Paper · 2021 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Hortorum Cultus

SAVING WATER USED FOR VEGETABLE PRODUCTION BY APPLYING REGULATED DEFICIT IRRIGATION PRACTICES

Yu-Sen Chang; Kuan-Hung Lin; Ying-Jung Chen; et al.

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water deficit during the growing season is a major factor limiting vegetable production. Therefore, saving water used for vegetable production by applying regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) can be a strategy to reduce water supply. The effects of different RDI levels from irrigation systems on vegetable yields, yield components, water use, and water use efficiency (WUE) of maize, lettuce, and garland chrysanthemum were investigated in a pot experiment. Plants were subjected to four irrigation levels, as follows: full irrigation as a control (RDI-100), 70% of full irrigation (RDI-70), 50% of full irrigation (RDI-50), and 30% of full irrigation (RDI-30). The WUE values of maize and lettuce were significantly higher with RDI-30 than other treatments, yet a significant reduction of WUE in garland chrysanthemum was detected compared to other treatments. There were significant correlations of WUEi with WUEyield and WUEbiomass in maize plants, indicating that WUEi can be a useful nondestructive estimator of yields and biomass contents in maize. Moreover, a significant correlation between WUEi and WUEyield in lettuce plants was observed. This index was correlated with economic production, and can be used to assess fresh weights and as an index of the irrigated water content. These results for evaluating water deficits in plants used nondestructive measurements that are applicable to large-scale water management of vegetable plants, thereby enabling scarce water resources to be conserved.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize WUE was significantly higher with RDI-30 than other treatments.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
RDI-30e0
Outcome
WUE valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WUE values of maize and lettuce were significantly higher with RDI-30 than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce WUE was significantly higher with RDI-30 than other treatments.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
RDI-30e0
Outcome
WUE valuese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WUE values of maize and lettuce were significantly higher with RDI-30 than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–756 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Garland chrysanthemum WUE was significantly reduced under RDI-30 versus other treatments.

Taxon
garland chrysanthemume0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“yet a significant reduction of WUE in garland chrysanthemum was detected compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–859 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize WUEi correlated significantly with WUEyield and WUEbiomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
plantse0
Outcome
WUEyield and WUEbiomasse0
Qualifier
significant correlationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significant correlations of WUEi with WUEyield and WUEbiomass in maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–949 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider WUEi a useful nondestructive estimator of maize yield and biomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
useful nondestructive estimator of yields and biomass contentse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUEi can be a useful nondestructive estimator of yields and biomass contents in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1052 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce WUEi correlated significantly with WUEyield.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Organ / stage
plantse0
Outcome
WUEyielde0
Qualifier
significant correlatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a significant correlation between WUEi and WUEyield in lettuce plants was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1146 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The index correlated with economic production and can assess fresh weight and irrigated water content.

Taxon
vegetablet0
Outcome
fresh weights and as an index of the irrigated water contente0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“This index was correlated with economic production, and can be used to assess fresh weights and as an index of the irrigated water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“VEGETABLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–42 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

324 papers: 284 positive, 40 negative or no effect

283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

320 papers more in this group

See all 324 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.