Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Different Levels of Zinc and Farm Yard Manure on the Physico-Chemical Properties of Soil and Yield of Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151

Parshottam Kumar Sinha; Tarence Thomas; Ashish Masih; et al.

15
claims
39
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The field experiment was carried out at Department of Soil Science, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Allahabad, India during summer season (March to May) of 2016. The experiment was laid out in 3×3 factorial randomized block design with 9 treatments in three replications. It is concluded that the best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%] in respect to different days intervals i.e. 25, 50 and 75 days after sowing (DAS). Plant height was 9.05, 30.66 and 48.05 cm found to be significant at 25 and 75 DAS but non-significant at 50 DAS, leaf length were 6.94, 7.86 and 8.77 cm found to be significant at 30, 50 and 90 DAS, no. of leaves plant-1 were 8.66, 19.55 and 22.99 found to be significant at 75 DAS but non-significant at 25 and 50 DAS, Highest number of pods was found in T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%] which was 28.44 found to be significant. Highest pod length was found in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%] which was 8.88 cm found to be significant. T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%] found highest seed yield (q ha-1) and number of seed pod-1 which were 8.20 and 11.11 respectively found to be significant. The economy of different treatment concerned, the treatment T6 (Z2 + FYM0) provides highest net profit of 16498.00 with cost benefit ratio is 1: 1.47. However, since these findings are based on one year experiment and therefore, further research may be conducted to substantiate it under Allahabad agro climatic conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram plant height was 9.05 at 25 DAS.

Material
Laxmi-151t0
Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Value
9.05e0
Qualifier
25e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height was 9.05, 30.66 and 48.05 cm found to be significant at 25 and 75 DAS but non-significant at 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram plant height was 30.66 at 50 DAS.

Material
Laxmi-151t0
Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Value
30.66e0
Qualifier
50e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height was 9.05, 30.66 and 48.05 cm found to be significant at 25 and 75 DAS but non-significant at 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram plant height was 48.05 cm at 75 DAS.

Material
Laxmi-151t0
Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Value
48.05 cme0
Qualifier
75e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height was 9.05, 30.66 and 48.05 cm found to be significant at 25 and 75 DAS but non-significant at 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–601 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram leaf length was 6.94 at 30 DAS.

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Value
6.94e0
Qualifier
30e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf length were 6.94, 7.86 and 8.77 cm found to be significant at 30, 50 and 90 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram leaf length was 7.86 at 50 DAS.

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Value
7.86e0
Qualifier
50e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf length were 6.94, 7.86 and 8.77 cm found to be significant at 30, 50 and 90 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram leaf length was 8.77 cm at 90 DAS.

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Value
8.77 cme0
Qualifier
90e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf length were 6.94, 7.86 and 8.77 cm found to be significant at 30, 50 and 90 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram leaves per plant were 8.66 at 25 DAS.

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
no. of leaves plant-1e0
Value
8.66e0
Qualifier
25e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“no. of leaves plant-1 were 8.66, 19.55 and 22.99 found to be significant at 75 DAS but non-significant at 25 and 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram leaves per plant were 19.55 at 50 DAS.

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
no. of leaves plant-1e0
Value
19.55e0
Qualifier
50e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“no. of leaves plant-1 were 8.66, 19.55 and 22.99 found to be significant at 75 DAS but non-significant at 25 and 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 green gram leaves per plant were 22.99 at 75 DAS.

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e1
Outcome
no. of leaves plant-1e0
Value
22.99e0
Qualifier
75e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“no. of leaves plant-1 were 8.66, 19.55 and 22.99 found to be significant at 75 DAS but non-significant at 25 and 50 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“best yield attributes characters in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced the highest green gram number of pods (28.44).

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
28.44e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest number of pods was found in T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%] which was 28.44 found to be significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–911 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced the highest green gram pod length (8.88 cm).

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e0
Outcome
pod lengthe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
8.88 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest pod length was found in treatment T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%] which was 8.88 cm found to be significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced the highest green gram seed yield (8.20).

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
8.20e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%] found highest seed yield (q ha-1) and number of seed pod-1 which were 8.20 and 11.11 respectively found to be significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 produced the highest green gram number of seed pod-1 (11.11).

Treatment
T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%]e0
Outcome
number of seed pod-1e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
11.11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“T8 [Zinc@100% + FYM@100%] found highest seed yield (q ha-1) and number of seed pod-1 which were 8.20 and 11.11 respectively found to be significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had the highest net profit for green gram.

Treatment
T6 (Z2 + FYM0)e0
Outcome
net profite0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16498.00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment T6 (Z2 + FYM0) provides highest net profit of 16498.00 with cost benefit ratio is 1: 1.47”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 had the highest cost benefit ratio for green gram.

Treatment
T6 (Z2 + FYM0)e0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1: 1.47e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) VAR. Laxmi-151”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–156 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment T6 (Z2 + FYM0) provides highest net profit of 16498.00 with cost benefit ratio is 1: 1.47”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1322 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.