Paper · 2021 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Early performance of several Prunus interspecific hybrid rootstocks for Redhaven peach in southern Ontario

J.A. Cline; C.J. Bakker

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A multi-year orchard experiment was established to measure the performance of Rootpac ® -R, Rootpac ® -20, Rootpac ® -40, and Rootpac ® -70 rootstocks using ‘Redhaven’ peach (Prunus persica var. persica) as the scion, compared with the ‘Bailey’ peach seedling rootstock, the current industry standard. Tree survival after five years was 79% on Rootpac-40, whereas the remaining rootstocks showed no tree mortality. Tree vigour and canopy height and width were influenced by rootstock genotype beginning the year of planting in 2016. For the first five years of production, Rootpac-70 consistently produced the largest trees based on truck cross-sectional area (TCSA) and by year five, all rootstocks produced trees with similar TCSAs, except for Rootpac-70, which was 38% larger than Bailey. By year five, cumulative yields were greatest on Rootpac-70, which were 10% higher than Bailey; cumulative yields of Rootpac-R, Rootpac-20, and Rootpac-30 were 98%, 89%, and 84% that of Bailey, respectively. Cumulative yield efficiency was significantly influenced by rootstock although the magnitude of the differences was small and likely of insignificant commercial importance. Rootpac-40 consistently produced the largest fruit. These results are only reflective of the orchard establishment years and additional data are required before peach producers can make fully informed decisions concerning the rootstocks evaluated in this study for their orchard systems. However, at this juncture, all the Rootpac rootstocks evaluated in this study are likely to impart excessive vigour to be used in a higher density system and offer little advantage over Bailey.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree survival after five years was 79% on Rootpac-40 rootstock.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Material
Rootpac-40e1
Outcome
Tree survivale1
Value
79%e1
Qualifier
after five yearse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tree survival after five years was 79% on Rootpac-40”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining rootstocks showed no tree mortality.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Material
remaining rootstockse2
Outcome
tree mortalitye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas the remaining rootstocks showed no tree mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–413 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstock genotype influenced tree vigour and canopy height and width from the year of planting in 2016.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
rootstock genotypee3
Outcome
Tree vigour and canopy height and widthe3
Qualifier
beginning the year of planting in 2016e3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e3

“Tree vigour and canopy height and width were influenced by rootstock genotype beginning the year of planting in 2016”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–531 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootpac-70 consistently produced the largest trees by truck cross-sectional area in the first five years of production.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Material
Rootpac-70e4
Outcome
truck cross-sectional area (TCSA)e4
Direction
largeste4
Qualifier
For the first five years of productione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e4

“For the first five years of production, Rootpac-70 consistently produced the largest trees based on truck cross-sectional area (TCSA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By year five, Rootpac-70 trees were 38% larger in truck cross-sectional area than Bailey.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
Rootpac-70e6
Outcome
TCSAse5
Direction
largere6
Value
38%e6
Comparator
Baileye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e5

“by year five, all rootstocks produced trees with similar TCSAs, except for Rootpac-70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–756 · show in text ↑
e6

“Rootpac-70, which was 38% larger than Bailey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–790 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

By year five, all rootstocks except Rootpac-70 produced trees with similar truck cross-sectional area.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Material
all rootstockse5
Outcome
TCSAse5
Direction
similare5
Qualifier
except for Rootpac-70e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e5

“by year five, all rootstocks produced trees with similar TCSAs, except for Rootpac-70”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative yield on Rootpac-70 was 10% higher than Bailey by year five.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
Rootpac-70e7
Outcome
cumulative yieldse7
Direction
highere7
Value
10%e7
Comparator
Baileye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e7

“By year five, cumulative yields were greatest on Rootpac-70, which were 10% higher than Bailey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative yield of Rootpac-R was 98% that of Bailey.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
Rootpac-Re1
Outcome
cumulative yieldse1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
98%e1
Comparator
Baileye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“cumulative yields of Rootpac-R, Rootpac-20, and Rootpac-30 were 98%, 89%, and 84% that of Bailey, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative yield of Rootpac-20 was 89% that of Bailey.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
Rootpac-20e1
Outcome
cumulative yieldse1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
89%e1
Comparator
Baileye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“cumulative yields of Rootpac-R, Rootpac-20, and Rootpac-30 were 98%, 89%, and 84% that of Bailey, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative yield of Rootpac-30 was 84% that of Bailey.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
Rootpac-30e1
Outcome
cumulative yieldse1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
84%e1
Comparator
Baileye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“cumulative yields of Rootpac-R, Rootpac-20, and Rootpac-30 were 98%, 89%, and 84% that of Bailey, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–998 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cumulative yield efficiency was significantly influenced by rootstock, with small differences.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Treatment
rootstocke1
Outcome
Cumulative yield efficiencye1
Qualifier
the magnitude of the differences was smalle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cumulative yield efficiency was significantly influenced by rootstock although the magnitude of the differences was small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootpac-40 consistently produced the largest fruit.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Material
Rootpac-40e1
Outcome
fruite1
Direction
largeste1
Qualifier
consistentlye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rootpac-40 consistently produced the largest fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1223 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the Rootpac rootstocks are likely to impart excessive vigour in a higher density system and offer little advantage over Bailey.

Taxon
Prunus persicaPrunus persicae0
Outcome
offer little advantage over Baileye1
Qualifier
excessive vigoure1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunus persica var. persica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–202 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the Rootpac rootstocks evaluated in this study are likely to impart excessive vigour to be used in a higher density system and offer little advantage over Bailey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1653 · show in text ↑