Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Growth, Yield, Quality, and Phytochemical Behavior of Three Cultivars of Quinoa in Response to Moringa and Azolla Extracts under Organic Farming Conditions

Rasha S. El-Serafy; Abdel-Nasser A. El-Sheshtawy; Usama A. Abd El-Razek; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Increased demand for quinoa as a functional food has resulted in more quinoa-growing areas and initiatives to increase grain production, particularly in organic agriculture. Quinoa seeds are a superfood with incredible nutritional benefits. They are abundant in secondary metabolites with significant medicinal activity. This report was consequently performed to investigate whether Azolla fliculoides (AE) or moringa leaf extract (MLE) foliar spray can be supplemented as organic extracts to enhance quinoa growth and productivity under organic farming. Three quinoa cultivars, KVL–SRA2 (C1), Chipaya (C2), and Q–37 (C3), were grown organically and subjected to foliar spraying with AE or MLE at a 20% ratio, as well as their combination (AE+MLE). Plant performance of the three cultivars was significantly enhanced by MLE or AE applications as compared with control plants. The highest outputs were obtained by AE+MLE treatment, which significantly increased the seed yield by about 29% as compared with untreated plants. Seed quality exhibited a marked increase in response to AE+MLE that was superior in this regard as it showed higher protein, carbohydrates, saponine, tannins, phenolics, and flavonoids content. The C3-cultivar demonstrated the highest productivity, saponine, and flavonoids levels as compared to the other cultivars. Overall, the current study indicated that foliar spray with AE+MLE could enhance growth and productivity as well as quality and pharmaceutical active ingredients of quinoa cultivars grown under farming conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moringa leaf extract enhanced quinoa plant performance relative to controls.

Treatment
MLEe1
Outcome
Plant performancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant performance of the three cultivars was significantly enhanced by MLE or AE applications as compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“moringa leaf extract (MLE) foliar spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azolla extract enhanced quinoa plant performance relative to controls.

Treatment
AEe1
Outcome
Plant performancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant performance of the three cultivars was significantly enhanced by MLE or AE applications as compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–875 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azolla fliculoides (AE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–406 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Azolla and moringa extracts raised quinoa seed yield by about 29% over untreated plants.

Treatment
AE+MLE treatmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 29%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AE+MLE treatment, which significantly increased the seed yield by about 29% as compared with untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined extracts increased quinoa seed protein, carbohydrates and saponine.

Treatment
AE+MLEe0
Outcome
protein, carbohydrates, saponinee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed quality exhibited a marked increase in response to AE+MLE that was superior in this regard as it showed higher protein, carbohydrates, saponine, tannins, phenolics, and flavonoids content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined extracts increased quinoa seed tannins, phenolics and flavonoids.

Treatment
AE+MLEe0
Outcome
tannins, phenolics, and flavonoids contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed quality exhibited a marked increase in response to AE+MLE that was superior in this regard as it showed higher protein, carbohydrates, saponine, tannins, phenolics, and flavonoids content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Q–37 had the highest productivity among the three cultivars.

Material
Q–37e1
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The C3-cultivar demonstrated the highest productivity, saponine, and flavonoids levels as compared to the other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“Q–37 (C3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Q–37 had the highest saponine and flavonoid levels among the cultivars.

Material
Q–37e1
Outcome
saponine, and flavonoids levelse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
the other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The C3-cultivar demonstrated the highest productivity, saponine, and flavonoids levels as compared to the other cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“Q–37 (C3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–79 · show in text ↑

botanical · quality: phytochemicals · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · quality: protein · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · yield · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.