Paper · 2021 · Revista Caatinga

MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ON PRODUCTION AND PHYSICOCHEMICAL TRAITS OF FRUITS OF CONVENTIONALLY AND ORGANICALLY GROWN FIG1

ELIAS ARIEL DE MOURA; VANDER MENDONÇA; ENOCH DE SOUZA FERREIRA; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted due to its organoleptic and pharmacological properties. Search for innovations to improve the crop management has increased to reduce environmental impacts and improve the organoleptic quality and food safety of the fruits. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of fertilization methods and plant training systems on the production and physicochemical traits of fig. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design in a 5 × 4 factorial scheme, with three blocks and three plants per plot. The factors corresponded to five fertilizers (chemical, cattle manure, sheep manure, poultry litter, and organic compost) and four training systems (two branches, three branches, four branches, and espalier). Results showed that, when using chemical fertilizer and poultry litter, plants showed similar productivity and number of fruits, which had similar firmness, length, and peel color (L and °h). The highest production and number of immature fruits were obtained using cattle manure. Soluble solids content and soluble solids content/ titratable acidity ratio were higher in fruits from plants fertilized with cattle manure, sheep manure, and organic compost. On the other hand, plants trained with three and four branches or in espalier produced fruits with the highest soluble solids content and weight. Also, heavier fruits were obtained using chemical fertilization and conducting plants with two, three, and four branches.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry litter gave production and fruit number similar to chemical fertilizer in fig.

Taxon
Ficus carica L.Ficus caricae0
Treatment
poultry littere1
Outcome
productivity and number of fruitse1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
chemical fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“when using chemical fertilizer and poultry litter, plants showed similar productivity and number of fruits, which had similar firmness, length, and peel color (L and °h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry litter gave fruit firmness, length and peel color similar to chemical fertilizer in fig.

Taxon
Ficus carica L.Ficus caricae0
Treatment
poultry littere1
Outcome
firmness, length, and peel colore1
Direction
similare1
Comparator
chemical fertilizere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“when using chemical fertilizer and poultry litter, plants showed similar productivity and number of fruits, which had similar firmness, length, and peel color (L and °h)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–970 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure gave the highest fig production.

Taxon
Ficus carica L.Ficus caricae0
Treatment
cattle manuree2
Outcome
productione2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest production and number of immature fruits were obtained using cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure gave the highest number of immature fig fruits.

Taxon
Ficus carica L.Ficus caricae0
Treatment
cattle manuree2
Outcome
number of immature fruitse2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest production and number of immature fruits were obtained using cattle manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure, sheep manure and organic compost raised fig soluble solids content and soluble solids/titratable acidity ratio.

Taxon
Ficus carica L.Ficus caricae0
Treatment
cattle manure, sheep manure, and organic composte3
Outcome
Soluble solids content and soluble solids content/ titratable acidity ratioe3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“Soluble solids content and soluble solids content/ titratable acidity ratio were higher in fruits from plants fertilized with cattle manure, sheep manure, and organic compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-branch, four-branch and espalier training gave fig fruit with the highest soluble solids content and weight.

Taxon
Ficus carica L.Ficus caricae0
Treatment
three and four branches or in espaliere4
Outcome
soluble solids content and weighte4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“plants trained with three and four branches or in espalier produced fruits with the highest soluble solids content and weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1380 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical fertilization gave heavier fig fruits.

Taxon
Ficus carica L.Ficus caricae0
Treatment
chemical fertilizatione5
Outcome
fruitse5
Direction
heaviere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e5

“heavier fruits were obtained using chemical fertilization and conducting plants with two, three, and four branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1502 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-, three- and four-branch training gave heavier fig fruits.

Taxon
Ficus carica L.Ficus caricae0
Treatment
two, three, and four branchese5
Outcome
fruitse5
Direction
heaviere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ficus carica
Ficus carica · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fig (Ficus carica L.) is widely accepted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e5

“heavier fruits were obtained using chemical fertilization and conducting plants with two, three, and four branches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1502 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Ficus carica (common fig)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.