Paper · 2021 · The EuroBiotech Journal

Unrevealing the impact of pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour and surface disinfection

Bahar Atmaca; Gulsun Akdemir Evrendilek; Nurullah Bulut; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
12
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Chemicals used for seed treatments help to increase the agricultural production by preventing pests and pathogens but also cause environmental and health problems. Thus, environmentally-friendly technologies need to be developed for a seed treatment that inactivates surface microflora and improves seed vigor. One such pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment applied to cucumber seeds in the range of 1.07-17.28 Joule (J) significantly enhanced a mean germination rate (MGR) by up to 9%, a normal seedling rate by 25.73%, and a resistance to 100 and 200 mM salt stresses by 96% and 91.67%, respectively, with a stronger and faster growth of roots and seedlings. PEF treatment provided 3.34 and 3.22 log-reductions in the surface microflora of total mold and yeast and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, respectively. The electrical conductivity (EC) values of the control samples increased over time, from 4 to 24 h. Those of the PEF-treated samples after 4, 12, and 24 th hours were also more affected by the measurement time not by the PEF treatment. The joint optimization of 18 responses based on the best-fit Gaussian process model pointed to 19.78 s and 17.28 J as the optimal settings. The PEF treatment appeared to improve seed germination ability and stress resistance with the adequate inactivation of surface microflora.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEF treatment increased mean germination rate of cucumber seeds by up to 9%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pulsed electric field (PEF) treatmente1
Outcome
mean germination rate (MGR)e1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
up to 9%e1
Qualifier
1.07-17.28 Joule (J)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“One such pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment applied to cucumber seeds in the range of 1.07-17.28 Joule (J) significantly enhanced a mean germination rate (MGR) by up to 9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEF treatment increased normal seedling rate of cucumber seeds by 25.73%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pulsed electric field (PEF) treatmente1
Outcome
normal seedling ratee1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
25.73%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“One such pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment applied to cucumber seeds in the range of 1.07-17.28 Joule (J) significantly enhanced a mean germination rate (MGR) by up to 9%, a normal seedling rate by 25.73%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEF treatment increased resistance of cucumber seedlings to 100 mM salt stress by 96%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pulsed electric fields (PEF)t0
Outcome
resistancee1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
96%e1
Qualifier
100 and 200 mM salt stressese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“and a resistance to 100 and 200 mM salt stresses by 96% and 91.67%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEF treatment increased resistance of cucumber seedlings to 200 mM salt stress by 91.67%.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pulsed electric fields (PEF)t0
Outcome
resistancee1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
91.67%e1
Qualifier
100 and 200 mM salt stressese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“and a resistance to 100 and 200 mM salt stresses by 96% and 91.67%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEF treatment gave stronger and faster growth of cucumber roots and seedlings.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
pulsed electric fields (PEF)t0
Outcome
growth of roots and seedlingse1
Direction
stronger and fastere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e1

“with a stronger and faster growth of roots and seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEF treatment gave 3.34 log-reductions of total mold and yeast on cucumber seed surfaces.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
PEF treatmente2
Interactor
surface microflorae2other
Outcome
surface microflora of total mold and yeaste2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
3.34e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“PEF treatment provided 3.34 and 3.22 log-reductions in the surface microflora of total mold and yeast and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–823 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PEF treatment gave 3.22 log-reductions of total aerobic mesophilic bacteria on cucumber seed surfaces.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
PEF treatmente2
Interactor
surface microflorae2other
Outcome
total aerobic mesophilic bacteriae2
Direction
decreaseinferrede2
Value
3.22e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e2

“PEF treatment provided 3.34 and 3.22 log-reductions in the surface microflora of total mold and yeast and total aerobic mesophilic bacteria, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–823 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrical conductivity of control cucumber seed samples increased from 4 to 24 h.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
electrical conductivity (EC) values of the control samplese3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
from 4 to 24 he3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“The electrical conductivity (EC) values of the control samples increased over time, from 4 to 24 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–923 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Electrical conductivity of PEF-treated cucumber seed samples was more affected by measurement time than by PEF treatment.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
PEF treatmente4
Outcome
affected by the measurement timee4
Direction
more affectede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“Those of the PEF-treated samples after 4, 12, and 24 th hours were also more affected by the measurement time not by the PEF treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1059 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Joint optimization of 18 responses gave 19.78 s and 17.28 J as optimal PEF settings for cucumber seeds.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Outcome
optimal settingse5
Value
19.78 s and 17.28 Je5
Qualifier
joint optimization of 18 responses based on the best-fit Gaussian process modele5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“pulsed electric fields (PEF) on cucumber seed vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–78 · show in text ↑
e5

“The joint optimization of 18 responses based on the best-fit Gaussian process model pointed to 19.78 s and 17.28 J as the optimal settings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1199 · show in text ↑

physical treatment · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.