNERAL COMPOSITION OF SOME FLAX GENOTYPES (Linum usflafisshnun1L)

M.R. Mohamed; EA. Moawed

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at the farm of Tag EL-EZZ Res station, Dakahlia Governorate, during winter seasons of 2002/2003 and 2003/2004 The work aimed to study the effect of three nitrogen sources and their mixtures yield, some seed characters and mineral concentrations in some flax genotypes (Sakha 1 & Sakha 2 varieties and strains of 2419/1 & 413/1/3/2). The nitrogen sources were used are: urea (46% N), ammonium nitrate (33% N) and ammonium sulphate (20.5% N) with the recommended dose (45 kg N fed‘1). The obtained results can be summarized in the following: 1- The data showed that, there were highly significant differences between flax genotypes for the studied parameters in both seasons. 2- Sakha 1 variety surpassed Sakha 2 and the strains of 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2 plant height, technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/fed. and fiber yield in both seasons. 3- Sakha 2 surpassed Sakha 1, 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2 for seed index and seed yield/fed. in both seasons, as well as macro and micronutrients concentration while strain 2419/1 surpassed other strains and species for No. capsule and seed yield/plant in both seasons. 4- Using ammonium nitrate + ammonium sulphate significantly increased all studied parameters as yield and seed characters, as well as macro and micronutrients concentration in both studied seasons. 5- It is noticed that, the interactions effect between all treatments on all studied parameters were heighly significant in both seasons, of present work.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flax genotypes differed significantly across studied parameters in both seasons.

Material
flax genotypese0
Outcome
studied parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highly significant differences between flax genotypes for the studied parameters in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–706 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 exceeded other genotypes in plant height and technical length in both seasons.

Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
plant height, technical lengthe0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Sakha 2 and the strains of 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 1 variety surpassed Sakha 2 and the strains of 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2 plant height, technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/fed. and fiber yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–883 · show in text ↑
e1

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–663 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 1 exceeded other genotypes in straw yield per plant, straw yield per feddan and fiber yield.

Material
Sakha 1e0
Outcome
straw yield/plant, straw yield/fed. and fiber yielde0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Sakha 2 and the strains of 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 1 variety surpassed Sakha 2 and the strains of 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2 plant height, technical length, straw yield/plant, straw yield/fed. and fiber yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–883 · show in text ↑
e1

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–663 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 2 exceeded comparison genotypes in seed index and seed yield per feddan.

Material
Sakha 2e0
Outcome
seed index and seed yield/fed.e0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Sakha 1, 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 2 surpassed Sakha 1, 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2 for seed index and seed yield/fed. in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–663 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sakha 2 exceeded comparison genotypes in macro and micronutrient concentration.

Material
Sakha 2e0
Outcome
macro and micronutrients concentratione0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
Sakha 1, 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sakha 2 surpassed Sakha 1, 2419/1 and 413/1/3/2 for seed index and seed yield/fed. in both seasons, as well as macro and micronutrients concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–663 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain 2419/1 exceeded other strains in capsule number and seed yield per plant.

Material
strain 2419/1e0
Outcome
No. capsule and seed yield/plante0
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
other strains and speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain 2419/1 surpassed other strains and species for No. capsule and seed yield/plant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate plus ammonium sulphate increased flax yield and seed characters.

Treatment
ammonium nitrate + ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
yield and seed characterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using ammonium nitrate + ammonium sulphate significantly increased all studied parameters as yield and seed characters, as well as macro and micronutrients concentration in both studied seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate plus ammonium sulphate increased macro and micronutrient concentrations.

Treatment
ammonium nitrate + ammonium sulphatee0
Outcome
macro and micronutrients concentratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using ammonium nitrate + ammonium sulphate significantly increased all studied parameters as yield and seed characters, as well as macro and micronutrients concentration in both studied seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–663 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactions among treatments significantly affected all studied parameters in both seasons.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
all studied parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linum usitatissimum
Linum usitatissimum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the interactions effect between all treatments on all studied parameters were heighly significant in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1480 · show in text ↑
e1

“flax genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–663 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ammonium sulfate · yield · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · Linum usitatissimum (flax)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.