Paper · 2020 · Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas

Yield and yield components of tomato grafted plants in the high Andean region of Colombia

Jamer Alexis Ramírez-Jiménez; Carlos Felipe Barrera-Sánchez; Oscar De Jesús Córdoba-Gaona

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Grafting as a technique is gaining attention, and the production and demand for grafted vegetable plants have increased worldwide, especially for greenhouse cultivation. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of different scion × rootstock combinations or improving the yield of the tomato crop under greenhouse conditions. For this purpose, a scion of tomato cv. Libertador was grafted on two commercial tomato rootstock (‘Olimpo’ and ‘Armada’) and cultivated in a greenhouse in a randomized complete block experiment design, with four scion-rootstock combinations: vigor and resistance rootstocks, self-grafting and non-grafted plants. The yield and yield components were evaluated (number and weight of the fruits of extra, commercial, and non-commercial quality, weight per cluster, and weight per fruit). Although vigor rootstocks produce less fresh fruit in the first harvests, from the seventh harvest onwards, the vigor rootstocks outperformed the other treatments in the accumulated yield by producing 37, 22 and 22% more yield, and 60, 30 and 40% higher number of fruits of extra quality in the resistance rootstock, self-grafted, and non-grafted plants. The fruits plants of vigor rootstock, self-grafted and non-grafted above 150 g, tend to have a cylindrical shape; however, fruits in the resistance rootstock tend to be flattened. The use of a vigor rootstock increased the yield of cv. Libertador, regarding the rootstock with resistance characteristics and controls, self-grafted, and non-grafted plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigor rootstock produced 37% more accumulated yield than the resistance rootstock.

Treatment
vigor rootstocke1
Outcome
accumulated yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
37e1
Comparator
resistance rootstocke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the vigor rootstocks outperformed the other treatments in the accumulated yield by producing 37, 22 and 22% more yield, and 60, 30 and 40% higher number of fruits of extra quality in the resistance rootstock, self-grafted, and non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigor rootstock produced 22% more accumulated yield than self-grafted plants.

Treatment
vigor rootstocke1
Outcome
accumulated yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
22e1
Comparator
self-graftede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the vigor rootstocks outperformed the other treatments in the accumulated yield by producing 37, 22 and 22% more yield, and 60, 30 and 40% higher number of fruits of extra quality in the resistance rootstock, self-grafted, and non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigor rootstock produced 22% more accumulated yield than non-grafted plants.

Treatment
vigor rootstocke1
Outcome
accumulated yielde1
Direction
moree1
Value
22e1
Comparator
non-graftede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the vigor rootstocks outperformed the other treatments in the accumulated yield by producing 37, 22 and 22% more yield, and 60, 30 and 40% higher number of fruits of extra quality in the resistance rootstock, self-grafted, and non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigor rootstock gave 60% higher number of extra-quality fruits than the resistance rootstock.

Treatment
vigor rootstocke1
Outcome
number of fruits of extra qualitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
60e1
Comparator
resistance rootstocke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the vigor rootstocks outperformed the other treatments in the accumulated yield by producing 37, 22 and 22% more yield, and 60, 30 and 40% higher number of fruits of extra quality in the resistance rootstock, self-grafted, and non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigor rootstock gave 30% higher number of extra-quality fruits than self-grafted plants.

Treatment
vigor rootstocke1
Outcome
number of fruits of extra qualitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
30e1
Comparator
self-graftede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the vigor rootstocks outperformed the other treatments in the accumulated yield by producing 37, 22 and 22% more yield, and 60, 30 and 40% higher number of fruits of extra quality in the resistance rootstock, self-grafted, and non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigor rootstock gave 40% higher number of extra-quality fruits than non-grafted plants.

Treatment
vigor rootstocke1
Outcome
number of fruits of extra qualitye1
Direction
highere1
Value
40e1
Comparator
non-graftede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the vigor rootstocks outperformed the other treatments in the accumulated yield by producing 37, 22 and 22% more yield, and 60, 30 and 40% higher number of fruits of extra quality in the resistance rootstock, self-grafted, and non-grafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vigor rootstock produced less fresh fruit in the first harvests.

Treatment
vigor rootstockse2
Outcome
fresh fruite2
Direction
lesse2
Qualifier
in the first harvestse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Although vigor rootstocks produce less fresh fruit in the first harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits above 150 g from vigor, self-grafted and non-grafted plants tend to be cylindrical.

Treatment
vigor rootstocke3
Outcome
cylindrical shapee3
Qualifier
above 150 ge3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The fruits plants of vigor rootstock, self-grafted and non-grafted above 150 g, tend to have a cylindrical shape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits from the resistance rootstock tend to be flattened.

Treatment
resistance rootstocke4
Outcome
flattenede4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“fruits in the resistance rootstock tend to be flattened”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1292–1347 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑

grafting · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 15 positive, 12 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 151 positive, 25 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.