Paper · 2007 · Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology

EFFECT OF VARIOUS TYPES OF BACTERIAL INOCULATION ALONG WITH A STARTER DOSE OF N ON GROWTH, YIELD AND YIELD COMPONETS OF CANOLA

H.H. Abotaleb; H M. E. Taher; A. A. Ragab; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Canola is a newly introduced oil crop into the Egyptian agriculture, it is absolutely necessary to conduct research work in order to maximize its both productivity and reduce costs. During both seasons (2003/04 and 2004/05) a field experiment was carried out in the Experimental farm of the Agricultural Research Center (ARC) at Giza to evaluate the response of three canola varieties namely Sero4, Pactol and AD204 to inoculation with four types of bacteria (Rhizobia, diazotrophs, Bacillus and a mixture of them). Nitrogen was applied at 15 as starter dose and 50 kg N fed-1 without inocl. (recommended) in two equal spilt doses applied at 21 and 35 days after planting. Results of 140 day old plants indicate that inoculation in general, had a positive effect on seed quality (% germination, shoot and radical length, seedling weight and electrical conductivity). Yield and yield components of inoculated canola plants receiving 15 kg N fed-1 were higher as compared to uninoculated canola plants with full N-fertilizer dose (50 kg N fed-1). Inoculated plants produced seeds with higher oil content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation improved canola seed germination and seedling growth measures.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
% germination, shoot and radical length, seedling weighte0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation in general, had a positive effect on seed quality (% germination, shoot and radical length, seedling weight and electrical conductivity).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation positively affected canola seed electrical conductivity.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
electrical conductivitye0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation in general, had a positive effect on seed quality (% germination, shoot and radical length, seedling weight and electrical conductivity).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated canola receiving 15 kg N fed-1 had higher yield and yield components than uninoculated canola receiving 50 kg N fed-1.

Treatment
inoculated canola plants receiving 15 kg N fed-1e0
Outcome
Yield and yield componentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
uninoculated canola plants with full N-fertilizer dose (50 kg N fed-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield and yield components of inoculated canola plants receiving 15 kg N fed-1 were higher as compared to uninoculated canola plants with full N-fertilizer dose (50 kg N fed-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated canola produced seeds with higher oil content.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants produced seeds with higher oil content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“CANOLA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 120–126 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus var. napus · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.