Paper · 2021 · Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences

Anatomical changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under aluminium stress condition

Rifat Samad; Parveen Rashid; JL Karmoker

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of aluminium (Al) toxicity on the anatomical changes in the root, stem and leaf of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) plants grown in sand culture. Toxicity of Al reduced the length of primary root and the number of lateral roots of chickpea than that of the control. Aluminium decreased the size and number of vessels in the root of chickpea. Larger area of sclerenchyma cells was noticed in the stem of Al-stressed plant. Number of palisade parenchyma was reduced in the leaf of chickpea. Aluminium treatment caused closure of stomata. Increased number of trichomes in chickpea leaves was also reported due to aluminium. Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 30(2): 187-196, 2021 (July)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al toxicity reduced chickpea primary root length relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
primary roote0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
length of primary roote0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Toxicity of Al reduced the length of primary root and the number of lateral roots of chickpea than that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al toxicity reduced the number of lateral roots of chickpea relative to control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
lateral rootse0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
number of lateral rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Toxicity of Al reduced the length of primary root and the number of lateral roots of chickpea than that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium reduced root vessel size and number in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
Aluminiume0
Outcome
size and number of vesselse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminium decreased the size and number of vessels in the root of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al stress increased the area of stem sclerenchyma cells.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
steme0
Treatment
Ale0
Outcome
area of sclerenchyma cellse0
Direction
Largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Larger area of sclerenchyma cells was noticed in the stem of Al-stressed plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–471 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium reduced the number of leaf palisade parenchyma cells.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Number of palisade parenchymae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number of palisade parenchyma was reduced in the leaf of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–538 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium treatment caused stomatal closure.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
stomatae0
Treatment
Aluminiume0
Outcome
closure of stomatae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminium treatment caused closure of stomata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminium increased the number of trichomes in chickpea leaves.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
chickpea leavese0
Outcome
number of trichomese0
Direction
Increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased number of trichomes in chickpea leaves was also reported due to aluminium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–670 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.