Paper · 2021 · Sustainability

Building Climate-Resilient Cotton Production System for Changing Climate Scenarios Using the DSSAT Model

Zoia Arshad Awan; Tasneem Khaliq; Muhammad Masood Akhtar; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton production is highly vulnerable to climate change, and heat stress is a major constraint in the cotton zone of Punjab, Pakistan. Adaptation is perceived as a critical step to deal with forecasted and unexpected climatic conditions. The objective of this study was to standardize and authenticate a cotton crop model based on climate and crop husbandry data in order to develop an adaptation package for cotton crop production in the wake of climate change. For the study, the data were collected from the cotton-growing areas of Punjab, viz. Bahawalpur and Khanewal. After the calibration and validation against field data, the Cropping System Model CSM–CROPGRO–Cotton in the shell of the decision support system for agro-technology transfer (DSSAT) was run with a future climate generated under two representative concentrations pathways (RCPs), viz. RCPs 4.5 and 8.5 with five global circulation models (GCMs). The whole study showed that a model is an artistic tool for examining the temporal variation in cotton and determining the potential impact of planting dates on crop growth, phenology, and yield. The results showed that the future climate would have drastic effects on cotton production in the project area. Reduction in seed cotton yield (SCY) was 25.7% and 32.2% under RCPs 4.5 and 8.5, respectively. The comparison of five GCMs showed that a hot/wet climate would be more damaging than other scenarios. The simulations with different production options showed that a 10% and 5% increase in nitrogen and plant population, respectively, compared to the present would be the best strategy in the future. The model further suggested that planting conducted 15 days earlier, combined with the use of water and nitrogen (fertigation), would help to improve yield with 10% less water under the future climate. Overall, the proposed adaptation package would help to recover 33% and 37% of damages in SCY due to the climate change scenarios of RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively. Furthermore, the proposed package would also help the farmers increase crop yield by 7.5% over baseline (current) yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Future RCP 4.5 reduced seed cotton yield by 25.7%.

Treatment
RCPs 4.5e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
25.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in seed cotton yield (SCY) was 25.7% and 32.2% under RCPs 4.5 and 8.5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Future RCP 8.5 reduced seed cotton yield by 32.2%.

Treatment
8.5e0
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
Reductione0
Value
32.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction in seed cotton yield (SCY) was 25.7% and 32.2% under RCPs 4.5 and 8.5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Hot and wet climate was more damaging to cotton than other scenarios.

Outcome
damaginge0
Direction
more damaginge0
Comparator
other scenariose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The comparison of five GCMs showed that a hot/wet climate would be more damaging than other scenarios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1425 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen by 10% was identified as part of the best future strategy.

Treatment
10% and 5% increase in nitrogen and plant populatione0
Outcome
best strategye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The simulations with different production options showed that a 10% and 5% increase in nitrogen and plant population, respectively, compared to the present would be the best strategy in the future.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Planting 15 days earlier with fertigation was suggested to improve yield with 10% less water.

Treatment
planting conducted 15 days earlier, combined with the use of water and nitrogen (fertigation)e0
Outcome
improve yielde0
Qualifier
10% less watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The model further suggested that planting conducted 15 days earlier, combined with the use of water and nitrogen (fertigation), would help to improve yield with 10% less water under the future climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The adaptation package recovered 33% of seed cotton yield damage under RCP 4.5.

Treatment
proposed adaptation packagee0
Outcome
damages in SCYe0
Direction
recovere0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
RCP 4.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, the proposed adaptation package would help to recover 33% and 37% of damages in SCY due to the climate change scenarios of RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–1988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The adaptation package recovered 37% of seed cotton yield damage under RCP 8.5.

Treatment
proposed adaptation packagee0
Outcome
damages in SCYe0
Direction
recovere0
Value
37%e0
Comparator
8.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, the proposed adaptation package would help to recover 33% and 37% of damages in SCY due to the climate change scenarios of RCP 4.5 and 8.5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–1988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The package increased crop yield by 7.5% over current baseline yield.

Treatment
proposed packagee0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
7.5%e0
Comparator
baseline (current) yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Furthermore, the proposed package would also help the farmers increase crop yield by 7.5% over baseline (current) yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1989–2109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑

storage · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.