Paper · 1997 · Medical Entomology and Zoology

Alcohol use and occupational culture in the skilled building trades : an ethnographic study

Sharon Popp

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grapevine rupestris stem pitting associated virus (GRSPaV) is one of the most widely distributed viruses; even so, little is known about its effect on Vitis vinifera. To provide new insights, the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon" were studied by evaluating growth parameters, such as measurements of the total plant length, the number and distance of internodes and the number of leaves per shoot. In addition, parameters relating to gas exchange, i.e., the stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, internal CO2 concentration and leaf transpiration, were also assessed. All the measurements were performed in one- and two-year-old plants with a single GRSPaV infection or mixed infections of GRSPaV and Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV). The results show that the plant phytosanitary status did not significantly alter the growth and gas exchange parameters in one-year-old plants. However, in two-year-old plants, single GRSPaV infections increased shoot elongation, which was accompanied by the overexpression of genes associated with the gibberellic acid response pathway. The gas exchange parameters of these plants were negatively affected, despite exhibiting higher LHCII gene expression. Plants with mixed infections did not have modified growth parameters, although they presented a greater reduction in the primary photosynthetic parameters evaluated with no change in LHCII expression. The results presented here confirm the co-evolution hypothesis for V. vinifera and GRSPaV during the early stages of plant development, and they provide new evidence about the effects of GRSPaV and GFLV co-infections on the "Cabernet Sauvignon" cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytosanitary status did not significantly alter growth and gas exchange parameters in one-year-old grapevines.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
one-year-old plantse2
Treatment
phytosanitary statuse2
Outcome
growth and gas exchange parameterse2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–290 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results show that the plant phytosanitary status did not significantly alter the growth and gas exchange parameters in one-year-old plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single GRSPaV infection increased shoot elongation in two-year-old plants.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
two-year-old plantse3
Treatment
single GRSPaV infectionse3
Outcome
shoot elongatione3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“in two-year-old plants, single GRSPaV infections increased shoot elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1030 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot elongation in two-year-old plants with single infection was accompanied by overexpression of genes of the gibberellic acid response pathway.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae1
Gene
genes associated with the gibberellic acid response pathwaye4
Compound
gibberellic acide4
Outcome
overexpressione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–290 · show in text ↑
e4

“was accompanied by the overexpression of genes associated with the gibberellic acid response pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gas exchange parameters of two-year-old plants with single infection were negatively affected.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
two-year-old plantse3
Treatment
single GRSPaV infectionse3
Outcome
gas exchange parameterse5
Direction
negatively affectede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“in two-year-old plants, single GRSPaV infections increased shoot elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1030 · show in text ↑
e5

“The gas exchange parameters of these plants were negatively affected, despite exhibiting higher LHCII gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1257 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-year-old plants with single infection showed higher LHCII gene expression.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae1
Organ / stage
two-year-old plantse3
Gene
LHCIIe5
Outcome
LHCII gene expressione5
Direction
highere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–290 · show in text ↑
e3

“in two-year-old plants, single GRSPaV infections increased shoot elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1030 · show in text ↑
e5

“The gas exchange parameters of these plants were negatively affected, despite exhibiting higher LHCII gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed GRSPaV and GFLV infections did not modify growth parameters.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
mixed infectionse6
Second interactor
Grapevine fanleaf virusGrapevine fanleaf viruse7pathogen
Outcome
growth parameterse6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–290 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plants with mixed infections did not have modified growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1327 · show in text ↑
e7

“or mixed infections of GRSPaV and Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed infections caused a greater reduction in primary photosynthetic parameters.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
mixed infectionse7
Second interactor
Grapevine fanleaf virusGrapevine fanleaf viruse7pathogen
Outcome
primary photosynthetic parameterse2
Direction
greater reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–290 · show in text ↑
e7

“or mixed infections of GRSPaV and Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–800 · show in text ↑
e2

“although they presented a greater reduction in the primary photosynthetic parameters evaluated with no change in LHCII expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1458 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixed infections caused no change in LHCII expression.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae1
Treatment
mixed infectionse7
Second interactor
Grapevine fanleaf virusGrapevine fanleaf viruse7pathogen
Outcome
LHCII expressione2
Direction
no changee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of single and mixed GRSPaV infections on the V. vinifera cultivar "Cabernet Sauvignon"”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–290 · show in text ↑
e7

“or mixed infections of GRSPaV and Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–800 · show in text ↑
e2

“although they presented a greater reduction in the primary photosynthetic parameters evaluated with no change in LHCII expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1458 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors state that the results confirm the co-evolution hypothesis for V. vinifera and GRSPaV during early plant development.

Taxon
V. viniferaVitis viniferae0
Outcome
co-evolution hypothesise0
Qualifier
during the early stages of plant developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results presented here confirm the co-evolution hypothesis for V. vinifera and GRSPaV during the early stages of plant development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1594 · show in text ↑

infection · physiology: gas exchange · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.