Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Summer Pruning, an Eco-Friendly Approach to Controlling Bitter Pit and Preserving Sensory Quality in Highly Vigorous Apple cv. ‘Reinette du Canada’

Marcos Guerra; Miguel Ángel Sanz; Álvaro Rodríguez-González; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summer pruning reduces vegetative growth in apple trees, but it could have an impact on fruit quality. This study analyzed the effects of summer pruning as an eco-friendly pre-harvest alternative to chemical growth regulation inputs on instrumental and sensory quality of highly vigorous apple cv. ‘Reinette du Canada’, which has been awarded with a Protected Designation of Origin label in two environments. The results showed that summer pruning affected the mineral content of the fruit. Summer pruning reduced bitter pit, but it did not negatively affect fruit weight nor any other instrumental characteristic during storage. Moreover, sensory quality or degree of liking were not affected by summer pruning. Thus, summer pruning could be an eco-friendly pre-harvest alternative to chemical treatments to improve quality in global terms of ‘Reinette du Canada’ apple cultivar, regardless of the location. This technique contributed to the decrease of bitter pit incidence, but did not decrease sensory quality nor degree of liking.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning affected fruit mineral content.

Treatment
summer pruninge0
Outcome
mineral content of the fruite0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that summer pruning affected the mineral content of the fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning reduced bitter pit.

Treatment
Summer pruninge0
Outcome
bitter pite0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Summer pruning reduced bitter pit, but it did not negatively affect fruit weight nor any other instrumental characteristic during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning did not negatively affect fruit weight or other instrumental storage characteristics.

Treatment
Summer pruninge0
Outcome
fruit weight nor any other instrumental characteristic during storagee0
Direction
did not negatively affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Summer pruning reduced bitter pit, but it did not negatively affect fruit weight nor any other instrumental characteristic during storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer pruning did not affect sensory quality or degree of liking.

Treatment
summer pruninge0
Outcome
sensory quality or degree of likinge0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moreover, sensory quality or degree of liking were not affected by summer pruning.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose summer pruning as an alternative to chemical treatments for overall apple quality.

Outcome
summer pruning could be an eco-friendly pre-harvest alternative to chemical treatmentse0
Qualifier
regardless of the locatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“summer pruning could be an eco-friendly pre-harvest alternative to chemical treatments to improve quality in global terms of ‘Reinette du Canada’ apple cultivar, regardless of the location.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–122 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: general · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

pruning · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 100 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.