Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Foliar application of sulfur improved growth, yield and physiological attributes of canola (brassica napus L.) under heat stress conditions

Ejaz Ahmad Waraich; Altaf Hussain; Zahoor Ahmad; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
39
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Canola (Brassica napus) is a significant oilseed crop in the world, including in Pakistan. Increases in global temperatures will likely affect future plant species distribution, and could influence the survivability of individual species because of the relationship between temperature, germination and dormancy. The objective of this study was to improve heat tolerance in canola with the foliar application of sulfur. Therefore, a pot study was performed in a growth room at the Institute of Horticultural Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad in 2017-2018 under controlled conditions. Two varieties of canola, i.e., Hyola-401 and 45S42, two levels of foliar sulfur (S0= 0 ppm and S1 500 ppm) treatments, and two temperature levels (T1=18 °C and T2=28 °C) were studied. Heat stress was imposed at the time of anthesis (55-60 days after emergence). Collected data indicated that morphological characters such as root shoot length and their fresh and dry weight showed better performance where foliar sulfur was applied either in heat stress as well as in control conditions where no heat stress was imposed. The photosynthetic rate (6.21 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec), stomatal conductance (0.12 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) and intercellular CO2 concentration (346.13 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) were improved in sulfur treatments under heat stress conditions while transpiration rate (0.51 mol H2O m−2 s−1) was decreased with foliar application of sulfur. Similarly, yield and yield components (No. of siliques per plant (23), No. of seeds per siliqua (20), 1000 seed weight (3.53 g) and overall yield (2.11 t/ha) increased where foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppm. Overall results concluded that the foliar application of sulfur may be helpful for plant tolerance against heat stress by improving the physiological attributes and yield characters in canola. Moreover, among the genotype of Brassica napus L, Hyola 401 performed better in comparison with genotype 45S42 where foliar applied sulfur under heat stress conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sulfur improved root and shoot length under both heat stress and control conditions.

Treatment
foliar sulfure0
Outcome
root shoot lengthe0
Direction
better performancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“morphological characters such as root shoot length and their fresh and dry weight showed better performance where foliar sulfur was applied either in heat stress as well as in control conditions where no heat stress was imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sulfur improved fresh and dry weight under both heat stress and control conditions.

Treatment
foliar sulfure0
Outcome
fresh and dry weighte0
Direction
better performancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“morphological characters such as root shoot length and their fresh and dry weight showed better performance where foliar sulfur was applied either in heat stress as well as in control conditions where no heat stress was imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate improved with sulfur under heat stress.

Treatment
sulfur treatmentse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
6.21 µ mole CO2 m−2/sece0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The photosynthetic rate (6.21 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec), stomatal conductance (0.12 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) and intercellular CO2 concentration (346.13 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) were improved in sulfur treatments under heat stress conditions while transpiration rate (0.51 mol H2O m−2 s−1) was decreased with foliar application of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance improved with sulfur under heat stress.

Treatment
sulfur treatmentse0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
0.12 µ mole CO2 m−2/sece0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The photosynthetic rate (6.21 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec), stomatal conductance (0.12 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) and intercellular CO2 concentration (346.13 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) were improved in sulfur treatments under heat stress conditions while transpiration rate (0.51 mol H2O m−2 s−1) was decreased with foliar application of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO2 concentration improved with sulfur under heat stress.

Treatment
sulfur treatmentse0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentratione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
346.13 µ mole CO2 m−2/sece0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The photosynthetic rate (6.21 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec), stomatal conductance (0.12 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) and intercellular CO2 concentration (346.13 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) were improved in sulfur treatments under heat stress conditions while transpiration rate (0.51 mol H2O m−2 s−1) was decreased with foliar application of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rate decreased with foliar sulfur.

Treatment
foliar application of sulfure0
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.51 mol H2O m−2 s−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“The photosynthetic rate (6.21 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec), stomatal conductance (0.12 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) and intercellular CO2 concentration (346.13 µ mole CO2 m−2/sec) were improved in sulfur treatments under heat stress conditions while transpiration rate (0.51 mol H2O m−2 s−1) was decreased with foliar application of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siliques per plant increased with foliar sulfur at 500 ppm.

Treatment
foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppme0
Outcome
No. of siliques per plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
23e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“No. of siliques per plant (23), No. of seeds per siliqua (20), 1000 seed weight (3.53 g) and overall yield (2.11 t/ha) increased where foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds per siliqua increased with foliar sulfur at 500 ppm.

Treatment
foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppme0
Outcome
No. of seeds per siliquae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“No. of siliques per plant (23), No. of seeds per siliqua (20), 1000 seed weight (3.53 g) and overall yield (2.11 t/ha) increased where foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand seed weight increased with foliar sulfur at 500 ppm.

Treatment
foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppme0
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.53 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“No. of siliques per plant (23), No. of seeds per siliqua (20), 1000 seed weight (3.53 g) and overall yield (2.11 t/ha) increased where foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall yield increased with foliar sulfur at 500 ppm.

Treatment
foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppme0
Outcome
overall yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.11 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“No. of siliques per plant (23), No. of seeds per siliqua (20), 1000 seed weight (3.53 g) and overall yield (2.11 t/ha) increased where foliar sulfur was applied @ 500 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1650 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyola 401 performed better than 45S42 with foliar sulfur under heat stress.

Taxon
Brassica napus LBrassica napuse0
Material
Hyola 401e0
Treatment
foliar applied sulfure0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Qualifier
under heat stress conditionse0
Comparator
45S42e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“among the genotype of Brassica napus L, Hyola 401 performed better in comparison with genotype 45S42 where foliar applied sulfur under heat stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–2012 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that foliar sulfur may help canola tolerate heat stress by improving physiology and yield.

Treatment
foliar application of sulfure0
Outcome
plant tolerance against heat stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“canola (brassica napus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application of sulfur may be helpful for plant tolerance against heat stress by improving the physiological attributes and yield characters in canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1843 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · physiology: gas exchange · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

application · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 38 positive, 9 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

application · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 85 positive, 8 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.