Paper · 2021

The underlying mechanisms of post-drought yield outperformance in L. perenne

Marie-Louise Schärer; Andreas Lüscher; Lucia Fuchslueger; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Reoccurring drought events can severely restrict forage production. However, experimentally drought stressed temperate forage grasslands have recently been reported to recover quickly after drought stress and re-wetting (DRW) and to be even more productive after drought than non-drought stressed control plots (Hofer et al., 2017; Hahn et al., in press). Although several studies show increased nutrient availability and microbial activity after DRW in grasslands (Bünemann et al., 2013; Sundert et al., 2020), an in-depth understanding if or how these mechanisms determine forage yield recovery is still missing. Methods This study examined the effect of a 2-month experimental summer drought under different nitrogen (N) fertilizer applications on the recovery of high-input Lolium perenne swards after re-wetting. Yield performance, physiology, nutrient availability and soil microbial activity were assessed over 2 years during and after the drought treatment. In addition, a post-drought transplantation experiment of control and DRW soil and plants withdrawn from the field was conducted to disentangle plant physiological and soil nutrient cycling effects on yield recovery after drought. Results Under all N applications, DRW outperformed the control yield in the field and showed higher N mineralization rates and higher soil N and K availabilities. Transplanted DRW plants showed longer but thinner leaves and decreased yields compared to control plants, irrespective of the soil’s DRW treatment. In contrast, DRW soils induced strongly increased L. perenne yields (on average +25%) compared to control soils. In summary, our data show that despite impaired plant growth after DRW, formerly drought stressed swards surpass control yields by profiting of higher mineralization rates and higher nutrient availability. References Bünemann EK, Keller B, Hoop D, Jud K, Boivin P, Frossard E (2013) Increased availability of phosphorus after drying and rewetting of a grassland soil: processes and plant use. Plant and Soil 370: 511–526 Hahn C, Lüscher A, Ernst-HaslerS, Suter M, Kahmen A (in press) Timing of drought in the growing season and strong legacy effects determine the annual productivity of temperate grasses in a changing climate. Biogeosciences. Hofer D, Suter M, Buchmann N, Lüscher A (2017) Nitrogen status of functionally different forage species explains resistance to severe drought and post-drought overcompensation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 236: 312–322 Sundert KV, Brune V, Bahn M, Deutschmann M, Hasibeder R, Nijs I, Vicca S (2020) Post-drought rewetting triggers substantial K release and shifts in leaf stoichiometry in managed and abandoned mountain grasslands. Plant Soil 448: 353–368

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and rewetting increased field yield under all N applications.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
DRWe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
controle0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under all N applications, DRW outperformed the control yield in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1347 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and rewetting increased soil N mineralization rates.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
DRWe0
Outcome
N mineralization ratese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DRW outperformed the control yield in the field and showed higher N mineralization rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1388 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and rewetting increased soil N availability.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee2
Treatment
DRWe1
Outcome
soil Ne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher soil N and K availabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under all N applications, DRW outperformed the control yield in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1347 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and rewetting increased soil K availability.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee2
Treatment
DRWe1
Outcome
K availabilitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher soil N and K availabilities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under all N applications, DRW outperformed the control yield in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1347 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted drought-rewetted plants had longer leaves.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
DRWe0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transplanted DRW plants showed longer but thinner leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1485 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted drought-rewetted plants had thinner leaves.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
DRWe0
Outcome
leavese0
Direction
thinnere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transplanted DRW plants showed longer but thinner leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1485 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted drought-rewetted plants yielded less than controls regardless of soil treatment.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
DRWe2
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased yields compared to control plants, irrespective of the soil’s DRW treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1581 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑
e2

“Transplanted DRW plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-rewetted soils raised Lolium yields by an average 25%.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
DRW soilse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+25%e0
Comparator
control soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DRW soils induced strongly increased L. perenne yields (on average +25%) compared to control soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1703 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute post-drought yield surplus to greater mineralization and nutrient availability despite impaired plant growth.

Taxon
Lolium perenneLolium perennee1
Treatment
DRWe0
Outcome
surpass control yieldse0
Qualifier
higher mineralization rates and higher nutrient availabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite impaired plant growth after DRW, formerly drought stressed swards surpass control yields by profiting of higher mineralization rates and higher nutrient availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1909 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lolium perenne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–841 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.