Paper · 2021 · 5th International Students Science Congress

Fertilizer Rate for Optimum Growth and Yield of Egusi Melon (Colocynthis citrullus L.)/ Hot Pepper (Capsicum chinense, Jackquin cv. rodo) Intercrop

Anjola S. Aninkan; Eyitayo A. Makinde

12
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The use of chemical fertilizers as a supplemental source of nutrients has been on the increase but they are not applied in balanced proportion by most farmers [1]. Also, fertilizer requirements of the mixed intercropping systems have been a matter of conjecture; some studies had suggested that fertilizer requirements of the dominant component be applied [2], others recommend that the sum of the sole crop requirements, be applied [3]. Teriah [4], however, stated that both practices have proved either inadequate or wasteful. In this experiment the effects of different rates of NPK 15-15-15 fertilizer application on growth and yield of hot pepper and Egusi melon in an intercropping system was examined to determine optimum rate for production. The experiment was carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Federal University of Agriculture Abeokuta, in the south western part of Nigeria. It took place from March to October 2017 during the growing season. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 5 treatments (fertilizer rates) and 3 replicates. Treatments were; 0, 100, 200, 300 and 400 kg/ha of NPK 15-15-15 applications. Plot size was 3m by 3m with a 1.5m gang way round each plot to reduce inter-plot effect. Data were collected on growth parameters at 6 weeks after treatment (WAT) and continued at two-week intervals until 10 WAT. Four plants each of pepper and Egusi melon from the inner rows were randomly selected and tagged for the purpose of data collection. Data on yield were also collected at ripening. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out on each observation and the Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used for means separation (P≤0.05). The effects of fertilizer rates showed significant difference on pepper plant height, number of leaves, number of branches and leaf area. However, there was no significant difference in the effect of fertilizer rate on days to 50% flowering of pepper. Number of vines and vine length of Egusi melon were significantly different in their responses to fertilizer rates but the leaf area and days to 50% flowering of melon were similar at the various treatment levels. Meanwhile, total fruit yield of pepper, number of Egusi melon pods per hectare and the dry matter yield of Egusi melon showed significant difference. It was concluded from the study that the growth and yield of pepper and Egusi melon in intercrop increased with increase in fertilizer rate up to 400Kg/ha of NPK (15:15:15). However, higher fertilizer application rates should be explored in future studies for a better yield increase. These studies should be carried out with various compositions of inorganic and organic fertilizer application rates to ensure sustainable fertilizer application and to also preserve the natural fertility of the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer rates significantly affected pepper plant height, leaf number, branch number, and leaf area.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
pepper plant height, number of leaves, number of branches and leaf areae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of fertilizer rates showed significant difference on pepper plant height, number of leaves, number of branches and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer rate did not significantly affect days to 50% flowering in pepper.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
fertilizer ratee0
Outcome
days to 50% flowering of peppere0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in the effect of fertilizer rate on days to 50% flowering of pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–1969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Egusi melon vine number and length differed significantly across fertilizer rates.

Treatment
fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
Number of vines and vine lengthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus mucosospermus
Citrullus mucosospermus · TaxonMicha Baum · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of vines and vine length of Egusi melon were significantly different in their responses to fertilizer rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1971–2085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Egusi melon leaf area was similar across fertilizer rates.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
various treatment levelse0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf area and days to 50% flowering of melon were similar at the various treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2090–2183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Egusi melon days to 50% flowering were similar across fertilizer rates.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
various treatment levelse0
Outcome
days to 50% flowering of melone0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf area and days to 50% flowering of melon were similar at the various treatment levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2090–2183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper total fruit yield differed significantly across fertilizer rates.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
fertilizer ratese1
Outcome
total fruit yield of peppere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“total fruit yield of pepper, number of Egusi melon pods per hectare and the dry matter yield of Egusi melon showed significant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fertilizer Rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effects of fertilizer rates showed significant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Egusi melon pod number per hectare differed significantly across fertilizer rates.

Treatment
Fertilizer Ratet0
Outcome
number of Egusi melon pods per hectaree0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus mucosospermus
Citrullus mucosospermus · TaxonMicha Baum · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total fruit yield of pepper, number of Egusi melon pods per hectare and the dry matter yield of Egusi melon showed significant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fertilizer Rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Egusi melon dry matter yield differed significantly across fertilizer rates.

Treatment
Fertilizer Ratet0
Outcome
dry matter yield of Egusi melone0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus mucosospermus
Citrullus mucosospermus · TaxonMicha Baum · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total fruit yield of pepper, number of Egusi melon pods per hectare and the dry matter yield of Egusi melon showed significant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2196–2333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fertilizer Rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrop growth and yield of pepper rose with fertilizer rate up to 400Kg/ha.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
fertilizer rate up to 400Kg/ha of NPK (15:15:15)e0
Outcome
growth and yield of peppere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and yield of pepper and Egusi melon in intercrop increased with increase in fertilizer rate up to 400Kg/ha of NPK (15:15:15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2372–2507 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercrop growth and yield of Egusi melon rose with fertilizer rate up to 400Kg/ha.

Treatment
fertilizer rate up to 400Kg/ha of NPK (15:15:15)e0
Outcome
growth and yield of pepper and Egusi melon in intercrope0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus mucosospermus
Citrullus mucosospermus · TaxonMicha Baum · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the growth and yield of pepper and Egusi melon in intercrop increased with increase in fertilizer rate up to 400Kg/ha of NPK (15:15:15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2372–2507 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Higher fertilizer rates should be examined for yield improvement.

Taxon
peppert0
Outcome
higher fertilizer application rates should be explored in future studies for a better yield increasee0

Verbatim

e0

“higher fertilizer application rates should be explored in future studies for a better yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2518–2618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hot Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–98 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend testing inorganic and organic fertilizer compositions.

Outcome
various compositions of inorganic and organic fertilizer application ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus mucosospermus
Citrullus mucosospermus · TaxonMicha Baum · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These studies should be carried out with various compositions of inorganic and organic fertilizer application rates to ensure sustainable fertilizer application and to also preserve the natural fertility of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2620–2835 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egusi Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–59 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Citrullus mucosospermus (egusi melon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.