Paper · 2021 · Journal of Agrometeorology

Influence of different protected cultivation structures on performance of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in Indian hot arid region

P.S. KHAPTE; H.M. MEENA; PRADEEP KUMAR; et al.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The performance of gynoecious cucumber (cv. Terminator) was evaluated under three protected structures viz., naturally ventilated polyhouse (NVP), insect proof net house (INH) and shade net house (SNH) at Jodhpur, Rajasthan in hot arid region of India. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) inside these structures during cropping period ranged from 154-842 μmol m-2 s-1 which was much lower than the outside. Among structures, air temperature was 1.2°C and 0.7°C lower while relative humidity (RH) was 17 and 4 per cent higher in NVP and SNH respectively as compared to INH. Relatively low air as well as soil temperature, coupled with high RH and optimal radiation in NVP led to better plant growth and physiological activity which resulted in 42 and 142per cent higher yield than INH and SNH, respectively. Hence, it can be recommended that NVP is the best low-tech protected structure which modifies the microclimate favouring successful cultivation of greenhouse cucumber in Indian hot arid regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAR within protected structures was lower than outside.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Outcome
photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)e0
Direction
much lowere0
Value
154-842 μmol m-2 s-1e0
Comparator
the outsidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) inside these structures during cropping period ranged from 154-842 μmol m-2 s-1 which was much lower than the outside”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–416 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NVP had lower air temperature than INH.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Outcome
air temperaturee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1.2°Ce0
Comparator
INHe0
Setting
NVPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“air temperature was 1.2°C and 0.7°C lower while relative humidity (RH) was 17 and 4 per cent higher in NVP and SNH respectively as compared to INH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNH had lower air temperature than INH.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Outcome
air temperaturee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.7°Ce0
Comparator
INHe0
Setting
SNHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“air temperature was 1.2°C and 0.7°C lower while relative humidity (RH) was 17 and 4 per cent higher in NVP and SNH respectively as compared to INH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NVP had higher relative humidity than INH.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Outcome
relative humidity (RH)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
17e0
Comparator
INHe0
Setting
NVPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“relative humidity (RH) was 17 and 4 per cent higher in NVP and SNH respectively as compared to INH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNH had higher relative humidity than INH.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Outcome
relative humidity (RH)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
4 per cente0
Comparator
INHe0
Setting
SNHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“relative humidity (RH) was 17 and 4 per cent higher in NVP and SNH respectively as compared to INH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–582 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NVP improved plant growth and physiological activity.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Treatment
NVPe0
Outcome
plant growth and physiological activitye0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Relatively low air as well as soil temperature, coupled with high RH and optimal radiation in NVP led to better plant growth and physiological activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NVP raised yield by 42 per cent relative to INH.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Treatment
NVPe1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
42 per cente0
Comparator
INHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“42 and 142per cent higher yield than INH and SNH, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“in NVP led to better plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NVP raised yield by 142 per cent relative to SNH.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Treatment
NVPe1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
142per cente0
Comparator
SNHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“42 and 142per cent higher yield than INH and SNH, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–816 · show in text ↑
e1

“in NVP led to better plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–708 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend NVP for greenhouse cucumber in Indian hot arid regions.

Taxon
cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Cucumis sativust0
Outcome
NVP is the best low-tech protected structuree0
Setting
Indian hot arid regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“NVP is the best low-tech protected structure which modifies the microclimate favouring successful cultivation of greenhouse cucumber in Indian hot arid regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1011 · show in text ↑

protected cultivation · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

protected cultivation · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.