Abstract
Abstract Background Emerging research evidences since few years back are indicating that sulfur (S) is becoming a limiting nutrient in some Ethiopian soils. However, these evidences are not sufficient to make a solid conclusion that some soils of Ethiopia have became deficient in S. There is also limited information on the interaction effects of S and phosphorus (P) on bread wheat in Ethiopia. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of S and P fertilizers; and their interaction on yield components and yield of bread wheat grown at Gerba and Deneba locations, Northern central Ethiopia. A factorial experiment consisting of three levels (0, 15 and 30 kg ha −1 ) of S and four levels (0, 11, 22 and 44 kg ha −1 ) of P was laid out in RCB design with three replications. Results Results revealed that yield components and yield of wheat were significantly affected by both main and interaction effects of S and P fertilizers in both locations. At Gerba, S applied at 15 and 30 kg ha −1 increased grain yield (GY) of wheat by 32 and 44% over untreated control treatment, respectively. The corresponding increases at Deneba were 29 and 37% over untreated control treatment, respectively. However, significantly higher GY was obtained with treatments involving combined application of S and P than that obtained with single application of S or P. GY gains due to S and P interaction effect ranged from 46–65 to 52–75% over untreated control treatment at Gerba and Deneba, respectively. Optimum GY of wheat was obtained with treatment involving 15 kg S ha −1 + 22 kg P ha −1 . Conclusion The results of this experiment revealed that application of P and S fertilizer has significantly increased yield component, grain and straw yield of wheat compared to unfertilized control plot, indicating insufficient soil P and S content for optimum production of wheat and this was confirmed by very low soil test values of S in both sites. Combined application of S and P produced significantly higher yield of wheat than that obtained with single application of S or P indicating synergistic interaction between these nutrients. In all cases, optimum grain and straw yield of wheat was obtained with treatment involving at 22 P + 15 S kg ha −1 , while a partial budget analysis result revealed that a combination of 22P and 15S kg ha −1 produced the highest MMR (54.9%). Thus this treatment is found to be economically feasible treatment for bread wheat production in study area of the district.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Optimum wheat grain yield was obtained with 15 kg S ha-1 plus 22 kg P ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume4 - Treatment
- 15 kg S ha −1 + 22 kg P ha −1e4
- Outcome
- GYe4
- Qualifier
- Optimume4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“Optimum GY of wheat was obtained with treatment involving 15 kg S ha −1 + 22 kg P ha −1”
Claim · model-written summary
In all cases, optimum wheat grain and straw yield was obtained with 22 P plus 15 S kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume5 - Treatment
- 22 P + 15 S kg ha −1e5
- Outcome
- grain and straw yielde5
- Qualifier
- In all casese5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“In all cases, optimum grain and straw yield of wheat was obtained with treatment involving at 22 P + 15 S kg ha −1”
Claim · model-written summary
P and S fertilizer significantly increased wheat yield components, grain and straw yield compared with unfertilized control.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume6 - Treatment
- application of P and S fertilizere6
- Outcome
- yield component, grain and straw yielde6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Comparator
- unfertilized control plote6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“application of P and S fertilizer has significantly increased yield component, grain and straw yield of wheat compared to unfertilized control plot”
Claim · model-written summary
The 22P + 15S kg ha-1 treatment is economically feasible for bread wheat production in the study area.
- Taxon
- bread wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Outcome
- economically feasible treatmente1
- Setting
- study area of the districte1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“this treatment is found to be economically feasible treatment for bread wheat production in study area of the district”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined S and P gave higher yield than single applications, indicating synergistic interaction between the nutrients.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- Combined application of S and Pe1
- Outcome
- yield of wheate1
- Qualifier
- synergistic interaction between these nutrientse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Combined application of S and P produced significantly higher yield of wheat than that obtained with single application of S or P indicating synergistic interaction between these nutrients”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- no effect
144 papers more in this group
See all 148 papers →phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
523 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
568 papers more in this group
See all 572 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- no effect
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.