Abstract
Abstract Chemicals used for seed treatments help to increase the agricultural production by preventing pests and pathogens but also cause environmental and health problems. Thus, environmentally-friendly technologies need to be developed for a seed treatment that inactivates surface microflora and improves seed vigor. One such pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment applied to cucumber seeds in the range of 1.07-17.28 Joule (J) significantly enhanced a mean germination rate (MGR) by up to 9%, a normal seedling rate by 25.73%, and a resistance to 100 and 200 mM salt stresses by 96% and 91.67%, respectively, with a stronger and faster growth of roots and seedlings. PEF treatment provided 3.34 and 3.22 log-reductions in the surface microflora of total mold and yeast and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, respectively. The electrical conductivity (EC) values of the control samples increased over time, from 4 to 24 h. Those of the PEF-treated samples after 4, 12, and 24 th hours were also more affected by the measurement time not by the PEF treatment. The joint optimization of 18 responses based on the best-fit Gaussian process model pointed to 19.78 s and 17.28 J as the optimal settings. The PEF treatment appeared to improve seed germination ability and stress resistance with the adequate inactivation of surface microflora.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
PEF treatment increased mean germination rate of cucumber seeds by up to 9%.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- pulsed electric field (PEF) treatmente1
- Outcome
- mean germination rate (MGR)e1
- Direction
- enhancede1
- Value
- up to 9%e1
- Qualifier
- 1.07-17.28 Joule (J)e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e1“One such pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment applied to cucumber seeds in the range of 1.07-17.28 Joule (J) significantly enhanced a mean germination rate (MGR) by up to 9%”
Claim · model-written summary
PEF treatment increased normal seedling rate of cucumber seeds by 25.73%.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- pulsed electric field (PEF) treatmente1
- Outcome
- normal seedling ratee1
- Direction
- enhancede1
- Value
- 25.73%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e1“One such pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment applied to cucumber seeds in the range of 1.07-17.28 Joule (J) significantly enhanced a mean germination rate (MGR) by up to 9%, a normal seedling rate by 25.73%”
Claim · model-written summary
PEF treatment increased resistance of cucumber seedlings to 100 mM salt stress by 96%.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- pulsed electric fields (PEF)t0
- Outcome
- resistancee1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 96%e1
- Qualifier
- 100 and 200 mM salt stressese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e1“and a resistance to 100 and 200 mM salt stresses by 96% and 91.67%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
PEF treatment increased resistance of cucumber seedlings to 200 mM salt stress by 91.67%.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- pulsed electric fields (PEF)t0
- Outcome
- resistancee1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 91.67%e1
- Qualifier
- 100 and 200 mM salt stressese1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e1“and a resistance to 100 and 200 mM salt stresses by 96% and 91.67%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
PEF treatment gave stronger and faster growth of cucumber roots and seedlings.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- pulsed electric fields (PEF)t0
- Outcome
- growth of roots and seedlingse1
- Direction
- stronger and fastere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e1“with a stronger and faster growth of roots and seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
PEF treatment gave 3.34 log-reductions of total mold and yeast on cucumber seed surfaces.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- PEF treatmente2
- Interactor
- surface microflorae2other
- Outcome
- surface microflora of total mold and yeaste2
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede2
- Value
- 3.34e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e2“PEF treatment provided 3.34 and 3.22 log-reductions in the surface microflora of total mold and yeast and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
PEF treatment gave 3.22 log-reductions of total aerobic mesophilic bacteria on cucumber seed surfaces.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- PEF treatmente2
- Interactor
- surface microflorae2other
- Outcome
- total aerobic mesophilic bacteriae2
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede2
- Value
- 3.22e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e2“PEF treatment provided 3.34 and 3.22 log-reductions in the surface microflora of total mold and yeast and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Electrical conductivity of control cucumber seed samples increased from 4 to 24 h.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- electrical conductivity (EC) values of the control samplese3
- Direction
- increasede3
- Qualifier
- from 4 to 24 he3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e3“The electrical conductivity (EC) values of the control samples increased over time, from 4 to 24 h”
Claim · model-written summary
Electrical conductivity of PEF-treated cucumber seed samples was more affected by measurement time than by PEF treatment.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Treatment
- PEF treatmente4
- Outcome
- affected by the measurement timee4
- Direction
- more affectede4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e4“Those of the PEF-treated samples after 4, 12, and 24 th hours were also more affected by the measurement time not by the PEF treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Joint optimization of 18 responses gave 19.78 s and 17.28 J as optimal PEF settings for cucumber seeds.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativust0
- Outcome
- optimal settingse5
- Value
- 19.78 s and 17.28 Je5
- Qualifier
- joint optimization of 18 responses based on the best-fit Gaussian process modele5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”
e5“The joint optimization of 18 responses based on the best-fit Gaussian process model pointed to 19.78 s and 17.28 J as the optimal settings”
The same questions in other papers
physical treatment · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.