Paper · 2021 · Plants

Epiphytic PGPB Bacillus megaterium AFI1 and Paenibacillus nicotianae AFI2 Improve Wheat Growth and Antioxidant Status under Ni Stress

Veronika N. Pishchik; Polina S. Filippova; Galina V. Mirskaya; et al.

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present study demonstrates the Ni toxicity-ameliorating and growth-promoting abilities of two different bacterial isolates when applied to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as the host plant. Two bacterial strains tolerant to Ni stress were isolated from wheat seeds and selected based on their ability to improve the germination of wheat plants; they were identified as Bacillus megaterium AFI1 and Paenibacillus nicotianae AFI2. The protective effects of these epiphytic bacteria against Ni stress were studied in model experiments with two wheat cultivars: Ni stress-tolerant Leningradskaya 6 and susceptible Chinese spring. When these isolates were used as the inoculants applied to Ni-treated wheat plants, the growth parameters and the levels of photosynthetic pigments of the two wheat cultivars both under normal and Ni-stress conditions were increased, though B. megaterium AFI1 had a more pronounced ameliorative effect on the Ni contents in plant tissues due to its synthesis of siderophores. Over the 10 days of Ni exposure, the plant growth promotion bacteria (PGPB) significantly reduced the lipid peroxidation (LPO), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities and proline content in the leaves of both wheat cultivars. The PGPB also increased peroxidase (POX) activity and the levels of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids in the wheat leaves. It was concluded that B. megaterium AFI1 is an ideal candidate for bioremediation and wheat growth promotion against Ni-induced oxidative stress, as it increases photosynthetic pigment contents, induces the antioxidant defense system, and lowers Ni metal uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculants applied to Ni-treated wheat increased growth parameters and photosynthetic pigment levels under normal and Ni-stress conditions.

Treatment
inoculants applied to Ni-treated wheat plantse2
Interactor
these isolatese2symbiont
Outcome
growth parameters and the levels of photosynthetic pigmentse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
both under normal and Ni-stress conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“When these isolates were used as the inoculants applied to Ni-treated wheat plants, the growth parameters and the levels of photosynthetic pigments of the two wheat cultivars both under normal and Ni-stress conditions were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“applied to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as the host plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus megaterium AFI1 had a stronger effect than the other isolate in lowering Ni contents in wheat tissues, through siderophore synthesis.

Organ / stage
plant tissuese3
Treatment
B. megaterium AFI1e3
Interactor
B. megaterium AFI1Priestia megateriume3symbiont
Outcome
Ni contentse3
Direction
more pronouncede3
Qualifier
due to its synthesis of siderophorese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“though B. megaterium AFI1 had a more pronounced ameliorative effect on the Ni contents in plant tissues due to its synthesis of siderophores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“applied to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as the host plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–189 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB significantly reduced lipid peroxidation, ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in wheat leaves during Ni exposure.

Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
plant growth promotion bacteria (PGPB)e4
Interactor
PGPBe4symbiont
Outcome
lipid peroxidation (LPO), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitiese4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
Over the 10 days of Ni exposuree4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Over the 10 days of Ni exposure, the plant growth promotion bacteria (PGPB) significantly reduced the lipid peroxidation (LPO), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities and proline content in the leaves of both wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB significantly reduced proline content in wheat leaves during Ni exposure.

Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
plant growth promotion bacteria (PGPB)e4
Interactor
PGPBe4symbiont
Outcome
proline contente4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
Over the 10 days of Ni exposuree4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Over the 10 days of Ni exposure, the plant growth promotion bacteria (PGPB) significantly reduced the lipid peroxidation (LPO), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities and proline content in the leaves of both wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB increased peroxidase activity in wheat leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese5
Treatment
PGPBe5
Interactor
PGPBe5symbiont
Outcome
peroxidase (POX) activitye5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The PGPB also increased peroxidase (POX) activity and the levels of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids in the wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB increased chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid levels in wheat leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese5
Treatment
PGPBe5
Interactor
PGPBe5symbiont
Outcome
levels of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoidse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The PGPB also increased peroxidase (POX) activity and the levels of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids in the wheat leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1389 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus megaterium AFI1 is an ideal candidate for bioremediation and wheat growth promotion under Ni-induced oxidative stress.

Interactor
B. megaterium AFI1Priestia megateriume6symbiont
Outcome
ideal candidate for bioremediation and wheat growth promotione6
Qualifier
against Ni-induced oxidative stresse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Priestia megaterium
Priestia megaterium · InteractorOsmoregulator / Osmoregulator at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“B. megaterium AFI1 is an ideal candidate for bioremediation and wheat growth promotion against Ni-induced oxidative stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1535 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Priestia megaterium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 34 positive, 8 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 76 positive, 6 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

42 papers: 42 positive, 0 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.