Paper · 2021 · Agriculture & Food Security

Response of bread wheat to sulfur and phosphorus fertilizers in the north central Ethiopia

Shawl Assefa; Wassie Haile; Wondwosen Tena

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Emerging research evidences since few years back are indicating that sulfur (S) is becoming a limiting nutrient in some Ethiopian soils. However, these evidences are not sufficient to make a solid conclusion that some soils of Ethiopia have became deficient in S. There is also limited information on the interaction effects of S and phosphorus (P) on bread wheat in Ethiopia. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of S and P fertilizers; and their interaction on yield components and yield of bread wheat grown at Gerba and Deneba locations, Northern central Ethiopia. A factorial experiment consisting of three levels (0, 15 and 30 kg ha −1 ) of S and four levels (0, 11, 22 and 44 kg ha −1 ) of P was laid out in RCB design with three replications. Results Results revealed that yield components and yield of wheat were significantly affected by both main and interaction effects of S and P fertilizers in both locations. At Gerba, S applied at 15 and 30 kg ha −1 increased grain yield (GY) of wheat by 32 and 44% over untreated control treatment, respectively. The corresponding increases at Deneba were 29 and 37% over untreated control treatment, respectively. However, significantly higher GY was obtained with treatments involving combined application of S and P than that obtained with single application of S or P. GY gains due to S and P interaction effect ranged from 46–65 to 52–75% over untreated control treatment at Gerba and Deneba, respectively. Optimum GY of wheat was obtained with treatment involving 15 kg S ha −1 + 22 kg P ha −1 . Conclusion The results of this experiment revealed that application of P and S fertilizer has significantly increased yield component, grain and straw yield of wheat compared to unfertilized control plot, indicating insufficient soil P and S content for optimum production of wheat and this was confirmed by very low soil test values of S in both sites. Combined application of S and P produced significantly higher yield of wheat than that obtained with single application of S or P indicating synergistic interaction between these nutrients. In all cases, optimum grain and straw yield of wheat was obtained with treatment involving at 22 P + 15 S kg ha −1 , while a partial budget analysis result revealed that a combination of 22P and 15S kg ha −1 produced the highest MMR (54.9%). Thus this treatment is found to be economically feasible treatment for bread wheat production in study area of the district.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum wheat grain yield was obtained with 15 kg S ha-1 plus 22 kg P ha-1.

Treatment
15 kg S ha −1 + 22 kg P ha −1e4
Outcome
GYe4
Qualifier
Optimume4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Optimum GY of wheat was obtained with treatment involving 15 kg S ha −1 + 22 kg P ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1596 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In all cases, optimum wheat grain and straw yield was obtained with 22 P plus 15 S kg ha-1.

Treatment
22 P + 15 S kg ha −1e5
Outcome
grain and straw yielde5
Qualifier
In all casese5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In all cases, optimum grain and straw yield of wheat was obtained with treatment involving at 22 P + 15 S kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2143–2257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

P and S fertilizer significantly increased wheat yield components, grain and straw yield compared with unfertilized control.

Treatment
application of P and S fertilizere6
Outcome
yield component, grain and straw yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Comparator
unfertilized control plote6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“application of P and S fertilizer has significantly increased yield component, grain and straw yield of wheat compared to unfertilized control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1655–1802 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The 22P + 15S kg ha-1 treatment is economically feasible for bread wheat production in the study area.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
economically feasible treatmente1
Setting
study area of the districte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“this treatment is found to be economically feasible treatment for bread wheat production in study area of the district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2390–2508 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined S and P gave higher yield than single applications, indicating synergistic interaction between the nutrients.

Treatment
Combined application of S and Pe1
Outcome
yield of wheate1
Qualifier
synergistic interaction between these nutrientse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Combined application of S and P produced significantly higher yield of wheat than that obtained with single application of S or P indicating synergistic interaction between these nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2141 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

568 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.