Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Photoperiodic Flowering Response of Essential Oil, Grain, and Fiber Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Cultivars

Mengzi Zhang; Steven L. Anderson; Zachary T. Brym; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
53
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cultivation of hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) in tropical and subtropical regions can be challenging if the flowering behavior of a given cultivar is unknown, poorly understood, or not accurately selected for the photoperiod. Identifying cultivars adapted to local environmental conditions is key to optimizing hemp vegetative and flowering performance. We investigated the effects of varying light cycles in regulating extension growth and flowering response of 15 essential oil and 12 fiber/grain hemp cultivars both indoors and outdoors. Plants were subjected to 11 photoperiods in the controlled rooms ranging from 12 to 18 h, and natural day length in the field. The critical photoperiod threshold was identified for seven essential oil cultivars and two fiber/grain cultivars. “Cherry Wine-CC,” “PUMA-3,” and “PUMA-4” had the shortest critical day length between 13 h 45 min and 14 h. The flowering of essential oil cultivars was generally delayed by 1–2 days when the photoperiod exceeded 13 h compared with 12 h, and flowering was further delayed by 7–8 days when the photoperiod exceeded 14 h. In fiber/grain cultivars, flowering was generally delayed by 1–3 days when the day length exceeded 14 h. Flowering for most essential oil cultivars was delayed by 5–13 days under a 14-h photoperiod compared with 13 h 45 min, suggesting a photoperiod difference as little as 15 min can significantly influence the floral initiation of some essential oil cultivars. Cultivars represented by the same name but acquired from different sources can perform differently under the same environmental conditions, suggesting genetic variation among cultivars with the same name. Average days to flower of fiber/grain cultivars was correlated with reported cultivar origin, with faster flowering occurring among northern cultivars when compared with southern cultivars. Plant height generally increased as the day length increased in essential oil cultivars but was not affected in fiber/grain cultivars. In addition, civil twilight of ~2 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 was discovered to be biologically effective in regulating hemp flowering. Collectively, we conclude that most of the essential oil cultivars and some southern fiber/grain cultivars tested express suitable photoperiods for tropical and sub-tropical region cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical photoperiod thresholds were identified for seven essential oil cultivars.

Material
essential oil cultivarse0
Outcome
critical photoperiod thresholde0
Value
sevene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical photoperiod threshold was identified for seven essential oil cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical photoperiod thresholds were identified for two fiber/grain cultivars.

Material
fiber/grain cultivarse1
Outcome
critical photoperiod thresholde1
Value
twoe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two fiber/grain cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–777 · show in text ↑
e1

“The critical photoperiod threshold was identified for seven essential oil cultivars and two fiber/grain cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cherry Wine-CC, PUMA-3 and PUMA-4 had the shortest critical day length, 13 h 45 min to 14 h.

Material
“Cherry Wine-CC,” “PUMA-3,” and “PUMA-4”e0
Outcome
critical day lengthe0
Direction
shorteste0
Value
between 13 h 45 min and 14 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

““Cherry Wine-CC,” “PUMA-3,” and “PUMA-4” had the shortest critical day length between 13 h 45 min and 14 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil cultivar flowering was delayed 1–2 days above 13 h versus 12 h.

Material
essential oil cultivarse0
Treatment
photoperiod exceeded 13 he0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
1–2 dayse0
Comparator
12 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flowering of essential oil cultivars was generally delayed by 1–2 days when the photoperiod exceeded 13 h compared with 12 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil cultivar flowering was further delayed 7–8 days above 14 h.

Material
essential oil cultivarse1
Treatment
photoperiod exceeded 14 he0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
7–8 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowering was further delayed by 7–8 days when the photoperiod exceeded 14 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“The flowering of essential oil cultivars was generally delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber/grain cultivar flowering was delayed 1–3 days above 14 h.

Material
fiber/grain cultivarse0
Treatment
day length exceeded 14 he0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
1–3 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In fiber/grain cultivars, flowering was generally delayed by 1–3 days when the day length exceeded 14 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most essential oil cultivars flowered 5–13 days later at 14 h than at 13 h 45 min.

Material
essential oil cultivarse0
Treatment
14-h photoperiode0
Outcome
Floweringe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
5–13 dayse0
Comparator
13 h 45 mine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flowering for most essential oil cultivars was delayed by 5–13 days under a 14-h photoperiod compared with 13 h 45 min”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Same-named cultivars from different sources performed differently under the same conditions.

Material
Cultivars represented by the same namee0
Outcome
perform differentlye0
Direction
differentlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivars represented by the same name but acquired from different sources can perform differently under the same environmental conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1601 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average days to flower in fiber/grain cultivars correlated with reported cultivar origin.

Material
fiber/grain cultivarse0
Outcome
Average days to flowere0
Setting
reported cultivar origine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average days to flower of fiber/grain cultivars was correlated with reported cultivar origin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Northern fiber/grain cultivars flowered faster than southern cultivars.

Material
northern cultivarse0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
fastere0
Comparator
southern cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“faster flowering occurring among northern cultivars when compared with southern cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1856 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil cultivar height generally increased with day length.

Material
essential oil cultivarse0
Treatment
day lengthe0
Outcome
Plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height generally increased as the day length increased in essential oil cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1945 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber/grain cultivar height was unaffected by day length.

Material
fiber/grain cultivarse1
Treatment
day lengthe1
Outcome
Plant heighte1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but was not affected in fiber/grain cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1946–1991 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant height generally increased as the day length increased in essential oil cultivars but was not affected in fiber/grain cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1991 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Civil twilight near 2 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 regulated hemp flowering.

Treatment
civil twilighte0
Outcome
hemp floweringe0
Value
~2 μmol·m −2 ·s −1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“civil twilight of ~2 μmol·m −2 ·s −1 was discovered to be biologically effective in regulating hemp flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2115 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Most essential oil cultivars tested had suitable photoperiods for tropical and subtropical cultivation.

Material
essential oil cultivarse0
Outcome
suitable photoperiods for tropical and sub-tropical region cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of the essential oil cultivars and some southern fiber/grain cultivars tested express suitable photoperiods for tropical and sub-tropical region cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2148–2309 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Some southern fiber/grain cultivars tested had suitable photoperiods for tropical and subtropical cultivation.

Material
southern fiber/grain cultivarse0
Outcome
suitable photoperiods for tropical and sub-tropical region cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some southern fiber/grain cultivars tested express suitable photoperiods for tropical and sub-tropical region cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2188–2309 · show in text ↑
t0

“hemp (Cannabis sativa L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 68–93 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Cannabis sativaPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.