Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Evaluation of Melia Dubia for its Biomass Production, Carbon Stock, Carbon Sequestration and Economic Returns in Agroforestry System

V. Ishwarya Laxmi; A. Krishna; A. Madhavi Lata; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to estimate biomass production, carbon stock, carbon sequestration and economic performance of Melia dubia under agri-silviculture system. This experiment was laid out in a Split design and replicated thrice, treatments comprised of two main plots (Clones) M I MTP-I M II MTP-II and seven subplots(Intercrops) T 1 Finger millet , T 2 Foxtail millet, T 3 Pearl millet, T 4 Greengram, T 5 Blackgram, T 6 Cowpea, T 7 Only trees. Sole crop without trees are maintained. Results showed that MTP-I clone recorded higher volume, biomass production, carbon stock, carbon dioxide sequestration in agri-silviculture system when compared to MTP-II and sole crop. In terms of income wise MTP-I recorded higher gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio than MTP-II. Incase of intercrops, blackgram registered higher net returns and B:C ratio than other intercrops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MTP-I had higher volume, biomass production and carbon stock than MTP-II.

Taxon
Melia dubiaMelia dubiat0
Material
MTP-Ie0
Treatment
MTP-I clonee0
Outcome
volume, biomass production, carbon stocke0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MTP-IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melia dubia
Melia dubia · TaxonKeystone Foundation Uploaded by Vinayaraj · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MTP-I clone recorded higher volume, biomass production, carbon stock, carbon dioxide sequestration in agri-silviculture system when compared to MTP-II and sole crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melia Dubia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MTP-I had higher carbon dioxide sequestration than MTP-II.

Taxon
Melia DubiaMelia dubiat0
Treatment
MTP-I clonee0
Outcome
carbon dioxide sequestratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MTP-IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melia dubia
Melia dubia · TaxonKeystone Foundation Uploaded by Vinayaraj · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MTP-I clone recorded higher volume, biomass production, carbon stock, carbon dioxide sequestration in agri-silviculture system when compared to MTP-II and sole crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melia Dubia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MTP-I had higher gross returns, net returns and benefit-cost ratio than MTP-II.

Taxon
Melia DubiaMelia dubiat0
Treatment
MTP-Ie0
Outcome
gross returns, net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
MTP-IIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melia dubia
Melia dubia · TaxonKeystone Foundation Uploaded by Vinayaraj · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MTP-I recorded higher gross returns, net returns and B:C ratio than MTP-II.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Melia Dubia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blackgram had higher net returns and benefit-cost ratio than other intercrops.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
blackgrame0
Outcome
net returns and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other intercropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“blackgram registered higher net returns and B:C ratio than other intercrops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–885 · show in text ↑