Paper · 2019 · Agropedology

Influence of Zinc Fortification on Yields and Quality of Fodder Maize

M. Shanti; R. Susheela; V. Chandrika; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of fortification of fodder maize var. African Tall with micronutrient zinc through ZnSO4 fertilizer application. The study involved fortification at different doses through soil application and foliar sprays at different stages of crop. Green fodder yields were highest at 50 kg ZnSO4 ha-1. Zinc content increased with increasing crop growth from knee high (18.9 mg kg-1) to fodder harvest (37.9 mg kg-1) with highest concentration at soil application of 50 ZnSO4 ha-1. Zinc fortification of 23% was observed when 50 kg of ZnSO4 was added through soil application while soil application of 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 along with two foliar sprays at knee high and tasseling showed on par yields. Foliar sprays complemented soil application but foliar application alone excluding soil application failed to show impact on yields. No significant effect of zinc was observed on quality parameters viz., crude protein, acid detergent fiber or neutral detergent fiber. The crude protein content though did not vary significantly, highest was observed when 50 kg ZnSO4 was applied as soil application. Zinc application significantly influenced Neutral detergent fiber at fodder harvest, on the contrary, acid detergent fiber was not effected at any stage of crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fodder yield was highest with 50 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
50 kg ZnSO4 ha-1e0
Outcome
Green fodder yieldse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Green fodder yields were highest at 50 kg ZnSO4 ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc content increased from knee-high growth to harvest.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Outcome
Zinc contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
37.9 mg kg-1e0
Qualifier
18.9 mg kg-1e0
Comparator
knee highe0

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc content increased with increasing crop growth from knee high (18.9 mg kg-1) to fodder harvest (37.9 mg kg-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of 50 kg ZnSO4 gave 23% zinc fortification.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
50 kg of ZnSO4 was added through soil applicatione0
Outcome
Zinc fortificatione0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc fortification of 23% was observed when 50 kg of ZnSO4 was added through soil application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty-five kg ZnSO4 ha-1 in soil with two foliar sprays gave on-par yields.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
soil application of 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 along with two foliar sprays at knee high and tasselinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
on pare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of 25 kg ZnSO4 ha-1 along with two foliar sprays at knee high and tasseling showed on par yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application alone did not affect yield.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
foliar application alone excluding soil applicatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
failed to show impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application alone excluding soil application failed to show impact on yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–864 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc did not significantly affect crude protein or acid detergent fiber.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
zince0
Outcome
crude protein, acid detergent fibere0
Direction
No significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“No significant effect of zinc was observed on quality parameters viz., crude protein, acid detergent fiber or neutral detergent fiber.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc significantly influenced neutral detergent fiber at harvest.

Taxon
fodder maizet0
Treatment
Zinc applicatione0
Outcome
Neutral detergent fibere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc application significantly influenced Neutral detergent fiber at fodder harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–69 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

42 papers: 37 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

128 papers: 124 positive, 4 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 575 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.